Mortality, length of hospitalization, and costs associated with invasive fungal infections in high-risk patients

Abstract Background Usefulness of β-d-glucan (BDG) testing in high-risk patients for invasive fungal infection (IFI) diagnosis has been well demonstrated. However, data on its usefulness in patients without risk factors are limited. We evaluated differences in the diagnostic performance of BDG testing in patients with varying degrees of susceptibility to IFI. Methods From April 2017 to May 2018, all consecutive patients (≥18year-old) who were performed BDG testing (Beijing Gold Mountainriver Tech) were enrolled. Patients were classified into three groups: Group A for patients with host factors defined by 2008 European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Mycoses Study Group diagnostic (EORTC-MSG) criteria, Group B for patients with malignancy receiving recent chemotherapy within 1 month without host factors, and Group C for others. Cases of proven and probable IFI defined by EORTC-MSG criteria, Pneumocystis pneumonia and all fungemia were considered as true IFIs. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value (PPV and NPV) were calculated with a cut-off value for positivity ≥80 pg/mL. Results Among 473 eligible patients, 190, 142, and 141 patients were classified into group A, B, and C, respectively. Rates of true IFI were significantly different in each group (57/190, 19/142, and 10/141 in each group, P < 0.001). Sensitivities were 0.83, 0.68, and 0.70 and specificities were 0.62, 0.59, and 0.63 in group A, B, and C, respectively. PPVs were considerably different among three groups (PPV for 0.48, 0.20, and 0.12; NPV for 0.89, 0.92 and 0.97 in each group, respectively). Conclusion The BDG test is a useful assay for IFI diagnosis; however, the clinical interpretation should be different by patient risks. Whereas BDG testing could be considered as a tool for predicting IFI in high-risk patients, it only could be a tool for excluding IFI in patient without risk factors. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Download Full-text

Is Antifungal Prophylaxis Useful In Stem Cell Transplantation (SCT) During Hospitalization?.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.4541.4541 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 4541-4541

Author(s):

Giuseppe Irrera ◽

Messina Giuseppe ◽

Giuseppe Console ◽

Massimo Martino ◽

Cuzzola Maria ◽

...

Keyword(s):

High Risk ◽

Conflicts Of Interest ◽

Fungal Infections ◽

Mucosal Damage ◽

Invasive Disease ◽

Secondary Prophylaxis ◽

Antifungal Prophylaxis ◽

Antifungal Drugs ◽

High Risk Patients ◽

Risk Patients

Abstract Abstract 4541 Introduction: Limited data demonstrate to what extent preventing fungal exposures is effective in preventing infection and disease. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal duration of fluconazole prophylaxis in allogeneic recipients to prevent invasive disease with fluconazole-susceptible Candida species during neutropenia. Oral, nonabsorbable antifungal drugs might reduce superficial colonization and control local mucosal candidiasis, but have not been demonstrated to reduce invasive candidiasis. Anti-fungal prophylaxis is recommended in a subpopulation of autologous recipients with underlying hematologic malignancies with prolonged neutropenia and mucosal damage. Methods: This is a retrospective study of 1007 SCT performed in our center between 1992 and 2009 in 809 consecutive patients, irrespective of diagnosis. HEPA filter and environmental monitoring (air, water, surfaces) are attributes of our transplant center. Results: The main characteristics of the patients are reported in Table 1. Systemic prophylaxis was used according to the guidelines (Table 2): fluconazole in the nineties, then itraconazole and from 2004 was either abolished or substituted with non-adsorbable prophylaxis in transplants with standard risk. Secondary prophylaxis was prescribed for high risk patients (with infectious fungal history, suggestive iconography, positive fungal biomarker). In 17 years our Center has never been colonized by mould. Only 3 probable aspergillosis infections and 4 proven fungal infections (fusarium, mucor and 2 aspergillosis) were diagnosed, all in allogeneic patients (2 haplotipical, 1 singenic, 1 sibiling, 1 MUD and 2 mismatched), resulting in death in all cases. No infection was documented in autologous setting, while the infection rate in allogenic setting was 3.6% with an incidence rate of 1.1 infection per 10000 transplants/year. These results are significantly lower than published reports. Conclusion: Systemic antifungal prophylaxis should not be performed in autologous SCT patients. The abuse of systemic prophylaxis targeting yeasts has influenced the change of epidemiology in the transplant setting with prevalence of mould infections. The identification of high risk patients is useful to select patients for systemic antifungal or secondary prophylaxis to reducing overtreatment, incidence of resistant strains and costs. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Phase 1b Study of New Posaconazole Tablet for Prevention of Invasive Fungal Infections in High-Risk Patients with Neutropenia

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy ◽

10.1128/aac.03050-14 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 58 (10) ◽

pp. 5758-5765 ◽

Cited By ~ 69

Author(s):

Rafael F. Duarte ◽

Javier López-Jiménez ◽

Oliver A. Cornely ◽

Michel Laverdiere ◽

David Helfgott ◽

...

Keyword(s):

High Risk ◽

Fungal Infections ◽

Average Concentration ◽

Myelogenous Leukemia ◽

Time Curve ◽

Once Daily ◽

High Risk Patients ◽

Exposure Target ◽

Risk Patients ◽

Neutropenic Patients

ABSTRACTPosaconazole tablets, a new oral formulation of posaconazole, can be effective when given as antifungal prophylaxis to neutropenic patients at high risk for invasive fungal infection (e.g., those with acute myelogenous leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome). Such effectiveness might be specifically important to patients with poor oral intake because of nausea, vomiting, or chemotherapy-associated mucositis. This was a prospective, global study in high-risk patients to characterize the pharmacokinetics and safety profile of posaconazole tablets and to identify the dose of posaconazole tablets that would provide exposure within a predefined range of exposures (steady-state average concentration [area under the concentration-time curve/24 h] of ≥500 ng/ml and ≤2,500 ng/ml in >90% of patients). The study evaluated two sequential dosing cohorts: 200 mg posaconazole once daily (n= 20) and 300 mg posaconazole once daily (n= 34) (both cohorts had a twice-daily loading dose on day 1) taken without regard to food intake during the neutropenic period for ≤28 days. The exposure target was reached (day 8) in 15 of 19 (79%) pharmacokinetic-evaluable patients taking 200 mg posaconazole once daily and in 31 of 32 (97%) patients taking 300 mg posaconazole once daily; 300 mg posaconazole once daily achieved the desired exposure target. Posaconazole tablets were generally well tolerated in high-risk neutropenic patients. (This study has been registered atClinicalTrials.govunder registration no. NCT01777763.)

Download Full-text