Copyrights Piracy in Entertainment Media: Technological Development and Challenges to the Intellectual Property Rights

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Girjesh Shukla
2013 ◽  
pp. 1474-1492
Author(s):  
Ahmed Driouchi ◽  
Molk Kadiri

Information and communication technologies, nanotechnologies and microelectronics are progressively challenging the current state of intellectual property rights. This is related to the economic features underlying these technologies. The directions of changes in intellectual property rights are found to require further coping with the overall chain of innovation and with the uncertainty that can be embedded in the new trends of technological development.


2019 ◽  
pp. 119-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grigory I. Senchenia

With the acceleration of technological development and the digital transformation of economies, the impact of intellectual property on economic growth will increase. The article shows that the forms and means of legal protection and use of intellectual property will evolve in line with the opportunities that will be provided by the infrastructure (production, fixation, management, tracking and protection of intellectual property rights) in this area. In Russia, the “digitalization” of legal protection and use of intellectual property rights will make it possible to form public-private platforms for rights management, which will create additional opportunities for authors to effectively manage their rights. This will attract investors to the non-raw-material sector of the economy and may become an important driver for the development of the digital economy in the country as a whole.


Author(s):  
Iryna Kuzmych

This article presents a brief, detailed breakdown of the heterogeneity of definitions of biotechnology, as objects of intellectual property, as well as related processes, in international legal acts of the European Parliament, the Council of the EU and the European Community, an attempt has been made to investigate the legal existentiality of biopatents and to characterize the importance of features of the essence of biotechnology, to substantiate the extreme conditionality of the procedure for patenting biotechnology, taking into account this specificity at the stage of creating a national regulatory framework, laid down in the main national regulations. The approaches of international legal acts regarding the consolidation of the principles of protection and protection of intellectual property rights, in particular, and, above all, on biotechnology, as in the a priority scientific, economic and state - strategic sphere, are partially disclosed and the peculiarities of their implementation in national legislation are defined. The warnings about the possible devastating consequences of the current incompetent approach by domestic legislators to the essence of biotechnology as objects of intellectual property, creation of mechanisms of intellectual lawmaking, given their unique ability to self-reproduce and self-reproduce, are pointed out. However, at the same time, it has been noted so far that there have been significant changes in the gradual approximation of legal standards to the standards of the European Community law system, in particular, in ensuring the protection of intellectual property rights in biotechnology, which will have a beneficial effect on the prospect of the emergence of a key innovative legal model with a unified legislative spirals with an understanding of the necessary separation of biotechnologies into an independent legal local intellectual sphere of civilization with an appropriate level of responsibility. The multifaceted nature of the content of biotechnology has turned a science that studies the possibilities of using living organisms, their systems or their vital products to solve technological problems, as well as the possibility of creating living organisms with the necessary properties by genetic engineering, into one of the areas of industry of important macroeconomic importance. In all leading countries of the world, national and international programs on biotechnology, funded by public and private capital, are developed and are operating, in addition, the results of scientific research in the field of biotechnology. Implement long-term projects with a high degree of risk upon receipt of various commercial products, the development results of which must be reliably protected from competitors, possibly while ensuring the granting of exclusive rights to new products and technologies by patenting. Thus, the protection of the right to biotechnology makes the patent an instrument for transferring technology and protecting new markets in the global economy, where the use of such an instrument is most effective in industries with a high cost of research and development, but low production cost of the final product, typical for biotechnological, microbiological and pharmaceutical industry. Convincingly, even in a quote by A. Einstein, «Nature shows us only the tail of the lion. But I do not doubt that the lion belongs to it even though he cannot at once reveal himself because of his enormous size.»24, there are warnings regarding a negligent attitude towards the natural uniqueness of biotechnologies and an understanding of the devastating consequences of an incompetent approach to the interpretation of the concepts and processes associated with biotechnologies when creating a domestic regulatory and legal framework for the protection of intellectual property rights in biotechnologies, the need for biopatents, taking into account the supremacy and legal existence of biotechnologies, as objects of intellectual property and a powerful generator of scientific and technological development ia of the country, the guarantor of innovation and financial stability, and, the innermost unexplored possibilities of biotechnology with unpredictable prospects for humanity.


Author(s):  
Ahmed Driouchi ◽  
Molk Kadiri

Information and communication technologies, nanotechnologies and microelectronics are progressively challenging the current state of intellectual property rights. This is related to the economic features underlying these technologies. The directions of changes in intellectual property rights are found to require further coping with the overall chain of innovation and with the uncertainty that can be embedded in the new trends of technological development.


