scholarly journals A Real-World Analysis of Treatment Patterns and Clinical Characteristics Among Patients with COPD Who Initiated Multiple-Inhaler Triple Therapy in New Zealand

2021 ◽  
Vol Volume 16 ◽  
pp. 1835-1850
Author(s):  
Xiaomeng Xu ◽  
Dominique Milea ◽  
Aldo Amador Navarro Rojas ◽  
Anthony Braganza ◽  
Tim Holbrook ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. S284
Author(s):  
L. Kathmann ◽  
J. Roeper ◽  
K. Wedeken ◽  
K. Willborn ◽  
F. Griesinger

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21717-e21717
Author(s):  
Ashley Tabah ◽  
David Huggar ◽  
Jonathan Kish ◽  
Bela Bapat ◽  
Djibril Liassou ◽  
...  

e21717 Background: Pem+carbo+pac or nab-pac are approved first-line (1L) treatments for metastatic squamous NSCLC since 10/30/2018. Difference in real-world outcomes of these triplet combinations are unknown. Methods: Providers from community oncology practices in the USA reviewed the charts of consecutive NSCLC patients initiating 1L treatment with either pem+carbo+pac (“pac”) or pem+carbor+nab-pac (“nab-pac”) from 06/01/18-12/31/18; data were collected 11/22/2019-12/23/2019. Patient characteristics, treatment patterns, grade 3/4 toxicities, disease response, date of progression/death were retrospectively abstracted into an electronic case report form (eCRF). Univariate statistics were used to compare demographics, clinical characteristics and treatment patterns between cohorts. Overall survival (OS) from 1L was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to compare the risk of death between the two cohorts adjusted for multiple variables. Results: eCRFs were completed for 254 patients: nab-pac = 115, pac = 139. Median follow-up was 13.1 mos in both cohorts. No differences in demographics/clinical characteristics were noted (table). Median duration of therapy was 3.9 mos (nab-pac) and 3.8 mos (pac) (p = 0.58). Objective response rate: nab-pac = 69.6%, pac = 69.8% (p = 0.96). Receipt of maintenance therapy: nab-pac = 44.4%, pac = 48.9% (p = 0.47) . Median time to progression was 6.4 mos for nab-pac (n = 32) and 3.5 mos for pac (n = 29) (p = 0.10). 13.9% of nab-pac and 7.9% of pac patients had grade 3/4 toxicities (p = 0.16). At data cut-off, 18 nab-pac (15.7%) and 30 pac (21.6%) patients were deceased. Median OS from initiation of 1L was not reached. 12-month OS: nab-pac = 87.8% (95% CI: 81.8-93.8), pac = 79.3% (95% CI: 72.5-86.2). Adjusting for sex, age, race, PD-1 expression level, charlson comorbidity index (CCI) and ECOG-PS patients treated with nab-pac had a 40% reduction in mortality risk (HR = 0.55, 95% CI: 0.30-1.01, p = 0.05). Conclusions: No significant differences in demographics and clinical characteristics between patients treated with nab-pac or pac were observed. Median duration of treatment was equivalent with a marginally longer 12-month survival rate, and a lower adjusted mortality risk, among patients treated with nab-pac. [Table: see text]


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7048-7048
Author(s):  
Aaron B. Cohen ◽  
Akshay Swaminathan ◽  
Xiaoliang Wang ◽  
Stephen Zamora ◽  
Michael A Repucci ◽  
...  

