Real-world outcomes of pembrolizumab plus carboplatin plus paclitaxel or nab-paclitaxel in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21717-e21717
Author(s):  
Ashley Tabah ◽  
David Huggar ◽  
Jonathan Kish ◽  
Bela Bapat ◽  
Djibril Liassou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Median Duration ◽  
Mortality Risk ◽  
Real World ◽  
Clinical Characteristics ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Treatment Patterns ◽  
Case Report Form ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Multiple Variables ◽  
Grade 3

e21717 Background: Pem+carbo+pac or nab-pac are approved first-line (1L) treatments for metastatic squamous NSCLC since 10/30/2018. Difference in real-world outcomes of these triplet combinations are unknown. Methods: Providers from community oncology practices in the USA reviewed the charts of consecutive NSCLC patients initiating 1L treatment with either pem+carbo+pac (“pac”) or pem+carbor+nab-pac (“nab-pac”) from 06/01/18-12/31/18; data were collected 11/22/2019-12/23/2019. Patient characteristics, treatment patterns, grade 3/4 toxicities, disease response, date of progression/death were retrospectively abstracted into an electronic case report form (eCRF). Univariate statistics were used to compare demographics, clinical characteristics and treatment patterns between cohorts. Overall survival (OS) from 1L was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to compare the risk of death between the two cohorts adjusted for multiple variables. Results: eCRFs were completed for 254 patients: nab-pac = 115, pac = 139. Median follow-up was 13.1 mos in both cohorts. No differences in demographics/clinical characteristics were noted (table). Median duration of therapy was 3.9 mos (nab-pac) and 3.8 mos (pac) (p = 0.58). Objective response rate: nab-pac = 69.6%, pac = 69.8% (p = 0.96). Receipt of maintenance therapy: nab-pac = 44.4%, pac = 48.9% (p = 0.47) . Median time to progression was 6.4 mos for nab-pac (n = 32) and 3.5 mos for pac (n = 29) (p = 0.10). 13.9% of nab-pac and 7.9% of pac patients had grade 3/4 toxicities (p = 0.16). At data cut-off, 18 nab-pac (15.7%) and 30 pac (21.6%) patients were deceased. Median OS from initiation of 1L was not reached. 12-month OS: nab-pac = 87.8% (95% CI: 81.8-93.8), pac = 79.3% (95% CI: 72.5-86.2). Adjusting for sex, age, race, PD-1 expression level, charlson comorbidity index (CCI) and ECOG-PS patients treated with nab-pac had a 40% reduction in mortality risk (HR = 0.55, 95% CI: 0.30-1.01, p = 0.05). Conclusions: No significant differences in demographics and clinical characteristics between patients treated with nab-pac or pac were observed. Median duration of treatment was equivalent with a marginally longer 12-month survival rate, and a lower adjusted mortality risk, among patients treated with nab-pac. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals P08.07 Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Patterns of NSCLC Stage III Patients from Real World

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. S284
Author(s):  
L. Kathmann ◽  
J. Roeper ◽  
K. Wedeken ◽  
K. Willborn ◽  
F. Griesinger
Keyword(s):  
Real World ◽  
Clinical Characteristics ◽  
Treatment Patterns ◽  
Stage Iii

Temozolomide Alone or Combined with Capecitabine for the Treatment of Metastatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasia: a “Real World” data analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto Bongiovanni ◽  
Chiara Liverani ◽  
Flavia Foca ◽  
Valentina Fausti ◽  
Giandomenico Di Menna ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Real World ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Propensity Score Analysis ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Response To Therapy ◽  
Real World Data ◽  
World Data ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Neuroendocrine Neoplasia

