scholarly journals A national, multicenter, non-interventional, observational study on treatment patterns in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma in Turkey – NOTES study

2018 ◽  
Vol Volume 11 ◽  
pp. 1223-1228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Şuayib Yalçın ◽  
Ramazan Yildiz ◽  
Faysal Dane ◽  
Aziz Karaoğlu ◽  
Berna Öksüzoğlu ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4520-4520 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian I. Rini ◽  
Tanya B. Dorff ◽  
Paul Elson ◽  
Cristina Suarez ◽  
Jordi Humbert ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 505-505 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sumanta Kumar Pal ◽  
Magdaliz Gorritz ◽  
Steven A. Sherman ◽  
Zhimei Liu

505 Background: The treatment landscape for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has changed in recent years, with several targeted therapies becoming available for 1st and 2nd line use. The rapidly evolving treatment landscape has left physicians with an abundance of choices for the treatment of mRCC patients. This study aimed to understand whether this has resulted in varying treatment patterns across US regions in 1st and 2nd line targeted therapy for mRCC. Methods: RCC patients who initiated 1st line targeted therapy with a vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)/VEGF receptor (VEGFr) or mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor between January 1, 2004 and June 30, 2011 were identified in the MarketScan database. First-line therapy was defined as the first claim in the database for a targeted therapy. One drug claim was sufficient to establish a line of therapy and a new line was defined as switching to another agent. Treatment patterns in the 1st and 2nd line settings were assessed in patients who initiated 2ndtherapy line after FDA approval of everolimus (Ev) (March 30, 2009) and stratified by geographic region. Results: Of the 6,524 patients included in the study, 1,298 (36%) received a 2nd line targeted therapy after March 30, 2009. Although all possible permutations of treatment sequences were observed, overall, sunitinib (Su) and temsirolimus (Te) combined made up 80% to 83% of the 1st line regimens across regions. The most common sequence was Su->Ev, observed in 18% of patients in the North Central US to 31% in the Northeast; Su->Te was the next most common sequence in all regions. Among patients who received 1st line temsirolimus, the majority initiated 2ndline on either bevacizumab (Be) (7%-12%) or Su (6%-10%) across regions. Conclusions: The most common treatment sequences across all regions were Su->Ev and Su->Te. Although a consistent pattern of sequential therapy emerged across regions, a wide range of on- and off-label strategies was observed outside of the predominant pattern of care. Furthermore, very few patients in this study received additional targeted therapy after 1st line. Further research is needed to identify factors influencing these treatment strategies.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 416-416
Author(s):  
Gregory P. Hess ◽  
Rohit Borker ◽  
Eileen Fonseca

416 Background: Limited information about real-world treatment patterns of targeted agents for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) is available to inform their use in clinical practice. Methods: This retrospective, observational study employed US claims data (January 2007-November 2010) to identify treatment patterns, including treatment duration and dosing, for targeted agents (sunitinib, sorafenib, pazopanib, bevacizumab, and temsirolimus) indicated in 1st line management of advanced/mRCC. The study included adult mRCC patients who were observed for ≥3 months after initiation of their 1st line therapy with a targeted agent. Descriptive analyses were conducted for the observed treatment patterns. Results: A total of 273 patients on 1st line therapy were identified and included in the study sample out of which 235 patients were treated with sunitinib, 16 patients with sorafenib, and 15 patients with temsirolimus. Pazopanib and bevacizumab were excluded from further analysis due to their small samples; n<10. The median observed treatment durations were: sunitinib 3.3 months, sorafenib 4.0 months, and temsirolimus 2.6 months. Patients initiating therapy on sorafenib (n=16) and temsirolimus (n=15) in the study sample were insufficient for meaningful dosing analyses. In sum, of the n=235 sunitinib patients, 178 (approximately 76%) initiated therapy at the indicated dose of 50 mg. Sixty-five percent of these patients were not observed filling a 4th script (the average number observed), while 26% maintained their starting dose and 9% experienced a dose reduction at their fourth fill. (See table). Conclusions: This study suggests that opportunities exist to improve treatment duration in real-world clinical practice and to better understand possible influences, other than disease progression, on treatment and dose changes. [Table: see text]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document