Towards Open Innovation in Universities: Fostering the Inside-Out-Process Using Ideas Competitions

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shkodran Zogaj ◽  
Philipp Kipp ◽  
Philipp Ebel ◽  
Ulrich Bretschneider ◽  
J. M. Leimeister
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elham Sahami ◽  
Ali Safari ◽  
Reza Ansari ◽  
Ali Shaemi Barzoki

Purpose In this study, an open innovation (OI) model was designed in which the organization’s human resource systems comprise the main core. To identify the various dimensions of the model, this study aims to investigate how and under what conditions the organizations update and upgrade their knowledge and experiences in the human capital (HC) systems domain within the OI framework and in line with sharing them with other organizations. Design/methodology/approach In this qualitative study, the data were collected by means of semi-structured interviews and analyzed through grounded theory, which led to the extraction of the final model. Findings The implementation of the HC-based OI helps upgrade knowledge in the organization and industry knowledge, create win-win relationships and increase the interaction capital, power and credit of the organization. Originality/value In this study, HC systems have been regarded as the core of the OI model (rather than an intervening factor in OI). This is the main innovative aspect of the current study. In addition, the special attention paid to the inside-out approach to OI and the examination of the human and social aspects of inter-organizational knowledge sharing – particularly in the light of the fact that the study was carried out in a developing country – are the other innovative aspects of this study.


Author(s):  
Kisoon Shin ◽  
Daeho Lee ◽  
Kwangsoo Shin ◽  
Eungdo Kim

The pharmaceutical industry, where research and development (R&D) efficiency is central to company survival, has recently faced significant challenges. To increase efficiency, companies must implement strategies such as open innovation (OI), wherein they sell their intellectual property, maximize their use of external resources, adjust their structures, and implement new business models. In this study, we divided 701 U.S. pharmaceutical companies according to their OI strategies to measure and compare their R&D efficiencies between 2001 and 2016. We analyzed the deal data of companies by first dividing them into four groups (inside-out, outside-in, coupled, and closed) to calculate R&D efficiency using stochastic and meta-frontier analyses. In the first group analysis, the coupled group shows high technical efficiency, but in an overall comparison, the inside-out group achieves the highest efficiency values. These values increased between 2005 and 2010, when the R&D crisis in the industry was great at its highest. We thus identified the characteristics of each group based on our results, and presented extensive analyses using a time-series comparison and enterprise-level analysis. We claim that pharmaceutical companies can still cope with the current R&D crisis by implementing different OI strategies.


2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 248
Author(s):  
Ashkan Rangamiztousi ◽  
Kamariah Bt Ismail

Open Innovation is a phenomenon that has become increasingly important due to found shorter innovation cycles, industrial R&D escalating costs as well as in the dearth of resources. Researchers have suggested various kinds of practices and ways to categorized them. However, most of prior studies only used some of the practices to measured open innovation, but the measurements were very generic as some practices are broadly defined, and the list of open innovation activities not included new activities and completed list of practices. Hence, it is crucial to identify a new list of open innovation practices and study on similar practices in developing countries to help their companies understand open innovation and its practices as well. This study reviewing prior studies on open innovation adoption published between 2003 and March 2014 and identified 36 different practices. Therefore, we created a new list of open innovation practices that cover most of strategies and practices mentioned in prior studies. This study used quantitative methodology, 400 high rank executives manager of Malaysia SMEs participated and completed the survey and further analyzed using the appropriate statistical procedures. The results indicated that Malaysian SMEs use three core processes of open innovation including coupled, outside-in, and inside-out practices in their open innovation processes, respectively. 


