scholarly journals The writer’s guide to education scholarship in emergency medicine: Education innovations (part 3)

CJEM ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 463-470 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew K. Hall ◽  
Carly Hagel ◽  
Teresa M. Chan ◽  
Brent Thoma ◽  
Aleisha Murnaghan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Medicine ◽  
Medical Education ◽  
Thematic Analysis ◽  
Evaluation Studies ◽  
Hand Search ◽  
Report Quality ◽  
Quality Markers ◽  
Education Innovation ◽  
Relevant Publication ◽  
Publication Guidelines

AbstractObjectiveThe scholarly dissemination of innovative medical education practices helps broaden the reach of this type of work, allowing scholarship to have an impact beyond a single institution. There is little guidance in the literature for those seeking to publish program evaluation studies and innovation papers. This study aims to derive a set of evidence-based features of high-quality reports on innovations in emergency medicine (EM) education.MethodsWe conducted a scoping review and thematic analysis to determine quality markers for medical education innovation reports, with a focus on EM. A search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, ERIC, and Google Scholar was augmented by a hand search of relevant publication guidelines, guidelines for authors, and website submission portals from medical education and EM journals. Study investigators reviewed the selected articles, and a thematic analysis was conducted.ResultsOur search strategy identified 14 relevant articles from which 34 quality markers were extracted. These markers were grouped into seven important themes: goals and need for innovation, preparation, innovation development, innovation implementation, evaluation of innovation, evidence of reflective practice, and reporting and dissemination. In addition, multiple outlets for the publication of EM education innovations were identified and compiled.ConclusionThe publication and dissemination of innovations are critical for the EM education community and the training of health professionals. We anticipate that our list of innovation report quality markers will be used by EM education innovators to support the dissemination of novel educational practices.

scholarly journals A writer’s guide to education scholarship: Quantitative methodologies for medical education research (part 1)

CJEM ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 125-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brent Thoma ◽  
Paola Camorlinga ◽  
Teresa M. Chan ◽  
Andrew Koch Hall ◽  
Aleisha Murnaghan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medical Education ◽  
Thematic Analysis ◽  
Full Text ◽  
Quantitative Research ◽  
Quantitative Methods ◽  
English Language ◽  
Reporting Guidelines ◽  
Hand Search ◽  
Quality Markers ◽  
Full Text Review

AbstractBackgroundQuantitative research is one of the many research methods used to help educators advance their understanding of questions in medical education. However, little research has been done on how to succeed in publishing in this area.ObjectiveWe conducted a scoping review to identify key recommendations and reporting guidelines for quantitative educational research and scholarship.MethodsMedline, ERIC, and Google Scholar were searched for English-language articles published between 2006 and January 2016 using the search terms, “research design,” “quantitative,” “quantitative methods,” and “medical education.” A hand search was completed for additional references during the full-text review. Titles/abstracts were reviewed by two authors (BT, PC) and included if they focused on quantitative research in medical education and outlined reporting guidelines, or provided recommendations on conducting quantitative research. One hundred articles were reviewed in parallel with the first 30 used for calibration and the subsequent 70 to calculate Cohen’s kappa coefficient. Two reviewers (BT, PC) conducted a full text review and extracted recommendations and reporting guidelines. A simple thematic analysis summarized the extracted recommendations.ResultsSixty-one articles were reviewed in full, and 157 recommendations were extracted. The thematic analysis identified 86 items, 14 categories, and 3 themes. Fourteen quality evaluation tools and reporting guidelines were found.DiscussionThis paper provides guidance for junior researchers in the form of key quality markers and reporting guidelines. We hope that quantitative researchers in medical education will be informed by the results and that further work will be done to refine the list of recommendations.

scholarly journals The writer’s guide to education scholarship in emergency medicine: Systematic reviews and the scholarship of integration (part 4)

CJEM ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 626-633
Author(s):  
Aleisha Murnaghan ◽  
Kristen Weersink ◽  
Brent Thoma ◽  
Andrew K. Hall ◽  
Teresa Chan
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Medicine ◽  
English Language ◽  
Educational Practice ◽  
Reporting Guidelines ◽  
Hand Search ◽  
Quality Markers ◽  
Full Text Review ◽  
Scholarly Teaching ◽  
Medicine Education ◽  
Education Review