Background: Neuroendocrine neoplasia (NEN) are a rare group of tumors with different prognosis and response to therapy. Their heterogeneity is dependent on the site of origin, morphology and Ki67. Temozolomide (TEM) appears to be active in metastatic NENs (mNENs) but there is limited evidence about its efficacy in gastrointestinal NENs. We analyzed “real-world” data on the use of TEM alone or in association with capecitabine (CAPTEM) in patients with mNENs. Patients and Methods: One hundred consecutive patients with advanced NENs treated with TEM or CAPTEM between 2009 and 2019 were included. A pre-treatment tumor growth rate (TGR0) was calculated. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), tolerance, objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were analyzed. A propensity score analysis and inverse probability of treatment weights for Cox-regression models were used. Results: TEM-based therapy was administered to 95 patients (26.3% CAPTEM and 83.7% TEM) with a median age of 59 years (range 26-85) years. ECOG performance status was 0-2. Carcinoid syndrome was reported in 12 (12.6%) patients. Twenty (21.1%) patients with grade (G) 3 neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) and 9 (9.4%) with G3 neuroendocrine tumors (NET) were included in the analysis. Median PFS of the entire group was 10.4 months (95% confidence interval (CI):6.0-11.5). In multivariate analysis, a higher risk of progression was observed for NEC G3 patients (hazard ratio (HR) 2.70, 95%CI:1.25-5.84) and for a TGR ≥19.55 (HR:2.53, 95%CI:1.45-4.40). Median OS was 23.4 months (95%CI: 17.0-29.0) and was similar in both treatment groups (23.9 vs. 20.5 months for TEM and CAPTEM, respectively, p =0.585). In multivariate analysis, TGR ≥19.55 was associated with a higher risk of death (HR:2.18, 95%CI:1.16-4.11) than TGR<19.55, as was NEC G3 (HR: 2.42, 95%CI:1.04-5.59) with respect to NETs. No differences in terms of mPFS or mOS were seen in relation to the primary site of disease. In the 86 patients evaluable for response, ORR was 44.1% and the DCR was 70.9%. Mild adverse events (grade I-II) included anemia, neutropenia and headache. Rare cases of grade 3 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were recorded. Conclusions: TEM-based regimens are associated with a high DCR and a relatively tolerable toxicity profile in NEN of pancreatic, intestinal and lung origin. Further investigation of these specific NETs is warranted in prospective clinical trials.

Real world experience of palbociclib in hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18094-e18094 ◽  
Author(s):  
Faizan Malik ◽  
Naveed Ali ◽  
Syed Imran Mustafa Jafri ◽  
Mark L. Sundermeyer ◽  
Michael Jeffrey Seidman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Real World ◽  
Hormone Receptor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Hormone Receptor Positive ◽  
Her 2 ◽  
Grade 3

e18094 Background: Palbociclib has been approved as a first line therapy in hormone-receptor positive (HR+) and HER-2 negative metastatic breast cancer(MBC) manifesting significant improvement in progression free survival (PFS). We studied this drug in a community setting. The endpoints were estimated PFS, objective response, toxicities and patient outcomes. Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective study of HR+MBC patients receiving palbociclib after its FDA approval. 22 patients were selected Results: A total of 22 patients were included (Male = 2, Female = 20). Median age was 60-years (range, 49-84). About 90% patients had received at least one previous therapy and the median number was 1.5. 13% patients were on fulvestrant, 86% on letrozole and 4.5% on exemestane. About 64% of patients had ECOG status of ≥ 1. Median duration of palbociclib treatment was 5-months, therefore, an estimated PFS at 18-months was 50%. 4.5% patients attained complete response. 22% patients achieved partial response, 22% had stable disease and 50% patients demonstrated disease progression. 72% patients had neutropenia, of which 45% were grade ≥ 3. Thrombocytopenia and anemia were common (63% and 58%, respectively) but grade ≥ 3 thrombocytopenia or anemia was not observed. 50% patients required dose reductions and 18% required drug cessation owing to side effects. Conclusions: PFS was much lower as compared to actual trials in our real-world experience. Despite, several interesting observations were good objective response rates in males and HER-2+ patients underscoring its potential clinical efficacy in these subsets. Furthermore, apart from myelosuppressive side effects, pneumonitis was observed in one patient necessitating vigilance in clinical practice

Primary analysis of phase 2 results of cemiplimab, a human monoclonal anti-PD-1, in patients (pts) with locally advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (laCSCC).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6015-6015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Robert Migden ◽  
Nikhil I. Khushalani ◽  
Anne Lynn S. Chang ◽  
Danny Rischin ◽  
Chrysalyne D. Schmults ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Median Duration ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
Curative Surgery ◽  
Grade 3

