Overachieving and Obsessive Behavior as Signaling Devices under Career Concern

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Rodivilov ◽  
Dongsoo Shin ◽  
Xiaojian Zhao
Keyword(s):  
1988 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 82-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark L Savickas ◽  
Andrew J Passen ◽  
David G Jarjoura

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 4775 ◽  
Author(s):  
Graziano Abrate ◽  
Federico Boffa ◽  
Fabrizio Erbetta ◽  
Davide Vannoni

This paper explores the link between voters’ information, corruption, and efficiency in the context of a career concern model, where politically connected local monopolies are in charge of the provision of a local public service. We find that both a corrupt environment and a low level of voters’ information on managerial actions induce managers to reduce effort levels, thereby contributing to drive down efficiency. We test our predictions using data on solid waste management services provided by a large sample of Italian municipalities. We estimate a stochastic cost frontier model that provides robust evidence that services produced in more corrupted regions with low voters’ information are substantially less cost-efficient.


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
T-Y Wang ◽  
C-M Liu
Keyword(s):  

.


Author(s):  
Jinkook Tak ◽  
Green Lim ◽  
Eunhye Lee ◽  
Iljin Jung

This study was intended to develop and validate the Korean version of the Adult Career Concern Inventory. 147 items and 19 factors of the inventory were obtained based on open-ended questionnaires. A preliminary on-line survey from 336 employees was carried to collect data. Exploratory factor analyses excluded two factors such as person-environment fit and hobby and resulted into 115 items and 17 factors. To test the validity of the career concern inventory, the main on-line survey was carried and the questionnares were collected from 1091 employees. In order to check cross-validity of the scale, the total group was divided into two sub-groups: Group 1, 546 employees, and Group 2, 545 employees. The results of confirmatory factor analyses of Group 1 showed that the 16-factor model fit the data better after the vision-on-the-job factor was eliminated together with some items, which finally resulted in 94 items and 16 factors. These 16 factors were as follows: 1) retirement, 2) career management, 3) work-family balance, 4) interpersonal relations, 5) turnover, 6) health, 7) job performance stress, 8) establishing a business, 9) indecisive attitude, 10) promotion, 11) economic issue, 12) service, 13) marriage issue, 14) work sustainability, 15) competence improvement, and 16) lack of professionalism. The career concern inventory was significantly correlated with various criteria such as performance, job satisfaction, organizational commitment, career satisfaction, career commitment, mental health, life satisfaction etc. Finally, implications and limitations of this study and the directions for future study were discussed.


1983 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victoria Berger-Gross ◽  
Matthew W. Kahn ◽  
Constance R. Weare
Keyword(s):  

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dongsoo Shin ◽  
Xiaojian Zhao
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 206-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melinde Coetzee ◽  
Dries Schreuder

The study explored whether the positive links between individuals’ psychosocial career attributes and career adaptability resources empirically represent the characteristics associated with proactive career self-management behaviour. A cross-sectional convenience sample of Black and White ( N = 248) working adults participated in the study. The redundancy analysis of the canonical correlation analysis indicated positive links between the career attributes of behavioural adaptability, career directedness, self-esteem, self/other skills, social connectivity, and career purpose, and the four career adaptability resources of career concern, career control, career curiosity, and career confidence. The common synthetic themes that emerged from the positive associations described the characteristics of proactive career self-management behaviour, including (1) self-efficacious adaptive goal-directed behaviour, (2) proactive psychosocial career engagement behaviour, and (3) career resilience. The three dimensions offer considerations for practitioners involved in career development and counselling discussions with employees who need to develop personal agency in their career development and management.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document