scholarly journals Time-variable medical education innovation in context

2018 ◽  
Vol Volume 9 ◽  
pp. 469-481 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher D Stamy ◽  
Christine C Schwartz ◽  
Danielle A Phillips ◽  
Aparna S Ajjarapu ◽  
Kristi J Ferguson ◽  
...  
CJEM ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 463-470 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew K. Hall ◽  
Carly Hagel ◽  
Teresa M. Chan ◽  
Brent Thoma ◽  
Aleisha Murnaghan ◽  
...  

AbstractObjectiveThe scholarly dissemination of innovative medical education practices helps broaden the reach of this type of work, allowing scholarship to have an impact beyond a single institution. There is little guidance in the literature for those seeking to publish program evaluation studies and innovation papers. This study aims to derive a set of evidence-based features of high-quality reports on innovations in emergency medicine (EM) education.MethodsWe conducted a scoping review and thematic analysis to determine quality markers for medical education innovation reports, with a focus on EM. A search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, ERIC, and Google Scholar was augmented by a hand search of relevant publication guidelines, guidelines for authors, and website submission portals from medical education and EM journals. Study investigators reviewed the selected articles, and a thematic analysis was conducted.ResultsOur search strategy identified 14 relevant articles from which 34 quality markers were extracted. These markers were grouped into seven important themes: goals and need for innovation, preparation, innovation development, innovation implementation, evaluation of innovation, evidence of reflective practice, and reporting and dissemination. In addition, multiple outlets for the publication of EM education innovations were identified and compiled.ConclusionThe publication and dissemination of innovations are critical for the EM education community and the training of health professionals. We anticipate that our list of innovation report quality markers will be used by EM education innovators to support the dissemination of novel educational practices.


2013 ◽  
Vol 88 (3) ◽  
pp. 398-404 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik Jippes ◽  
Yvonne Steinert ◽  
Jan Pols ◽  
Marjolein C. Achterkamp ◽  
Jo M.L. van Engelen ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 93 (3S) ◽  
pp. S17-S21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Larry D. Gruppen ◽  
Olle ten Cate ◽  
Lorelei A. Lingard ◽  
Pim W. Teunissen ◽  
Jennifer R. Kogan

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Holly A. Caretta-Weyer ◽  
Teresa Chan ◽  
Blair L. Bigham ◽  
Benjamin Kinnear ◽  
Sören Huwendiek ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 90 (6) ◽  
pp. 827-831 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shelley R. Adler ◽  
Anna Chang ◽  
Helen Loeser ◽  
Molly Cooke ◽  
Jason Wang ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Motahareh Tavakolikashi ◽  
Sarah Hallen ◽  
Melissa I Zelaya-Floyd ◽  
Patricia White ◽  
Kalli Varaklis ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Van Schalkwyk ◽  
Juanita Bezuidenhout ◽  
Hoffie Conradie ◽  
Therese Fish ◽  
Norma Kok ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Jessica M DeWitt ◽  
Joslyn Richards ◽  
Hedy S Wald ◽  
TR Wyatt ◽  
Marcel F D'Eon

Implication Statement The Education Innovation Institute (EII) of Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, hosted a conference on Twitter about Professional Identity Formation (PIF), #MCGConf2021PIF, on February 25, 2021. The conference featured five presentations by 15 authors from Canada and the U.S. A Twitter conference is a versatile, affordable, and accessible digital option for medical education groups interested in diversifying conference offerings and reaching a broader audience. It was low-cost, organized in six months, and garnered over 9,000 Twitter impressions. Small networks and interest groups can organize Twitter conferences for their constituencies and larger conference organizations can host online mini-conferences to supplement in-person events.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document