ABSTRACTObjectiveReviews help scholars consolidate evidence and guide their educational practice. However, few papers describe how to effectively publish review papers. We completed a scoping review to develop a set of quality indicators that will assist junior authors to publish reviews and integrative scholarship.MethodsMEDLINE, Embase, ERIC, and Google Scholar were searched for English language articles published between 2012 and January 2016 using the termsreview,medical education,how to publish, andemergency medicine. Titles and abstracts were reviewed by two authors and included if they focused on how to publish a review or outlined reporting guidelines of reviews. The articles were reviewed in parallel for calibration, and disagreements were resolved through a consensus.ResultsA full text review of the 25 articles was conducted, and 196 recommendations were extracted from 13 articles. A hand search of the included articles’ reference lists and expert recommendation found an additional eight articles. These recommendations were thematically analysed into a list of seven themes and 32 items. Additionally, seven evaluation tools and reporting guidelines were found to guide researchers in optimizing their reviews for publication.ConclusionIn emergency medicine education, review articles can help synthesize educational research so that educators can engage in evidence-based scholarly teaching. We hope that this work will act as an introduction to those interested in engaging in integrative scholarship by providing them with a guide to key quality markers and important checklists for improving their research.

scholarly journals Implementing Competency-Based Medical Education in Family Medicine: A Narrative Review of Current Trends in Assessment

2021 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-22
Author(s):  
Natalia Danilovich ◽  
Simon Kitto ◽  
David W. Price ◽  
Craig Campbell ◽  
Amanda Hodgson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medical Education ◽  
Family Medicine ◽  
Thematic Analysis ◽  
Evaluation Studies ◽  
Continuing Professional Development ◽  
Assessment Methods ◽  
Integrated System ◽  
Narrative Review ◽  
Competency Based Medical Education ◽  
Competency Based

Background and Objectives: The implementation of effective competency-based medical education (CBME) relies on building a coherent and integrated system of assessment across the continuum of training to practice. As such, the developmental progression of competencies must be assessed at all stages of the learning process, including continuing professional development (CPD). Yet, much of the recent discussion revolves mostly around residency programs. The purpose of this review is to synthesize the findings of studies spanning the last 2 decades that examined competency-based assessment methods used in family medicine residency and CPD, and to identify gaps in their current practices. Methods: We adopted a modified form of narrative review and searched five online databases and the gray literature for articles published between 2000 and 2020. Data analysis involved mixed methods including quantitative frequency analysis and qualitative thematic analysis. Results: Thirty-seven studies met inclusion criteria. Fourteen were formal evaluation studies that focused on the outcome and impact evaluation of assessment methods. Articles that focused on formative assessment were prevalent. The most common levels of educational outcomes were performance and competence. There were few studies on CBME assessment among practicing family physicians. Thematic analysis of the literature identified several challenges the family medicine educational community faces with CBME assessment. Conclusions: We recommend that those involved in health education systematically evaluate and publish their CBME activities, including assessment-related content and evaluations. The highlighted themes may offer insights into ways in which current CBME assessment practices might be improved to align with efforts to improve health care.’

52. Simulation based training improves resident competence in the performance of critical resuscitation procedures

2007 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 56
Author(s):  
I. Rigby ◽  
I. Walker ◽  
T. Donnon ◽  
D. Howes ◽  
J. Lord
Keyword(s):  
Internal Medicine ◽  
Emergency Medicine ◽  
Medical Education ◽  
Family Medicine ◽  
Training Program ◽  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Training Programs ◽  
Self Assessment ◽  
Procedural Skills ◽  
Simulation Based

We sought to assess the impact of procedural skills simulation training on residents’ competence in performing critical resuscitation skills. Our study was a prospective, cross-sectional study of residents from three residency training programs (Family Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Internal Medicine) at the University of Calgary. Participants completed a survey measuring competence in the performance of the procedural skills required to manage hemodynamic instability. The study intervention was an 8 hour simulation based training program focused on resuscitation procedure psychomotor skill acquisition. Competence was criterion validated at the Right Internal Jugular Central Venous Catheter Insertion station by an expert observer using a standardized checklist (Observed Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) format). At the completion of the simulation course participants repeated the self-assessment survey. Descriptive Statistics, Cronbach’s alpha, Pearson’s correlation coefficient and Paired Sample t-test statistical tools were applied to the analyze the data. Thirty-five of 37 residents (9 FRCPC Emergency Medicine, 4 CCFP-Emergency Medicine, 17 CCFP, and 5 Internal Medicine) completed both survey instruments and the eight hour course. Seventy-two percent of participants were PGY-1 or 2. Mean age was 30.7 years of age. Cronbach’s alpha for the survey instrument was 0.944. Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient was 0.69 (p < 0.001) for relationship between Expert Assessment and Self-Assessment. The mean improvement in competence score pre- to post-intervention was 6.77 (p < 0.01, 95% CI 5.23-8.32). Residents from a variety of training programs (Internal Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Family Medicine) demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in competence with critical resuscitation procedural skills following an intensive simulation based training program. Self-assessment of competence was validated using correlation data based on expert assessments. Dawson S. Procedural simulation: a primer. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2006; 17(2.1):205-13. Vozenilek J, Huff JS, Reznek M, Gordon JA. See one, do one, teach one: advanced technology in medical education. Acad Emerg Med. 2004; 11(11):1149-54. Ziv A, Wolpe PR, Small SD, Glick S. Simulation-based medical education: an ethical imperative. Acad Med. 2003; 78(8):783-8.

