Potato Yield Response and Nitrate Leaching as Influenced by Nitrogen Management

1998 ◽  
Vol 90 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Errebhi ◽  
Carl J. Rosen ◽  
Satish C. Gupta ◽  
David E. Birong
2012 ◽  
Vol 92 (4) ◽  
pp. 771-781 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. P. Moulin ◽  
Y. Cohen ◽  
V. Alchanatis ◽  
N. Tremblay ◽  
K. Volkmar

Moulin, A. P., Cohen, Y., Alchanatis, V., Tremblay, N. and Volkmar, K. 2012. Yield response of potatoes to variable nitrogen management by landform element and in relation to petiole nitrogen – A case study. Can. J. Plant Sci. 92: 771–781. Recent increases in the cost of fertilizer N have prompted producers to assess the potential to vary inputs within fields and during the growing season to produce the highest marketable yield of potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.). A study was conducted from 2005 to 2007 near Brandon, Manitoba, Canada, to assess the spatial variability of potato yield in upper, middle and lower landform elements on a sandy loam soil in response to a range of N fertilizer rates applied in the spring or in combination with an application during the growing season. There was no clear trend with respect to the effect of landform on potato yield. Nitrogen fertilizer increased total and marketable yield relative to the control at rates from 75 to 225 kg ha−1in split applications or applied at seeding. No significant interaction between landform and fertilizer treatment was observed. Petiole N concentration, determined late in the growing season, was correlated with potato yield though the correlation varied considerably between years. Petiole leaflet N concentration was affected by fertilizer on most sampling dates, but decreased with time during the growing season. We conclude that although N fertilizer could be applied during the growing season based on petiole leaflet N concentration deficiencies in mid-July, there is no clear difference in potato yield due to split application relative to spring applications of N fertilizer at rates of 75 kg ha−1or greater based on landform elements for potato production, likely due to the short growing season in western Canada.


Agronomy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 2055
Author(s):  
Chedzer-Clarc Clément ◽  
Athyna N. Cambouris ◽  
Noura Ziadi ◽  
Bernie J. Zebarth ◽  
Antoine Karam

Nitrate leaching is of great environmental concern, particularly with potatoes grown on sandy soils. This 3-year study evaluated the effect of three N rates (100, 150, and 200 kg ha−1) of single applications of polymer-coated urea (PCU) and a 75% PCU + 25% urea mixture, plus a conventional split application of 200 kg N ha−1 of a 50% ammonium sulfate + 50% calcium ammonium nitrate mixture (CONV) on NO3−-N leaching, potato yield, and N uptake under irrigated and non-irrigated conditions on a sandy soil in Quebec (Canada). Fertilizer N application increased growing season NO3−-N leaching only under irrigation. On average, irrigation increased seasonal NO3−-N leaching by 52%. Under irrigated conditions, PCU reduced NO3−-N leaching compared to PCU + urea. However, both PCU and PCU + urea significantly increased NO3−-N leaching compared to the CONV at the equivalent N rate of 200 kg N ha−1. This was attributed to the timing of soil N availability and deep-water percolation. Total (TY) and marketable (MY) yields in the CONV were similar to those in the PCU applied at the equivalent N rate of 200 kg N ha−1. Despite lower plant N uptake, PCU resulted in greater TY and MY compared to PCU + urea. Residual soil inorganic N was greater for PCU and PCU + urea compared to the CONV, providing evidence that PCU products have the potential to increase NO3−-N leaching after the growing season. In this study, PCU was an agronomically and environmentally better choice than PCU + urea. The results also showed that the efficiency of PCU to reduce seasonal NO3−-N leaching may vary according to the timing of precipitation and irrigation.


2000 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 251-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. T. Waddell ◽  
S. C. Gupta ◽  
J. F. Moncrief ◽  
C. J. Rosen ◽  
D. D. Steele

1999 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 1365-1371 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel P. Rasse ◽  
Joe T. Ritchie ◽  
W. Richard Peterson ◽  
Ted L. Loudon ◽  
Edward C. Martin

2001 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 10-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
James L. Baker

The primary mode of nitrogen (N) loss from tile-drained row-cropped land is generally nitrate-nitrogen (NO3-N) leaching. Although cropping, tillage, and N management practices can be altered to reduce the amount of leaching, there are limits as to how much can be done. Data are given to illustrate the potential reductions for individual practices such as rate, method, and timing of N applications. However, most effects are multiplicative and not additive; thus it is probably not realistic to hope to get overall reductions greater than 25 to 30% with in-field practices alone. If this level of reduction is insufficient to meet water quality goals, additional off-site landscape modifications may be necessary.


2021 ◽  
Vol 300 ◽  
pp. 113739
Author(s):  
By Aaron De Laporte ◽  
Kamaljit Banger ◽  
Alfons Weersink ◽  
Claudia Wagner-Riddle ◽  
Brian Grant ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 479-479
Author(s):  
Rebecca D. Marjerison ◽  
Jeff Melkonian ◽  
John L. Hutson ◽  
Harold M. van Es ◽  
Shai Sela ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 92 (2) ◽  
pp. 237-237
Author(s):  
Sampson Agyin-Birikorang ◽  
Yoana C. Newman ◽  
Augustine K. Obour ◽  
Gabriel N. Kasozi

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document