Following the Open Source Trail Outside the Digital World: Open Source Applications in Agricultural Research and Development

Author(s):  
Elsa Tsioumani ◽  
Mike Muzurakis ◽  
Yannis Ieropoulos ◽  
Asterios Tsioumanis
Author(s):  
Elsa Tsioumani ◽  
Mike Muzurakis ◽  
Yannis Ieropoulos ◽  
Asterios Tsioumanis

In this article, we assess the application of the open-source development model in the field of agricultural research and development, as a potential tool for upholding both public scientific research, and farmer-led innovation and farmers’ rights. First, we provide an overview of the problems associated with the rise of IPRs in agriculture in view of global challenges such as food security and environmental sustainability, and present the debate on farmers’ rights, including its rationale and international policy and legal responses. We then review open source initiatives in the digital domain, including successes and shortcomings, and offer our understanding of relevant terminologies. We explore the parallels between software development and innovation in agriculture and review ongoing open-source agriculture-related initiatives. We particularly address the potential for open-source systems to address existing asymmetries in capabilities and contribute to global challenges such as food security.


Author(s):  
Charles B. Moss ◽  
Andrew Schmitz

Abstract The question of how to allocate scarce agricultural research and development dollars is significant for developing countries. Historically, benefit/cost analysis has been the standard for comparing the relative benefits of alternative investments. We examine the potential of shifting the implicit equal weights approach to benefit/cost analysis, as well as how a systematic variation in welfare weights may affect different groups important to policy makers. For example, in the case of Rwandan coffee, a shift in the welfare weights that would favor small coffee producers in Rwanda over foreign consumers of Rwandan coffee would increase the support for investments in small producer coffee projects. Generally, changes in welfare weights alter the ordering for selecting investments across alternative projects.


2010 ◽  
pp. 47-64
Author(s):  
Song Yiching ◽  
Zhang Shihuang ◽  
Huang Kaijian ◽  
Qin Lanqiun ◽  
Li Jingsong ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document