6015 Background: Cemiplimab (REGN2810) produced substantial antitumor activity with durable responses in Phase 1 CSCC expansion cohorts and Phase 2 metastatic (m) CSCC cohort. We now present the primary analysis of the Phase 2 laCSCC cohort (NCT02760498; data cutoff date: Oct 10, 2018). Methods: Pts with laCSCC received cemiplimab 3 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks (Q2W). Tumor measurements were performed Q8W. The primary objective was to evaluate objective response rate (ORR; complete response [CR] + partial response [PR]) according to independent central review (per RECIST 1.1 for scans; modified WHO criteria for photos). Results: 78 pts were enrolled (59 M/ 19 F; median age: 74 years; ECOG PS: 0 in 38 pts, 1 in 40 pts; primary CSCC site: head/neck in 79.5%; prior systemic therapy: 15.4%; prior radiotherapy: 55.1%). Median duration of follow-up was 9.3 months (range: 0.8–27.9). ORR by central review was 43.6% (95% CI: 32.4–55.3; 10 CRs and 24 PRs); investigator-assessed (INV) ORR was 52.6% (95% CI: 40.9–64.0; 13 CRs and 28 PRs). Median duration of response (DOR) has not been reached. The longest DOR at data cut-off was 24.2 months and was still ongoing. Durable disease control rate (stable disease or response for ≥16 weeks) was 62.8% (95% CI: 51.1–73.5). Median observed time to response was 1.9 months (range: 1.8–8.8). Median progression-free and overall survival have not been reached. Tumor PD-L1 status is available for 48/78 pts, tumor mutational burden analysis (from targeted exome panel) is ongoing for ≥40/78 pts; response correlation analyses are planned. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs; all grades, Grade ≥3) were fatigue (42.3%, 1.3%), diarrhea and pruritus (both 26.9%, 0%), and nausea (21.8%, 0%). INV grade ≥3 immune-related AEs occurred in 10.3% of pts. One pt died due to an unknown cause that was assessed as treatment-related. Conclusions: Cemiplimab 3 mg/kg Q2W showed substantial antitumor activity, durable responses, and acceptable safety profile in pts with laCSCC. These data strongly support the recent FDA approval of cemiplimab-rwlc for pts with mCSCC or laCSCC who are not candidates for curative surgery or curative radiation. Clinical trial information: NCT02760498.

EAGLE: A phase 3, randomized, open-label study of durvalumab (D) with or without tremelimumab (T) in patients (pts) with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6012-6012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa F. Licitra ◽  
Robert I. Haddad ◽  
Caroline Even ◽  
Makoto Tahara ◽  
Mikhail Dvorkin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Group Performance ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Grade 3

6012 Background: EAGLE is a phase 3 study evaluating efficacy of D (anti-PD-L1 mAb) monotherapy and D+T (anti-CTLA-4 mAb) vs standard of care (SOC) in pts with R/M HNSCC who progressed following platinum-based therapy (NCT02369874). Methods: Pts were randomized 1:1:1 to D 10 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks (Q2W), D+T (D 20 mg/kg IV Q4W + T 1 mg/kg IV Q4W for 4 doses, then D 10 mg/kg IV Q2W), or SOC (investigator’s choice: cetuximab, taxane, methotrexate, or fluoropyrimidine-based regimen). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) with dual primary objectives of D+T vs SOC and D vs SOC. Additional endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DoR), and adverse events (AEs). Results: 240 pts were randomized to D, 247 to D+T and 249 to SOC. An imbalance for Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) was seen in favor of the SOC arm (D, PS 0 = 26%, PS 1 = 74%; D+T, PS 0 = 26%, PS 1 = 74%; SOC, PS 0 = 32%, PS 1 = 68%). The risk of death was not statistically significantly different for D compared with SOC (HR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.72–1.08; P = 0.20) or D+T vs SOC (HR: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.85–1.26; P = 0.76). Efficacy data are provided in the table. Treatment-related AEs Grade ≥3 were reported in 10.1% of pts (regardless of causality Grade ≥3 AEs were 41.4%) in the D arm, 16.3% (51.2%) for D+T, and 24.2% (44.2%) for SOC. Following treatment, 2% of pts in D, 5% in D+T and 15% in SOC received immunotherapy. Conclusions: D and D+T did not demonstrate a statistically significant improvement in OS compared to standard chemotherapy in pts with R/M HNSCC. Median OS and ORR of D arm were similar to other studies with checkpoint inhibitors. The SOC arm outperformed what has been seen for SOC arms in previous studies; subsequent immunotherapy may have confounded the OS analyses. The safety profile for D and D + T in R/M HNSCC is consistent with previous trials. Clinical trial information: NCT02369874. [Table: see text]

