Impact of Corticosteroids on Short- and Long-Term Mortality in Patients with Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Meta-Analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chao Zhang
2013 ◽  
Vol 45 (8) ◽  
pp. 577-583 ◽  
Author(s):  
Merete Storgaard ◽  
Jesper Hallas ◽  
Bente Gahrn-Hansen ◽  
Svend S. Pedersen ◽  
Court Pedersen ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
TOH LEONG TAN ◽  
Ying Jing Tang ◽  
Ling Jing Ching ◽  
Noraidatulakma Abdullah ◽  
Hui-min Neoh

Objective: In year 2016, quick Sepsis-Related Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) was introduced as a better sepsis screening tool compared to systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the ability of the qSOFA in predicting short- and long-term mortality among patients outside the intensive care unit setting. Method: Studies reporting on the qSOFA and mortality from MEDLINE (published between 1946 and 15th December 2017) and SCOPUS (published before 15th December 2017). Hand-checking of the references of relevant articles was carried out. Studies were included if they involved inclusion of patients presenting to the ED; usage of Sepsis-3 definition with suspected infection; usage of qSOFA score for mortality prognostication; and written in English. Study details, patient demographics, qSOFA scores, short-term (<30 days) and long-term (≥30 days) mortality were extracted. Two reviewers conducted all reviews and data extraction independently. Results and Discussion: A total of 39 studies met the selection criteria for full text review and only 36 studies were inclided. Data on qSOFA scores and mortality rate were extracted from 36 studies from 15 countries. The pooled odds ratio was 5.5 and 4.7 for short-term and long-term mortality respectively. The overall pooled sensitivity and specificity for the qSOFA was 48% and 85% for short-term mortality and 32% and 92% for long-term mortality, respectively. Studies reporting on short-term mortality were heterogeneous (Tau=24%, I2=94%, P<0.001), while long-term mortality studies were homogenous (Tau=0%, I2<0.001, P=0.52). The factors contributing to heterogeneity may be wide age group, various clinical settings, variation in the timing of qSOFA scoring, and broad range of clinical diagnosis and criteria. There was no publication bias for short-term mortality analysis. Conclusion: qSOFA score showed a poor sensitivity but moderate specificity for both short and long-term mortality prediction in patients with suspected infection. qSOFA score may be a cost-effective tool for sepsis prognostication outside of the ICU setting.


2018 ◽  
Vol 44 (7) ◽  
pp. 1003-1016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sofie Louise Rygård ◽  
Ethan Butler ◽  
Anders Granholm ◽  
Morten Hylander Møller ◽  
Jeremy Cohen ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (7) ◽  
pp. 2513-2524 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rui Xu ◽  
Qian Wang ◽  
Yan Huang ◽  
Ling Wu ◽  
Qi Liu ◽  
...  

Objective This meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis (TSA) was performed to determine whether low-dose corticosteroids (LDCs) can improve survival or shock reversal from septic shock in adults. Methods A literature search was performed using several databases (Medline, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Chinese Biological Medical Database) until 23 October 2017. The systematic review was registered in PROSPERO. Results Nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (n = 1182) were included. LDC intervention improved 7-day shock reversal compared with the control group (relative risk, 1.36; TSA-adjusted 95% confidence interval, 1.20–1.54). LDCs had no statistically significant effects on gastrointestinal bleeding or superinfection. LDCs did not reduce 28-day mortality from septic shock (relative risk, 0.96; TSA-adjusted 95% confidence interval, 0.74–1.24). The TSA indicated that RCTs of about 3000 patients would be needed to draw definitive conclusions; similar results were obtained in a subgroup analysis of nonresponders. Conclusions LDCs improve 7-day shock reversal. However, whether LDCs improve 28-day survival from septic shock in adults remains unclear. The results of well-designed larger RCTs are needed.


Author(s):  
Merete Storgaard ◽  
Jesper Hallas ◽  
Bente Gahrn-Hansen ◽  
Svend Stenvang Pedersen ◽  
Court K Pedersen ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 198 ◽  
pp. 123-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chirag Bavishi ◽  
Sripal Bangalore ◽  
Dipen Patel ◽  
Saurav Chatterjee ◽  
Vrinda Trivedi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document