scholarly journals Association Between the A118G Polymorphism of the OPRM1 Gene and Suicidal Depression in a Large Cohort of Outpatients with Depression

2021 ◽  
Vol Volume 17 ◽  
pp. 3109-3118
Author(s):  
Benedicte Nobile ◽  
Emilie Olie ◽  
Nicolas Ramoz ◽  
Jonathan Dubois ◽  
Sebastien Guillaume ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
pp. 026988112199199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miriam Sebold ◽  
Maria Garbusow ◽  
Deniz Cerci ◽  
Ke Chen ◽  
Christian Sommer ◽  
...  

Background: Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer (PIT) quantifies the extent to which a stimulus that has been associated with reward or punishment alters operant behaviour. In alcohol dependence (AD), the PIT effect serves as a paradigmatic model of cue-induced relapse. Preclinical studies have suggested a critical role of the opioid system in modulating Pavlovian–instrumental interactions. The A118G polymorphism of the OPRM1 gene affects opioid receptor availability and function. Furthermore, this polymorphism interacts with cue-induced approach behaviour and is a potential biomarker for pharmacological treatment response in AD. In this study, we tested whether the OPRM1 polymorphism is associated with the PIT effect and relapse in AD. Methods: Using a PIT task, we examined three independent samples: young healthy subjects ( N = 161), detoxified alcohol-dependent patients ( N = 186) and age-matched healthy controls ( N = 105). We used data from a larger study designed to assess the role of learning mechanisms in the development and maintenance of AD. Subjects were genotyped for the A118G (rs1799971) polymorphism of the OPRM1 gene. Relapse was assessed after three months. Results: In all three samples, participants with the minor OPRM1 G-Allele (G+ carriers) showed increased expression of the PIT effect in the absence of learning differences. Relapse was not associated with the OPRM1 polymorphism. Instead, G+ carriers displaying increased PIT effects were particularly prone to relapse. Conclusion: These results support a role for the opioid system in incentive salience motivation. Furthermore, they inform a mechanistic model of aberrant salience processing and are in line with the pharmacological potential of opioid receptor targets in the treatment of AD.


2013 ◽  
Vol 118 (6) ◽  
pp. 1395-1407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xavier Borrat ◽  
Iñaki F. Trocóniz ◽  
José F. Valencia ◽  
Silvia Rivadulla ◽  
Oriol Sendino ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: The presence of the A118G single nucleotide polymorphism in the OPRM1 gene as well as noxious stimulation might affect the requirements of remifentanil for patients undergoing ultrasonographic endoscopy under sedation-analgesia with propofol and remifentanil. Bispectral index (BIS) was used as a surrogate measure of effect. Methods: A total of 207 patients were screened for A118G and randomly received different combinations of propofol and remifentanil, changed depending on the nausea response to endoscopy tube introduction. Nonlinear mixed effects modelling was used to establish the relation between propofol and remifentanil with respect to BIS and to investigate the influence of A118G or noxious stimulation. The value of ke0 for propofol and remifentanil was estimated to avoid the hysteresis between predicted effect site concentration (Ce) and BIS. Results: Data from 176 patients were analysed. Eleven were recessive homozygous for A118G (OPRM = 1). A total of 165 patients were either dominant homozygous or heterozygous and considered normal (OPRM = 0). The estimated values of ke0 for propofol and remifentanil were 0.122 and 0.148min−1. Propofol and remifentanil were synergistic with respect to the BIS (α = 1.85). EC50 estimate for propofol was 3.86 µg/ml and for remifentanil 19.6 ng/ml in normal patients and 326ng/ml in OPRM = 1 patients. BIS increases around 4% for the same effect site concentrations with noxious stimulation. Conclusions: Predicted effect site concentration of remifentanil ranging 1–5ng/ml synergistically potentiates the effects of propofol on the BIS but has no effect in A118G patients. Noxious stimulation increases BIS values by 4% at the same concentrations of propofol and remifentanil.


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (18) ◽  
pp. 478-478 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xin-Ru Cheng ◽  
Pei-Ge Xia ◽  
Zan-Yang Shi ◽  
Qian-Ya Xu ◽  
Cheng-Han Luo ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 219-222 ◽  
Author(s):  
Omar Šerý ◽  
Radovan Přikryl ◽  
Lukáš Častulík ◽  
František Šťastný

2012 ◽  
Vol 37 (03) ◽  
Author(s):  
N Steinemann ◽  
IU Leonhäuser ◽  
N Probst-Hensch ◽  
L Grize ◽  
C Brombach

2018 ◽  
Vol 56 (01) ◽  
pp. E2-E89
Author(s):  
B Goeppert ◽  
S Roessler ◽  
M Renner ◽  
S Singer ◽  
A Mehrabi ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Banys-Paluchowski ◽  
K Milde-Langosch ◽  
T Fehm ◽  
I Witzel ◽  
L Oliveira-Ferrer ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document