Author(s):  
Maciej Barczewski ◽  
Sebastian Sykuna

Over the past few years the WTO Council for Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights recognized the growing concern over an imbalance between intellectual property and public interest. With regard to health technologies in particular, without sufficient use of balancing exceptions and limitations, patents and related monopoly rights primarily serve to protect corporate interests of the pharmaceutical industry. The broadest possible use of compulsory licenses is one of the essential measures that can contribute to increase in responsiveness to public interest considerations in defining the boundaries of the IP-related components that determine access to medicines. Another instrument is the process of interpretation and implementation of the Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights Agreement (TRIPS), which aims not only at clarifying the meaning of the provisions or determining the intentions of the parties to this treaty, but sets sights on reconciling its competing objectives. The need to interpret and implement the TRIPS Agreement in a way that protects public interest is confirmed by the obligation of acting “in a manner conducive to social and economic welfare” under Article 7 of the Agreement. Moreover, Article 8 allows to adopt “measures necessary to protect public health and nutrition, and to promote the public interest in sectors of vital importance to their socio-economic and technological development”. Therefore, in the context of the problem of access to medicines, the important role of human rights as an instrument for the prevention of abuse of intellectual property rights and the restoration of their balance, taking into account the interests of both the beneficiaries of protection and the general public, should be emphasized.


Author(s):  
Юлія Осипова

The article deals with the issue of determining the notion of intellectualproperty rights objects created on the basis of research agreements in higher educational institutions of Ukraine. To achieve the goal of research, the author provides answers, in particular, to the following questions: 1) what the subject-matter of basic and applied research, research and technological development (RTD) is; 2) what the results of these researches are and whatpossible forms of objectification of these results can be; and 3) what type of intellectual property rights objects can be created as a result of these researches.To solve those questions, the author has analyzed, in particular, such notions as: subject of the research agreement (Chapter 62 of the Civil Code of Ukraine); fundamental and applied scientific research; scientific (scientific-technical) work; scientific result; scientific and technical (applied) result; technology and object of technology.Based on this analysis, there have been determined the aims and subject-matters of the above-mentioned researches, their results and implementation of those results. Whereupon, the list of intellectual property rights objects, created on the basis research agreements, has been determined. Based on the obtained results, the author draws a conclusion about the types of intellectual property rights objects, created on the basis of research agreements in higher educational institutions of Ukraine. In particular, this category of objects should include intellectual property rights objects, created as a result of carrying out basic and applied researches, research and technological development (RTD) on the basis of research agreements, one of the parties to which is a higher educational institution of Ukraine. In addition, the list of this category of intellectual property rights objects should include: copyright, scientific discoveries, inventions, utility models, industrial designs, layout designs (topographies) of integrated circuits, plant varieties and animalbreeds, phonograms, videograms, performances and trade secret. However, trademarks, trade names, geographical indications, innovative proposals and broadcasts cannot result directly from basic and applied researches, research and technological development, so they are not included in the list of intellectual property rights objects, created on the basis of research agreements in higher educational institutionsof Ukraine.Also, suggestions to improve the legislation of Ukraine have been made.


2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (12) ◽  
pp. 1294-1306
Author(s):  
Nucharee Nuchkoom SMITH

Strong and fair intellectual property rights legislation is an essential foundation for the 4th industrial revolution. It is required to protect the increasingly rapid advances in all areas of technology and science as well as the pursuits of human endeavor. At the same time, countries must be allowed to adopt measures necessary to protect public health and nutrition and the public interest in sectors of vital importance to the socio-economic and technological development. Thailand is covered with the intellectual property treaties under both the World Intellectual Property Organization and the World Trade Organization. This paper describes the protections afforded under Thailand’s intellectual property laws. The analysis shows that the coverage of the Thai legislation is extensive and fairly robust-protecting the intellectual property rights of Thailand as well as those of the wider world community. However, there are some shortcomings. Copyright protections still do not fully protect performer’s rights. It has been argued also that the protection of the rights of breeders of new plant varieties should be enhanced and fashion designs specifically protected. Copyright violations are by far the major infringement of intellectual property right laws. This requires a rigorous and consistent enforcement regime. It must be acknowledged that the enforcement has improved over the last few years. This has been recognized by the United States Trade representatives who, in December 2017, moved Thailand from the priority Watchlist to its Watchlist because the country is able to resolve issues in and engage on intellectual property issues with the United States.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document