Phase 2 study of cemiplimab, a human monoclonal anti-PD-1, in patients (pts) with metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (mCSCC; Group 1): 12-month follow-up.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9526-9526 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander David Guminski ◽  
Annette May Ling Lim ◽  
Nikhil I. Khushalani ◽  
Chrysalyne D. Schmults ◽  
Leonel Fernando Hernandez-Aya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Median Duration ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
Phase 2 Study ◽  
Grade 3

9526 Background: Primary analysis (Oct 2017) of cemiplimab (REGN2810) in pts with mCSCC in a Phase 2 study demonstrated substantial antitumor activity, durable responses, and acceptable safety profile. We now report 12-month follow-up data from these pts (NCT02760498; data cutoff date: Sep 20, 2018). Methods: Pts with mCSCC received cemiplimab 3 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks (Q2W). Tumor measurements were performed Q8W. The primary objective was to evaluate objective response rate (ORR; complete response [CR] + partial response [PR]) according to independent central review (per RECIST 1.1 for scans; modified WHO criteria for photos). Results: 59 pts (median age: 71 years) were enrolled. Median duration of follow-up was 16.5 months (range: 1.1–26.6). ORR by central review was 49.2% (95% CI: 35.9–62.5; 10 CRs and 19 PRs [4 CRs and 25 PRs by investigator-assessment (INV)]). Median duration of response (DOR) has not been reached. The longest DOR at data cut-off was 21.6 months and was still ongoing. Observed DOR exceeded 12 months in 22/29 pts (75.9%) with response. Durable disease control rate (stable disease or response for ≥16 weeks) was 62.7% (95% CI: 49.1–75.0). Median observed time to response was 1.9 months (range: 1.7–9.1). Median progression-free survival was 18.4 months (95% CI: 7.3–not evaluable); median overall survival has not been reached. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (all grades, Grade ≥3) were diarrhea (28.8%, 1.7%), fatigue (25.4%, 1.7%), and nausea (23.7%, 0%). By INV, grade ≥3 immune-related adverse events occurred in 13.6% of pts. Conclusions: This analysis demonstrates substantial antitumor activity and increasing DOR with cemiplimab 3 mg/kg Q2W in pts with mCSCC. There were no new safety signals. These data strongly support the recent FDA approval of cemiplimab-rwlc for pts with mCSCC or locally advanced CSCC who are not candidates for curative surgery or curative radiation. Clinical trial information: NCT02760498.

Safety and efficacy of nivolumab in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): Final analysis from the NIVOREN GETUG AFU 26 study.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 542-542 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurence Albiges ◽  
Sylvie Negrier ◽  
Cécile Dalban ◽  
Christine Chevreau ◽  
Gwenaelle Gravis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prospective Study ◽  
Real World ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Real World Setting ◽  
Grade 3