2019 ◽  
pp. 18-26
Author(s):  
AnnaMaria Lis ◽  
Adrian Lis
Keyword(s):  

Specyfika funkcjonowania inicjatyw klastrowych czyni z nich idealne podłoże do wcielania w życie idei open innovation - ułatwiają bowiem nawiązywanie kontaktów z innymi podmiotami, stawiają na otwartość swoich członków i budowę relacji opartych na zaufaniu, stanowią platformę wymiany zasobów (w tym przede wszystkim informacji i wiedzy) oraz wspólnego kreowania rozwiązań innowacyjnych. W artykule podjęto rozważania teoretyczne dotyczące wykorzystania koncepcji innowacji otwartych w inicjatywach klastrowych. Celem niniejszego artykułu jest przedstawienie powiązań poziomów współpracy klastrowej z elementami konstytuującymi innowacje otwarte. Główną metodą badawczą był przegląd literatury przedmiotu oraz teoretyczna aplikacja autorskiej koncepcji trajektorii rozwoju powiązań kooperacyjnych opracowanej na podstawie badań dotyczących współpracy w inicjatywach klastrowych i roli bliskości w rozwoju tejże współpracy. Rozważania przeprowadzone przez autorów potwierdziły istotność zaufania jako kryterium dostępu do najcenniejszych informacji i wiedzy w inicjatywach klastrowych. Wskazały również, że żaden z czterech wyróżnionych poziomów współpracy klastrowej nie korespondował z innowacjami otwartymi w formie "Inside-Out" (odśrodkowej). Poziomy współpracy I III mieściły się w obrębie ścieżki "Outside-In" (dośrodkowej), zaś poziomy II i IV korespondowały ze ścieżką "Coupled" (sprzężoną).


2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 21-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henry Chesbrough ◽  
Eric L. Chen

Pharmaceutical drug development costs have risen rapidly over the past twenty years.  However, the number of new molecular entities being approved has not increased.  As pharmaceutical companies scale back their R&D in light of this deteriorating productivity, significant unmet medical needs remain unaddressed.  Much of these rising costs can be traced to work on compounds that are abandoned before getting to market.  There is a growing need to recover these abandoned compounds. The inside-out branch of open innovation provides a way to increase the performance of pharmaceutical firms, both in addressing unmet societal needs, and potentially in identifying new revenue sources and business models for a more distributed model of commercializing new drugs.  This aspect of open innovation is not much discussed in the literature to date. The medical research community, in conjunction with a number of industry and nonprofit organizations, has started several projects to recover more abandoned compounds.  These new initiatives are still at an early stage, and have not received much critical evaluation to date.  Examining four of these initiatives, we find that they do extend the cognitive frames in the research phase, while doing less to extend those frames in the commercialization phase.


Author(s):  
Nuša FAIN ◽  
Beverly WAGNER

Open innovation has been described as a means of assisting firms utilising ideas and knowledge from inside and outside the firm.  It has been defined as “a distributed innovation process based on purposively managed knowledge flows across organisational boundaries, using pecuniary and non-pecuniary mechanisms in line with the organisations business model” (Chesbrough et al, 2014, p vi). Open innovation strategies may lead to better financial performance by reducing costs related to innovation, increasing commercialisation and financial gain. Understanding open innovation in some way explains how sharing knowledge with internal and external stakeholders can promote innovation.  Understanding processes can reinforce the importance of engaging with customers early in concept development and design stages of new products and services. Also openness can promote co-creation between firms, customers, suppliers, academia and government. The essence of such cooperation by internal and external stakeholders creates relationships to explore common interests and goals. From an open innovation perspective, value creation and capture is accomplished by (i) outside-in open innovation, i.e. ideas drawn into the organisation from the external environment. This involves opening up organisation’s innovation processes to external inputs and contributions, (ii) Inside-out open innovation utilises unused or underused ideas and assets gathered from outside the organisation and (iii) Coupled open innovation links outside-in and inside-out open innovation processes combining knowledge inflows and outflows to collaboratively develop and commercialise an innovation. Traditionally, knowledge is considered as being held by the firm as core competences and it is assumed that this is a source of sustainable competitive advantage. Accordingly knowledge used in, and resulting from, innovation and the knowledge resulting from the innovation remains within boundaries of the firm. Open innovation opposes this view as it integrates diverse knowledge from the wider environment into the business ecosystem and creates new knowledge for multiple stakeholders. Due to the inter-disciplinary nature of open innovation it can be discussed and theorised from many viewpoints, such as strategy, value chain, business models, core competencies, knowledge creation and more recently in design management. Levels of analysis vary with considerable research frequently conducted at organisational level, while more is needed in areas such as inter-organisational value networks. To date, large organisation have been at the focus of open innovation research, primarily because they are able implement open innovation to some degree without strategic change. More recently, open innovation practices in SMEs have become important, as these small firms have insufficient resources to cover all innovation activities and must look beyond firm boundaries for growth opportunities. Thus, inter-organisational networks are important drivers of innovation in SMEs as they often struggle to make the best use of strong network ties.  Exploring open innovation in SMEs can provide insight into how best to utilise their networks.


