scholarly journals Orthodontic treatment of a case with a congenitally missing maxillary canine and a malformed contralateral canine

2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 121-127
Author(s):  
Ahmed I. Masoud ◽  
Feras H. Bindagji
Keyword(s):  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Maxillary Canine ◽  
Congenitally Missing

scholarly journals Prevalence of Cross Bite Among the Orthodontic Patients in Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University

2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-12
Author(s):  
Naznin Sultana ◽  
Gazi Shamim Hassan ◽  
Digamber Jha ◽  
Towhida Nashrin ◽  
Lutfun Nahar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Class I ◽  
Dental Arch ◽  
Diagnostic Model ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Posterior Crossbite ◽  
Orthodontic Patients ◽  
Medical University ◽  
Functional Components ◽  
Congenitally Missing

Crossbite is one of the most prevalent malocclusion, posterior crossbite occurs in 8% to 22% of orthodontic cases and anterior crossbite has been seen in Class III cases, which accounts for 3.4% of orthodontic cases. The etiology of posterior crossbite can include any combination of dental, skeletal, and neuro muscular functional components, but the most frequent cause is reduction in width of the maxillary dental arch. Patients/cases seeking comprehensive orthodontic treatment in between 5 to 35 years were diagnosed for crossbite with diagnostic model and care record file. Out of 300 cases 163(54.3%) had crossbite, 90(30%) had anterior crossbite and 109(36.3%) had posterior cross bite. Among posterior crossbite 60(20%) had unilateral and 49(16.3%) had bilateral crossbite. Posterior crossbite was more prevalent than anterior crossbite. Cases with Class I molar relation showed more crossbite. Crossbite was more prevalent in cases with congenitally missing teeth.Bangladesh J Medicine Jan 2015; 26 (1) : 9-12

scholarly journals Orthodontic management of a complete and an incomplete maxillary canine-first premolar transposition

2019 ◽  
Vol 90 (3) ◽  
pp. 457-466 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carmen Lorente ◽  
Pedro Lorente ◽  
Maria Perez-Vela ◽  
Cristina Esquinas ◽  
Teresa Lorente
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Case Report ◽  
Early Diagnosis ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
The Other ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Normal Position ◽  
Maxillary Canine ◽  
Apical Position ◽  
Complete Transposition

ABSTRACT Maxillary canine and first premolar transposition is a complicated dental anomaly to treat, especially if the clinician's goal is to orthodontically move the canine into its normal position. Early diagnosis with cone-beam computed tomography simplifies the treatment of this pathology. This case report describes a patient with bilateral transposition, one complete and the other incomplete, involving the maxillary canine and the first premolar (Mx.C.1P). The orthodontic treatment involved the correction of both transpositions. In the complete transposition, the traction was mesial and upward to move the canine into a more apical position with a wider dentoalveolar process for easier crown interchange.

External invasive resorption: Case report of a rapidly progressive process in an impacted maxillary canine during orthodontic treatment

2018 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 259-264 ◽  
Author(s):  
Avi Shemesh ◽  
Galit Birnboim‐Blau ◽  
Ronen Zoizner ◽  
Joe Ben Itzhak ◽  
Michael Solomonov
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Maxillary Canine

Lingually Displaced Mandibular Canine Teeth: Orthodontic Treatment Alternatives in the Dog

1992 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashley B. Oakes ◽  
Gary B. Beard
Keyword(s):  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Periodontal Pocket ◽  
Orthodontic Appliances ◽  
Canine Tooth ◽  
Maxillary Canine ◽  
Oronasal Fistula ◽  
Mandibular Canine ◽  
Treatment Alternatives ◽  
Further Development

Lingual displacements of mandibular canine teeth often occur following retention of deciduous canine teeth. This condition often results in trauma of occlusion to the Ungual aspect of the maxillary canine tooth and the further development of a periodontal pocket or an oronasal fistula. This condition can be corrected using orthodontic appliances. The purpose of this paper is to discuss and illustrate the various alternatives available for correction of this common malocclusion in dogs.

Orthodontic Treatment of a Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patient with Bilateral Tooth Transpositions and Congenitally Missing Teeth

2010 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 225-231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kiyoshi Tai ◽  
Jae Hyun Park ◽  
Masahiro Tanino ◽  
Yasumori Sato
Keyword(s):  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Missing Teeth ◽  
Long Term Stability ◽  
Bilateral Cleft Lip ◽  
Congenitally Missing Teeth ◽  
Congenitally Missing ◽  
Palate Patient

Treatment of patients with a cleft lip and palate can be challenging. A boy, 15 years 11 months old, with a bilateral cleft lip and palate and a convex profile, transposed teeth and congenitally missing teeth was treated by orthodontic treatment. 3 year posttreatment records showed excellent results with good occlusion,facial balance and harmony, and long-term stability.

scholarly journals Orthodontic treatment of a transposed maxillary canine and first premolar in a young patient with Class III malocclusion

2015 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 322 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Gracco ◽  
Laura Siviero ◽  
Alessandro Perri ◽  
Lorenzo Favero ◽  
Edoardo Stellini
Keyword(s):  
Young Patient ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Class Iii Malocclusion ◽  
Maxillary Canine

scholarly journals Reliability of a Novel CBCT-Based 3D Classification System for Maxillary Canine Impactions in Orthodontics: The KPG Index

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Domenico Dalessandri ◽  
Marco Migliorati ◽  
Rachele Rubiano ◽  
Luca Visconti ◽  
Luca Contardo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Classification System ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Interrater Agreement ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Maxillary Canine ◽  
Dental Imaging ◽  
Dimensional Classification

The aim of this study was to evaluate both intra- and interoperator reliability of a radiological three-dimensional classification system (KPG index) for the assessment of degree of difficulty for orthodontic treatment of maxillary canine impactions. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of fifty impacted canines, obtained using three different scanners (NewTom, Kodak, and Planmeca), were classified using the KPG index by three independent orthodontists. Measurements were repeated one month later. Based on these two sessions, several recommendations on KPG Index scoring were elaborated. After a joint calibration session, these recommendations were explained to nine orthodontists and the two measurement sessions were repeated. There was a moderate intrarater agreement in the precalibration measurement sessions. After the calibration session, both intra- and interrater agreement were almost perfect. Indexes assessed with Kodak Dental Imaging 3D module software showed a better reliability inz-axis values, whereas indexes assessed with Planmeca Romexis software showed a better reliability inx- andy-axis values. No differences were found between the CBCT scanners used. Taken together, these findings indicate that the application of the instructions elaborated during this study improved KPG index reliability, which was nevertheless variously influenced by the use of different software for images evaluation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document