542 Background: NIVOREN GETUG AFU 26 study, is a French multicenter prospective study to evaluate safety and efficacy of Nivolumab (N) in a broad “real world setting” in mRCC after failure of 1 or 2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Methods: Between February 2016 and June 2017, 729 pts have been enrolled across 27 institutions. Primary objective of the trial was safety assessed by grade ≥ 3 treatment related adverse event (TRAE). Results: Overall, 720 patients treated with N were included in this final analysis. All pts had clear cell mRCC. Median age was 64 years old, 77.4% were male, 84.7% had prior nephrectomy. ECOG PS was >1 in 15.0%, 21.3% pts had received prior everolimus, 22.4% pts had received more than 2 previous lines, IMDC risk groups were 18.3%/56.2%/25.5% for good/intermediate and poor risk respectively. Brain Metastasis at screening was noted in 83 (12.3%) pts. With a median follow up of 20.9 months (mo), median duration of treatment was 5.2 mo (0.5; 28.1) with 15% of pts still on therapy. Median PFS was 3.2 IC 95% [2.9; 4.6] mo. At the time of this analysis, 316 pts have died and 12 mo OS rate was 69% IC 95% [66; 73]. Objective response rate was 20.8% (1.2% CR, 19.6%PR). Stable disease was seen in 31.6% and PD in 47.6%. Noteworthy, 46.1% of pts were treated beyond progression. Overall, 123 pts (17.1%) have presented at least one grade ≥ 3 TRAE, including asthenia (2.4%), metabolic disorders (2.1%), gastro-intestinal disorders (1 .9%), musculoskeletal (1.7%), renal disorders (1.3%), hematologic (1.3%). 6 patients have developed grade 5 toxicity (2 cardiac failure, 1 macrophage activation syndrom, 1 Cerebral hemorrhage, 1 unknown). Treatment discontinuation due to any grade TRAE occurred in 54 pts (7.5%). Interestingly, pts with grade ≥ 3 TRAE had longer PFS than pts without grade ≥ 3 TRAE (HR 0.69 [0.55-0.87]). Conclusions: We report the primary objective analysis of the largest prospective real world setting study of N in mRCC. NIVOREN study demonstrates that N safety and efficacy in a “real world” prospective study are similar to the pivotal study. Grade ≥ 3 TRAE was associated with longer PFS. Clinical trial information: NCT03013335.

Efficacy and safety of lazertinib 240 mg as the clinical dose in patients with EGFR T790M mutant NSCLC: Data from a phase I/II study.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9572-9572
Author(s):  
Ki Hyeong Lee ◽  
Myung-Ju Ahn ◽  
Ji-Youn Han ◽  
Sang-We Kim ◽  
Eun Kyung Cho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Median Duration ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Egfr Mutations ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Open Label ◽  
T790m Mutation ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Egfr T790m

9572 Background: Lazertinib (YH25448) is a highly mutant-selective, irreversible 3rd-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that targets the activating EGFR mutations (Del19 and L858R), as well as the T790M mutation, while sparing wild type. We report the efficacy and safety results of lazertinib 240 mg as recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) from a phase I/II study of lazertinib (NCT03046992). Methods: Patients (pts) with advanced NSCLC, who had progressed after prior EGFR-TKI therapy were enrolled in an open-label, multicenter, phase I/II study with dose-escalation (20-320 mg), dose-expansion (40-240 mg) and dose-extension phases. Pts were assessed for safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and efficacy. For dose-expansion and extension phases, tumors had to be T790M mutation-positive (T790M+). Of all 78 pts assigned to lazertinib 240 mg dose level across all phases, 76 pts with centrally confirmed T790M+ were included for efficacy analysis. Results: As of 30 Sep 2019, a total of 78 pts (49% female, median age 62) received at least one dose of lazertinib 240 mg. The median duration of follow-up was 9.6 months and 44 pts were ongoing at data cut-off. Of 78 pts, 76 pts with centrally confirmed T790M+ showed the objective response rate (ORR) 57.9% (95% CI 46.8, 69.0), the disease control rate (DCR) 89.5% (95% CI 82.6, 96.4), the median progression-free survival (PFS) 11.0 months (95% CI 5.6, 16.4) and the median duration of response (DoR) 13.8 months (95% CI 9.6, NR) by independent central review (ICR), respectively. Two pts (3%) experienced a confirmed complete response. The investigator-assessed ORR, DCR, median PFS and median DoR were 72.4% (95% CI 62.3, 82.4), 94.7% (95% CI 89.7, 99.8), 13.2 months (95% CI 9.6, not reached) and 11.8 months (95% CI 8.4, not reached), respectively. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) at the 240 mg dose regardless of its causality were rash (35%), pruritus (33%) and paraesthesia (32%), which were mostly mild (Grade ≥3 rash: 1%; no Grade ≥3 pruritus or paraesthesia). TEAEs leading to dose reduction and dose discontinuation were observed in 13% (10/78) and 8% (4/78), respectively. Drug related TEAEs of grade ≥3 were observed in 6% (5/78). Conclusions: Lazertinib 240 mg has a favorable safety profile, and exhibits promising anti-tumor activity in pts with EGFR T790M+ NSCLC. Clinical trial information: NCT03046992 .

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document