scholarly journals The Uncertainty of COVID-19 Inducing Social Fear and Pressure on the Continuity of Rural, Community-Based Medical Education: A Thematic Analysis

Healthcare ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 223
Author(s):  
Ryuichi Ohta ◽  
Yoshinori Ryu ◽  
Chiaki Sano
Keyword(s):  
Medical Education ◽  
Direct Observation ◽  
Rural Community ◽  
Thematic Analysis ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Postgraduate Students ◽  
Medical Trainees ◽  
Rural Settings ◽  
Social Fear ◽  
Medical Educators

Rural community-based medical education (CBME) enriches undergraduate and postgraduate students’ learning but has been impacted by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. We identified the challenges faced by stakeholders as well as the relevant solutions to provide recommendations for sustainable CBME in community hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic. A total of 31 pages of field and reflection notes were collated through direct observation and used for analysis. Five physicians, eight nurses, one clerk, fourteen medical trainees, and three rural citizens were interviewed between 1 April and 30 September 2020. The interviews were recorded and their contents were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using thematic analysis. Three themes emerged: uncertainty surrounding COVID-19, an overwhelming sense of social fear and pressure within and outside communities, and motivation and determination to continue providing CBME. Rural CBME was impacted by not only the fear of infection but also social fear and pressure within and outside communities. Constant assessment of the risks associated with the pandemic and the implications for CMBE is essential to ensure the sustainability of CBME in rural settings, not only for medical educators and students but also stakeholders who administrate rural CBME.

scholarly journals A Descriptive Analysis of the Use of Twitter by Emergency Medicine Residency Programs

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Diller ◽  
Lalena M. Yarris
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Medicine ◽  
Medical Education ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Descriptive Statistics ◽  
Mixed Methods Study ◽  
Instructional Tool ◽  
Residency Programs ◽  
The Public ◽  
Twitter Account ◽  
E Mail

ABSTRACT Background  Twitter is increasingly recognized as an instructional tool by the emergency medicine (EM) community. In 2012, the Council of Residency Directors in Emergency Medicine (CORD) recommended that EM residency programs' Twitter accounts be managed solely by faculty. To date, little has been published regarding the patterns of Twitter use by EM residency programs. Objective  We analyzed current patterns in Twitter use among EM residency programs with accounts and assessed conformance with CORD recommendations. Methods  In this mixed methods study, a 6-question, anonymous survey was distributed via e-mail using SurveyMonkey. In addition, a Twitter-based search was conducted, and the public profiles of EM residency programs' Twitter accounts were analyzed. We calculated descriptive statistics and performed a qualitative analysis on the data. Results  Of 168 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education–accredited EM programs, 88 programs (52%) responded. Of those programs, 58% (51 of 88) reported having a program-level Twitter account. Residents served as content managers for those accounts in the majority of survey respondents (61%, 28 of 46). Most programs did not publicly disclose the identity or position of their Twitter content manager. We found a wide variety of applications for Twitter, with EM programs most frequently using Twitter for educational and promotional purposes. There is significant variability in the numbers of followers for EM programs' Twitter accounts. Conclusions  Applications and usage among EM residency programs are varied, and are frequently not consistent with current CORD recommendations.

scholarly journals P026: Need for training in medical education: staff emergency physician perspectives

CJEM ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (S1) ◽  
pp. S86
Author(s):  
J. Bryan ◽  
F. Al Rawi ◽  
T. Bhandari ◽  
J. Chu ◽  
S. Hansen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Medicine ◽  
Medical Education ◽  
Adult Education ◽  
Family Medicine ◽  
Graduate Training ◽  
Formal Training ◽  
Emergency Physicians ◽  
Allied Health Professionals ◽  
Evaluation Time ◽  
Post Graduate Training