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (16) ◽  
pp. 4495 ◽  
Author(s):  
JinHyo Joseph Yun ◽  
EuiSeob Jeong ◽  
Xiaofei Zhao ◽  
Sung Deuk Hahm ◽  
KyungHun Kim

Responding to the lack of empirical research on the effect of collective intelligence on open innovation in the fourth industrial revolution, we examined the relationship between collective intelligence and open innovation. Collective intelligence or crowd innovation not only produces creative ideas or inventions, but also moderates any firm to innovate inside-out, outside-in, or in a coupled manner. We asked the following research questions: Does collective intelligence (or crowd innovation) motivate open innovation? Is there any difference in the effect of collective intelligence on open innovation by industry? These research questions led to the following three hypotheses: (1) Collective intelligence increases the performance of a firm, (2) collective intelligence will moderate the effect of open innovation, and (3) differences exist between the automotive industry and the pharmaceutical industry in these two effects. To empirically examine these three hypotheses, we analyzed the registered patents of these two industries from 2000 to 2014 over a 15-year period. These automotive and pharmaceutical patents were registered in the B60 category and the A61K category of the Korea Patent office, respectively. Collective intelligence was measured by co-invention. We found differences in the effects of collective intelligence on open innovation between the two industries. In the automotive industry, collective intelligence not only directly increased the performance, but also indirectly moderated the open innovation effect. However, this was not the case for the pharmaceutical industry.


SAGE Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 215824401880732 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elsa Grimsdottir ◽  
Ingi Runar Edvardsson

The aim of this article is to present findings on knowledge management (KM) and knowledge creation, as well as open innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in Iceland. Two SME company case studies are presented in the form of a case study involving semistructured interviews with managers and selected employees and in-field observation. Company Alpha is a software company, whereas Company Beta is a family company which produces drinks and snacks. Knowledge creation and innovation is a learning process in both companies. The two companies show very different open-innovation models in practice. The findings regarding the two companies are in accordance with the arguments of Chiaroni et al., where they state that high-tech companies tend to prefer inside-out strategies of open innovation, whereas low-tech companies prefer outside-in strategies. Company Alpha relates to customers late in the process, whereas Company Beta relies on knowledge from customers and suppliers and for new knowledge early on in the process.


Author(s):  
Henry Chesbrough ◽  
Chris Winter
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 169
Author(s):  
Fernando Almeida

This study aimed to explore the diversity of open-innovation practices that are adopted in Portuguese SMEs considering the outside-in, inside-out, and coupled paradigms. A quantitative study was carried out considering a sample of 187 Portuguese SMEs. The findings revealed that these organizations favored the adoption of the outside-in paradigm. The inside-out model was the least relevant, especially for smaller companies (i.e., small and micro-companies). The most adopted outside-in practices were the integration of external knowledge from suppliers and clients; in the inside-out model, licensing processes were more important; while in the coupled model, joint ventures and network consortiums stood out. The increase in the innovation capacity of these organizations was highlighted as the most relevant benefit, while the lack of resources and difficulties in integrating knowledge emerged as challenges. This study is especially relevant for the establishment of public-support policies that promote the involvement of Portuguese SMEs in open-innovation processes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document