Monetary policy and fiscal policy are sister strategies that
can be used alone and in combination to direct the economic goals. In
the literature relative efficacy of fiscal and monetary policy has been
studied extensively. Friedman and Meiselman (1963), Ansari (1996),
Reynolds (2000, 2001), Chari, et al. (1991, 1998), Schmitt and Uribe
(2001a), Shapiro and Watson (1988), Blanchard and Perroti (1996),
Christiano, et al. (1996), Chari and Kehoe (1998), Kim (1997), Chowdhury
(1986, 1988), Chowdhury, et al. (1986), Weeks (1999), Feldstein (2002)
and Cardia (1991) have examined the impact of fiscal and monetary
policies on various economic aggregates. However, the bulk of
theoretical and empirical research has not reached on conclusion
concerning the relative power of fiscal and monetary policy to effect
economic growth. Some researchers find support for the monetarist view,
which suggests that monetary policy generally has a greater impact on
economic growth and dominates fiscal policy in terms of its impact on
investment and growth. [Friedman and Meiselman (1963); Ajaye (1974);
Elliot (1975); Batten and Hafer (1983)], while other argued that fiscal
stimulates are crucial for economic growth. [Chowdhury (1986); Olaloye
and Ikhide (1995)], On the other hand, according to Cardia (1991)
macroeconomic activities are largely explained by some other variables.
The experiment of 1970s clearly demonstrates that a policy mix produced
only stagflation. Some economist took keen interest in money by
combining Keynesian neoclassical mixture which is called the “funnel”
theory by James Tobin. The argument was that tax rate and money growth
simultaneously leads to stagflation thus the Government could choose
either fiscal or monetary policy stimulus which will enhance growth.
[Reynolds (2001)].
Impact of fiscal and monetary policy on economic growth in Vietnam