scholarly journals Adjuvant Vaginal Use of Sildenafil Citrate in a Hormone Replacement Cycle Improved Live Birth Rates Among 10,069 Women During First Frozen Embryo Transfers

2020 ◽  
Vol Volume 14 ◽  
pp. 5289-5297
Author(s):  
Yu Tao ◽  
Ningling Wang
2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
V Montalvo ◽  
J Masso ◽  
A Garcia-Faura ◽  
B Marques ◽  
M Lopez-Teijon

Abstract Study question Does Assisted hatching (AH) improve success rates when applied to frozen embryo transfers? Summary answer AH does not improve implantation, ongoing pregnancy or live birth rates when applied to thawed embryos. What is known already Vitrification has been proven to be the most efficient technique to preserve human embryos. However, vitrification has some consequences for the embryos, zona pellucida (ZP) hardening being one of them. Multiple studies suggest the need to apply laser Assisted hatching or ZP thinning to thawed embryos in order to improve success rates. Still, there is not enough evidence to ensure the utility of AH, and considering the great variation in design between studies more evidence is needed. Study design, size, duration Study performed from October 2019 and January 2020. Disregarding embryos with natural Hatching and PGT-A. Embryos that, immediately after thawing, were completely expanded (trophectoderm in contact with ZP) were also excluded from the study. We applied a randomization to choose in which embryos we had to perform AH. Neither the gynecologist nor the embryologist performing the embryo transfer knew whether the embryo had AH performed or not. Participants/materials, setting, methods 353 frozen embryo transfers of one blastocist were considered for the study, 71 excluded for expansion after thawing, 65 excluded because of PGT-A, 103 in which we performed AH (AH+) and 114 without AH (AH-). In the AH+ group we performed laser-AH of 1/3 of the ZP, avoiding to damage the trophectoderm and performing the laser shots as far away to the ICM as possible. We used Chi-square testing to assess the effects of AH. Main results and the role of chance We assessed all relevant clinical data parameters. No statistical differences were found in egg age, maternal age, embryo quality, nor endometrial thickness between groups. Implantation and miscarriage rates were equivalent between AH+ group (40.9%; 20.5%) and AH- group (47.4%; 18.5%). The main outcome of this study was live birth rates. No statistical differences were found between groups (AH-= 38.6%; AH + = 30.1%; p = 03221) proving that making it easier to get out of the ZP does not affect success rates. Analyzing the data from the excluded embryos we found no improvement on live birth rates when embryos were expanded just after thawing (38.0%; p = 0.457). As expected, PGT-A embryos yielded higher live birth rates (52.3%; p < 0,05) Limitations, reasons for caution Preliminary study with a small data set. Wider implications of the findings: This study suggest that thawed embryos have the capacity to get out of the ZP regardless if AH was performed or not. Having no positive effects, AH seems to be unnecessary in this scenario. Trial registration number Not applicable


BMC Medicine ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew D. A. C. Smith ◽  
Kate Tilling ◽  
Deborah A. Lawlor ◽  
Scott M. Nelson

Abstract Background It is not known whether segmentation of an in vitro fertilisation (IVF) cycle, with freezing of all embryos prior to transfer, increases the chance of a live birth after all embryos are transferred. Methods In a prospective study of UK Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority data, we investigated the impact of segmentation, compared with initial fresh embryo followed by frozen embryo transfers, on live birth rate and perinatal outcomes. We used generalised linear models to assess the effect of segmentation in the whole cohort, with additional analyses within women who had experienced both segmentation and non-segmentation. We compared rates of live birth, low birthweight (LBW < 2.5 kg), preterm birth (< 37 weeks), macrosomia (> 4 kg), small for gestational age (SGA < 10th centile), and large for gestational age (LGA > 90th centile) for a given ovarian stimulation cycle accounting for all embryo transfers. Results We assessed 202,968 women undergoing 337,148 ovarian stimulation cycles and 399,896 embryo transfer procedures. Live birth rates were similar in unadjusted analyses for segmented and non-segmented cycles (rate ratio 1.05, 95% CI 1.02–1.08) but lower in segmented cycles when adjusted for age, cycle number, cause of infertility, and ovarian response (rate ratio 0.80, 95% CI 0.78–0.83). Segmented cycles were associated with increased risk of macrosomia (adjusted risk ratio 1.72, 95% CI 1.55–1.92) and LGA (1.51, 1.38–1.66) but lower risk of LBW (0.71, 0.65–0.78) and SGA (0.64, 0.56–0.72). With adjustment for blastocyst/cleavage-stage embryo transfer in those with data on this (329,621 cycles), results were not notably changed. Similar results were observed comparing segmented to non-segmented within 3261 women who had both and when analyses were repeated excluding multiple embryo cycles and multiple pregnancies. When analyses were restricted to women with a single embryo transfer, the transfer of a frozen-thawed embryo in a segmented cycles was no longer associated with a lower risk of LBW (0.97, 0.71–1.33) or SGA (0.84, 0.61–1.15), but the risk of macrosomia (1.74, 1.39–2.20) and LGA (1.49, 1.20–1.86) persisted. When the analyses for perinatal outcomes were further restricted to solely frozen embryo transfers, there was no strong statistical evidence for associations. Conclusions Widespread application of segmentation and freezing of all embryos to unselected patient populations may be associated with lower cumulative live birth rates and should be restricted to those with a clinical indication.


Author(s):  
Lauren A. Bishop ◽  
Justin Gunn ◽  
Samad Jahandideh ◽  
Kate Devine ◽  
Alan H. Decherney ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 1-2
Author(s):  
Trenton L Place ◽  
Rachel A Mejia ◽  
Amy E.T. Sparks ◽  
Karen M. Summers ◽  
E. Hakan Duran ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
Delphine Haouzi ◽  
Frida Entezami ◽  
Antoine Torre ◽  
Charlène Innocenti ◽  
Yannick Antoine ◽  
...  

AbstractThe aim of this prospective study was to evaluate outcome benefits expected in repeated implantation failure (RIF) patients (n = 217) after customized embryo transfer based upon identification of the receptivity window by transcriptomic approach using the Win-Test. In this test, the expression of 11 endometrial genes known to be predictive of endometrial receptivity is assessed by RT-PCR in biopsies collected during the implantation window (6–9 days after the spontaneous luteinizing hormone surge during natural cycles, 5–9 days after progesterone administration during hormone replacement therapy cycles). Then, patients underwent either customized embryo transfer (cET, n = 157 patients) according to the Win-Test results or embryo transfer according to the classical procedure (control group, n = 60). Pregnancy and live birth rates were compared in the two groups. The Win-Test showed that in 78.5% of women, the receptivity window lasted less than 48 h, although it could be shorter (< 24 h, 9.5%) or longer (> 48 h, 12%). This highlighted that only in 20% of patients with RIF the endometrium would have been receptive if the classical embryo transfer protocol was followed. In the other 80% of patients, the receptivity window was delayed by 1–3 days relative to the classical timing. This suggests that implantation failure could be linked to inadequate timing of embryo transfer. In agreement, both implantation (22.7% vs. 7.2%) and live birth rates per patient (31.8% vs. 8.3%) were significantly higher in the cET group than in the control group. cET on the basis of the Win-Test results could be proposed to improve pregnancy and live birth rates.ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04192396; December 5, 2019, retrospectively registered.


2019 ◽  
Vol 71 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Panagiotis Drakopoulos ◽  
Joaquín Errázuriz ◽  
Samuel Santos-Ribeiro ◽  
Herman Tournaye ◽  
Alberto Vaiarelli ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document