scholarly journals Effects of a New Mattress and Pillow and Standard Treatment for Nightly Pelvic Girdle Pain in Pregnant Women: A Randomised Controlled Study

2021 ◽  
Vol Volume 13 ◽  
pp. 1251-1260
Author(s):  
Caroline Feldthusen ◽  
Monika Fagevik Olsen ◽  
Hasse Ejnell ◽  
Helen Elden
Keyword(s):  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Standard Treatment ◽  
Pelvic Girdle ◽  
Pelvic Girdle Pain ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Randomised Controlled Study ◽  
Randomised Controlled

Acupuncture for Insomnia in Pregnancy – a Prospective, Quasi-Randomised, Controlled Study

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 47-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
João Bosco Guerreiro da Silva ◽  
Mary Uchiyama Nakamura ◽  
José Antonio Cordeiro ◽  
Luiz Kulay
Keyword(s):  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Numerical Rating Scale ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Randomised Controlled Study ◽  
Numerical Rating ◽  
Randomised Controlled

Objective This study was undertaken to test the effects of acupuncture on insomnia in a group of pregnant women under real life conditions, and to compare the results with a group of patients undergoing conventional treatment alone (sleep hygiene). Methods A total of 30 conventionally treated pregnant women were allocated at random into groups with or without acupuncture. Seventeen patients formed the study group and 13 the control group. The pregnant women scored the severity of insomnia using a Numerical Rating Scale from 0 to 10. Women were followed up for eight weeks and interviewed five times, at two-week intervals. Results Eight women dropped out, five in the study group and three in the control group. The study group reported a larger reduction on insomnia rating (5.1) than the control group (0.0), a difference which was statistically significant (P=0.0028). Average insomnia scores decreased by at least 50% over time in nine (75%) patients in the study group and in three (30%) of the control group. Conclusion The results of this study suggest that acupuncture alleviates insomnia during pregnancy and further research is justified.

scholarly journals Effects of acupuncture and stabilising exercises as adjunct to standard treatment in pregnant women with pelvic girdle pain: randomised single blind controlled trial

BMJ ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 330 (7494) ◽  
pp. 761 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen Elden ◽  
Lars Ladfors ◽  
Monika Fagevik Olsen ◽  
Hans-Christian Ostgaard ◽  
Henrik Hagberg
Keyword(s):  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Standard Treatment ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Pelvic Girdle ◽  
Pelvic Girdle Pain ◽  
Single Blind

Improved pregnant women’s understanding of research information by an enhanced informed consent form: a randomised controlled study nested in neonatal research

2017 ◽  
Vol 103 (5) ◽  
pp. F403-F407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nut Koonrungsesomboon ◽  
Chanchai Traivaree ◽  
Sangkae Chamnanvanakij ◽  
Pimchitr Rungtragoolchai ◽  
Yawana Thanapat ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Informed Consent ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Consent Form ◽  
School Level ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Ethical Review ◽  
Informed Consent Form ◽  
Randomised Controlled Study ◽  
Randomised Controlled

ObjectiveThis study aimed to test the applicability and effectiveness of the enhanced informed consent form (ICF) methodology, proposed by the Strategic Initiative for Developing Capacity in Ethical Review (SIDCER), in neonatal research requiring maternal consent.DesignA single-centre open-label randomised controlled study.SettingAntenatal care clinics at Phramongkutklao Hospital, Thailand.Patients234 pregnant women who were at risk of preterm labour were enrolled; 232 individuals completed the study.InterventionsThe participants were randomly assigned to read either the SIDCER ICF or the conventional ICF.Main outcome measuresThe participants’ understanding of essential trial-related information was assessed using 25 closed-ended questions. The primary endpoint was the proportion of the participants who obtained the satisfactory level of understanding at 80% (score of ≥20/25).Results72.5% (87/120) of the participants in the SIDCER ICF group and 59.8% (67/112) of the conventional ICF group achieved the primary endpoint (relative risk (RR)=1.212, 95% CI 1.005 to 1.462, p=0.041). The superiority of the SIDCER ICF over the conventional ICF was significant, particularly among the participants whose education was at the high school level or below (63.5% vs 44.1%, RR=1.441, 95% CI 1.022 to 2.030, p=0.031).ConclusionsThe SIDCER ICF methodology is applicable to neonatal research requiring maternal consent. The SIDCER ICF significantly improved the understanding of pregnant women, particularly among those with lower levels of education. The present study confirms the value of the SIDCER ICF methodology in research involving individuals with a limited academic background.

scholarly journals The effectiveness of craniosacral therapy compared to standard treatment for pelvic girdle pain during pregnancy: A quasi experimental study

Biomedicine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 830-836
Author(s):  
K Kotteeswaran ◽  
V Meena ◽  
B Sathish Kumar ◽  
R Tamil Selvi ◽  
S.K Pavithira
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Study ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Standard Treatment ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Post Treatment ◽  
Pelvic Girdle ◽  
Pelvic Girdle Pain ◽  
Craniosacral Therapy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Quasi Experimental

Introduction and Aim: Pelvic girdle pain is one of major pregnancy discomforts affecting about 50% of pregnant women. There is no evidence that standard treatment is completely effective for pelvic girdle pain in pregnant women. Hence there is a requirement for newer safer therapies such as craniosacral therapy. The aim of this study is to evaluate effectiveness of craniosacral therapy in reducing pain and improving daily life activities which is restricted in pregnant women with pelvic girdle pain.   Materials and Methods: In this quasi-experimental study, we recruited 30 pregnant women who were clinically diagnosed with pelvic girdle pain using convenient sampling technique. They were divided into control and craniosacral therapy treated group. Using NPRS and PGQ, their pain intensity and disability values were recorded and compared pre and post treatment using mean and standard deviation. The paired ‘t’ test was used for statistical analysis.   Results: Group A post treatment NPRS value range was mean = 3.00, SD = 0.85 and PGQ post treatment was mean = 36.87, SD = 4.91. Group B post treatment NPRS value mean = 1.87, SD = 0.83 and PGQ post treatment value was mean = 26.53, SD = 4.42. Since between group significant difference was p<0.0001 it was statistically significant.   Conclusion: Craniosacral therapy was found to be effective than standard treatment for pelvic girdle pain during pregnancy

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document