7048 Background: Castleman disease (CD) has three subtypes: Unicentric (UCD), Human herpesvirus-8 associated multicentric (HHV-8 MCD) and idiopathic multicentric (iMCD). Outcomes for patients with iMCD are poor and treatment options are limited, with only one FDA-approved therapy (siltuximab in April 2014). Further, the lack of CD-specific ICD codes until 2017 has limited real-world evaluation. We identified iMCD patients in an electronic health record (EHR)-derived dataset and described their clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and real-world overall survival (rwOS). Methods: Patients with a possible diagnosis of CD as of 8/31/20 were identified from the nationwide deidentified Flatiron Health EHR-derived database using patient-level structured data (e.g., ICD-9/10 codes) and unstructured data (e.g., clinician notes), curated via technology-enabled manual abstraction to confirm CD diagnosis and treatments received. Descriptive statistics summarized patient characteristics and treatment patterns. Patients without structured data within 90 days after diagnosis were excluded from treatment patterns analyses. 5-year rwOS rate was estimated from diagnosis date using the Kaplan-Meier estimator. Results: 747 patients with possible CD were identified, of whom 453 were confirmed to have CD by abstraction (172 UCD, 100 iMCD, 36 HHV-8 MCD, and 145 unclassified). IMCD patients were predominantly female (53%), white (58%), and treated at community sites (70%). Of the 52 iMCD patients with evidence of structured data within 90 days after diagnosis and who had at least one documented line of therapy, the most common first-line therapies were siltuximab-based therapy (42.3%), rituximab monotherapy (36.5%), and chemotherapy-based treatment (13.5%). Among 28 iMCD patients with evidence of second-line therapy, the most common treatment was rituximab monotherapy (35.7%). Among 60 iMCD patients diagnosed on or after siltuximab approval in April 2014 (including those without evidence of any treatment), 26 (43%) received siltuximab at some point. 5-year rwOS rate for the 100 iMCD patients was 75% [95% CI: 63-89%]. Conclusions: This is the first study to utilize a large EHR-derived database to describe characteristics, treatment patterns, and overall survival of iMCD patients in real-world practice. Less than half of iMCD patients diagnosed on or after the date of FDA approval for siltuximab received it at some point. Future work should focus on characterizing the drivers of poor patient outcomes.


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4991-4991
Author(s):  
Carl E. Allen ◽  
Jennifer Leiding ◽  
Shanmuganathan Chandrakasan ◽  
Kelly J. Walkovich ◽  
Abiola Oladapo ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a rare, life-threatening hyperinflammatory syndrome characterized by overactivation of the immune system due to systemic release of proinflammatory cytokines, especially of interferon gamma (IFNγ), and persistent activation of macrophages/histiocytes and T cells. Emapalumab, a fully human, anti-IFNγ monoclonal antibody that binds to both free and receptor-bound IFNy, neutralizing its biologic activity, was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2018 for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients with primary HLH with refractory, recurrent or progressive disease or intolerance with conventional HLH therapy. The safety and efficacy of emapalumab was based on results from a pivotal phase 2/3 trial which reported a 63% overall response in patients treated with emapalumab. Since approval, no study has evaluated the use of emapalumab in a larger cohort of patients in the real-world clinical setting. Aim: To assess real-world treatment patterns and outcomes, clinical and demographic characteristics among patients treated with emapalumab. Method: This retrospective, non-interventional, observational medical chart review study will include patients treated across treatment centers in the US with emapalumab in a non-clinical trial setting. The study aims to include more than 100 patients who have been treated with at least one dose of emapalumab between November 20, 2018 and December 31, 2020 (patient identification period). The date that the patient initiates treatment with emapalumab within the patient identification period is defined as the index date. The post-index date is defined as the period from the index date through to the study end date (June 30, 2021), end of data availability for the patient, or date of death, whichever occurs first. Patients will be classified into three groups (i.e. primary HLH, secondary HLH, or non-HLH) based on the information obtained from their charts, the HLH 2004 diagnostic criteria, and adjudication by the REAL-HLH Steering Committee. Results: The primary objective of the study is to describe treatment patterns in patients with HLH treated with emapalumab in a real-world clinical setting, including emapalumab dose, treatment duration, and reasons for initiating or discontinuing treatment. The secondary objectives are to describe demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with HLH treated with emapalumab, and their outcomes. The exploratory objectives include detailing the demographic, clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes of patients with non-HLH clinical conditions treated with emapalumab (Table 1). Demographics and clinical characteristics will be analyzed at the time of diagnosis. Treatment patterns and outcomes will be analyzed during the post-index date. Conclusion: The study aims to assess treatment patterns and outcomes, clinical and demographic characteristics among patients treated with emapalumab, a novel IFNγ blocking agent, in real-world clinical settings in the US. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Allen: Sobi: Consultancy. Leiding: Sobi: Consultancy. Chandrakasan: Sobi: Consultancy. Walkovich: X4 Pharmaceuticals: Other: Local PI for clinical trial involving mavorixafor and patients with neutropenia; Swedish Orphan Biovitrum AB (Sobi): Consultancy, Honoraria; Pharming: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Horizon Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Oladapo: Sobi: Current Employment. Yee: Sobi: Current Employment. Pednekar: Sobi: Consultancy; PRECISIONheor: Current Employment. Raza: Sobi: Consultancy; PRECISIONheor: Current Employment. Jordan: Sobi: Consultancy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document