Introduction: Emergency medicine physicians in our urban/suburban area have a range of training in medical education; some have no formal training in medical education, whereas others have completed Master’s level training in adult education. Not all staff have a university appointment; of those who are affiliated with our university, 87 have appointments through the Department of Medicine, 21 through the Department of Pediatrics, and 117 through the Department of Family Medicine. Emergency physicians in our area are a diverse group of physicians in terms of both formal training in adult education and in the variety of settings in which we work. The purpose of this study was to gauge interest in formal training in adult education among emergency medicine physicians. Methods: With research ethics board approval, we created and sent a 10-item electronic questionnaire to emergency medicine staff in our area. The questionnaire included items on demographics, experience in emergency medicine, additional post-graduate training, current teaching activities and interest in short (30-60 minute) adult education sessions. Results: Of a potential 360 active emergency physicians in our area, 120 responded to the questionnaire (33.3%), representing 12 area hospitals. Nearly half of respondents had been in practice over 10 years (48.44%). Respondents were mainly FRCP (50%) or CCFP-EM (47.50%) trained. 33.3% of respondents had masters degrees, of which 15% were MEd. Most physicians were involved in teaching medical students (98.33%), FRCP residents (80%) and family medicine residents (88.3%), though many were also teaching off-service residents, and allied health professionals. More than half of respondents (60%) were interested in attending short sessions to improve their skills as adult educators. The topics of most interest were feedback and evaluation, time-efficient teaching, the learner in difficulty, case-based teaching and bedside teaching. Conclusion: Emergency physicians in our area have a wide variety of experience and training in medical education. They are involved in teaching learners from a range of training levels and backgrounds. Physicians who responded to our survey expressed an interest in additional formal teaching on adult education topics geared toward emergency medicine.

Highlights in Emergency Medicine Medical Education Research: 2008

2009 ◽  
Vol 16 (12) ◽  
pp. 1318-1324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan E. Farrell ◽  
Wendy C. Coates ◽  
Gloria J. Khun ◽  
Jonathan Fisher ◽  
Philip Shayne ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Medicine ◽  
Medical Education ◽  
Education Research ◽  
Medical Education Research

scholarly journals P150: Emergency medicine resident perspectives on journal club as a community of practice and its impact on clinical medicine

CJEM ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (S1) ◽  
pp. S110-S110
Author(s):  
D. K. Ting ◽  
B. Bailey ◽  
F. Scheuermeyer ◽  
T. M. Chan ◽  
D. R. Harris
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Medicine ◽  
Medical Education ◽  
Focus Group ◽  
Community Of Practice ◽  
Journal Club ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Pilot Testing ◽  
Emergency Medicine Resident ◽  
Medicine Resident ◽  
Select Group

Introduction: Despite revolutionary changes in the medical education landscape, journal club (JC) continues to be a ubiquitous pedagogical tool and is a primary way that residency programs review new evidence and teach evidence-based medicine. JC is a community of practice among physicians, which may help translate research findings into practice. Program representatives state that JC should have a goal of translating novel research into changes in clinical care, but there has been minimal evaluation of the success of JC in achieving this goal. Specifically, emergency medicine resident perspectives on the utility of JC remain unknown. Methods: We designed a multi-centre qualitative study for three distinct academic environments at the University of British Columbia (Vancouver, Victoria and Kelowna). Pilot testing was performed to generate preliminary themes and to finalize the interview script. An exploratory, semi-structured focus group was performed, followed by multiple one-on-one interviews using snowball sampling. Iterative thematic analysis directed data collection until thematic sufficiency was achieved. Analysis was conducted using a constructivist Grounded Theory method with communities of practice as a theoretical lens. Themes were compared to the existing literature to corroborate or challenge existing educational theory. Results: Pilot testing has revealed the following primary themes: (1) Only select residents are able to increase their participation in JC over the course of residency and navigate the transition from peripheral participant to core member; (2) These residents use their increased clinical experience to perceive relevance in JC topics, and; (3) Residents who remain peripheral participants identify a lack time to prepare for journal club and a lack of staff physician attendance as barriers to resident engagement. We will further develop these themes during the focus group and interview phases of our study. Conclusion: JC is a potentially valuable educational resource for residents. JC works as a community of practice only for a select group of residents, and many remain peripheral participants for the duration of their residency. Incorporation of Free Open-Access Medical Education resources may also decrease preparation time for residents and staff physicians and increase buy-in. To augment clinical impact, the JC community of practice may need to expand beyond emergency medicine and include other specialties.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document