scholarly journals Evaluation of Intensive Care Measures in Children with Severe New Coronavirus Infection in Pediatric Intensive Care Units

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 7-14
Author(s):  
Yu. S. Аleksandrovich ◽  
D. V. Prometnoy ◽  
P. I. Mironov ◽  
K. V. Pshenisnov ◽  
P. E. Аnchutin ◽  
...  

Currently, the number of publications on specific features of the clinical course and outcomes of new coronavirus infection COVID-19 in children is steadily increasing, but there are practically no works demonstrating the effectiveness of intensive care interventions, which served as the basis for the present analysis.The objective is to assess the effectiveness of primary intensive care interventions in children with a severe course of new coronavirus infection.Subjects and Methods. 94 patients were examined. Evaluation of intensive care measures was carried out upon admission to ICU.Results. It was found that corticosteroids were used only in 55 (58.5%) patients (χ2 = 5.254, p = 0.022, Pearson conjugation criterion = 0.130). A moderate correlation was established between the unjustified prescription of prednisolone and the unfavorable disease outcome (χ2 = 27.98, p < 0.001, Pearson conjugation criterion = 0.296). The moderate strength of the association between the prescription of antibacterial drugs and the disease outcome was noted (χ2 = 34.01, p < 0.001, Pearson conjugation criterion = 0.331). In all lethal cases, there was volume overload due to excessive intravenous fluid administration (χ2 = 5.14, p = 0.024).Conclusion: individual therapeutic strategies do not have a direct significant impact on outcomes of new coronavirus infection in children, however, the delivery of comprehensive intensive care presented in clinical guidelines is associated with the patient's recovery.

2011 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 649-654 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kanakadurga Singer ◽  
Perla Subbaiah ◽  
Raymond Hutchinson ◽  
Folafoluwa Odetola ◽  
Thomas P. Shanley

Author(s):  
Utku Karaarslan ◽  
Sevgi Topal ◽  
Yüce Ayhan ◽  
Hasan Ağın

Abstract Objectives The objectives of this study were to evaluate the differences in the viral etiologies and variability in the clinical course between children with and without severe disability (SD) admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) with acute respiratory illness (ARI). Methods The medical records of patients admitted to our PICU between June 2017 and July 2019 were retrospectively reviewed for viral etiology and clinical course. Results Forty-eight of 136 patients included in the study had SD. The rates of requiring positive pressure ventilation (43.5% vs. 20.5%) or inotropic support (39.9% vs. 15.9%), and the median length of stay (11 [10] vs. 5 [8]) were significantly higher in children with SD (p < 0.01, each). Influenza infection was significantly higher in children with SD (20.8% vs. 2.3%; p < 0.01) whereas respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection was more common in children without SD (47.7% vs. 4.2%; p < 0.01). There was no statistically significant difference in terms of other viruses between study groups. Conclusion In this present study, influenza was an important pathogen for children with SD, while RSV was the main cause of ARI-associated PICU admission in children without SD. By focusing on increasing the rate of immunization against influenza in children with SD and their caregivers the burden of influenza-associated PICU admissions could be decreased.


2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 871.3-872
Author(s):  
F. Demir ◽  
K. Ulu ◽  
Ş. Çağlayan ◽  
T. Coşkuner ◽  
B. Sözeri

Background:Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in our country, Turkey, more than two million people have been infected and more than 20,000 people have died. Although children infected less frequently and generally have a milder findings of COVID-19, the number of patients with a more severe clinical course as multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) is increasing significantly. However, it has not been shown exactly how biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD)s, which we frequently use in our pediatric rheumatology practice, and/or the underlying rheumatological diseases affect the clinical course of COVID-19.Objectives:Here, we aimed to reveal the outcome of COVID-19 infection in our patients with pediatric rheumatic disease and treated with bDMARDs.Methods:During the period between April 1, 2020 and December 1, 2020, the patients who received bDMARDs were evaluated at the regular outpatient clinic follow-up or by telemedicine with a maximum of 3 months interval. Clinical and demographic characteristics, COVID-19 data and outcome of these patients were retrospectively collected.Results:Out of the 436 patients treated with bDMARDs, 39 children were infected with COVID-19. The diagnosis was confirmed in 37 patients by RT-PCR (nasalpharyngeal swab) and in two by antibody test. Twenty-two (56.4%) patients were female (17 male, %43.6) and the median age of patients were 12.3 years (min-max: 1.2-20.9). The primary diagnosis of patients were as follows; 20 juvenile idiopathic arthritis (six were systemic subtype), 12 systemic autoinflammatory diseases, three vasculitis, three chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis and one Sjögren’s syndrome. Prior to COVID-19 infection, 13 patients (33.3%) were using canakinumab, seven were infliximab (18%), five were adalimumab (12.8%), four were etanercept 10.2%), four were tocilizumab (10.2%), three were anakinra (7.7%), two were rituximab (5.1%), and one was tofacitinib (2.6%).Of the 39 patients, 21 had at least one COVID-19-related symptom, while 18 patients were asymptomatic. No laboratory or imaging tests was performed for asymptomatic patients and they were followed up without treatment at home isolation. Laboratory tests revealed that fourteen patients had elevated acute phase reactants, six had elevated D-dimer levels, three had lymphopenia (<1000/mm3), and three had hyperferritinemia.Hospitalization was required in 20 patients (51.3%) at median of 7-days (min-max: 3-17) and pediatric intensive care unit admission in one. Five patients developed MIS-C and one of these patients was followed up in the pediatric intensive care unit. Myocardial dysfunction was developed in this patient and he was died. The other four patients fully recovered with no remain morbidity.Conclusion:Considering the literature data and the results of our study, it is not possible to say that currently used bDMARDs worse the course of COVID-19 infection. In patients with underlying risk factors for hyperinflammation, as in one of our patients, COVID-19 may cause mortality regardless of the use of bDMARDs. Whether bDMARDs does not affect the severity of the disease, but it is still not true to say that these drugs are protective. Since cessation of bDMARDs for COVID-risk may cause exacerbation of the primary rheumatic disease, continuing with current treatments seems an appropriate approach.References:[1]FELDSTEIN LR, ROSE EB, HORWITZ SM, et al: Overcoming COVID-19 Investigators; CDC COVID-19 Response Team. Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in U.S. Children and Adolescents. N Engl J Med 2020; 383: 334-46.[2]MICHELENA X, BORRELL H, LÓPEZ-CORBETO M, et al. Incidence of COVID-19 in a cohort of adult and paediatric patients with rheumatic diseases treated with targeted biologic and synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2020; 50: 564-70.Disclosure of Interests:None declared.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (7) ◽  
pp. 36
Author(s):  
Arun Bansal ◽  
Namita Ravikumar ◽  
Manu Sundaram ◽  
Utpal Bhalala ◽  
Dhiren Gupta

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document