Angelica Noguelra Rodrigues
◽
Luiz Claudio Santos Thuler
◽
Anke Bergmann
◽
Suzana Sales de Aguiar
◽
Carlos Gil Moreira Ferreira
1587 Background: Most cancers of the uterine cervix are SCC, but the relative and absolute incidence of ACA has risen in recent years, particularly in younger patients, and ACA now accounts for about 20% of invasive cervical cancers in screened populations worldwide. However, the developing world, with sub-optimally screened women, accounts for more than 80% of incident cervical cancers. Our objective was to compare epidemiological, clinical characteristics, and treatment outcome of ACA with those of SCC of the cervix, with respect to ethnic group, age and stage at diagnosis, and pattern of response to first treatment in a sub-optimally screened population. Methods: Data of cervical cancer patients with SCC and ACA (adenosquamous + adenocarcinoma) treated from 2000 through 2009 were obtained from the Brazilian Hospital Cancer Register databases. Summary odds ratios and chi-square tests were estimated. Results: A total of 60,883 patients were analyzed: 54,425 (89.4%) cases of SCC, and 6,458 (10.6%) of ACA. Compared to ACA, the SCC cohort were younger (49.37 x 51.83 years, p<0.001), more frequently black (58.1% x 49.2%, p<0.001), presented higher degree of illiteracy (22.7 x 16.1%, p<0.001), and alcohol (13 x 9.8%, p<0.001) and tobacco dependence (41.5 x 31%, p<0.001). Tumor stage at the time of diagnosis was also significantly different (p<0.01). Considering prognostic factors, in both subtypes, more than 60% of the patients were stage II or inferior and ACA was associated with a significantly increased risk of inadequate response after the first course of treatment (crude OR=1.14 CI95%=1.07-1.21; adjusted OR=0.94 CI95%=0.87-1.01) and of death (crude OR=1.26 CI95%=1.15-1.38; adjusted OR=1.1 CI95%=1.00-1.23). Conclusions: Differences between ACA and SCC were found in age at diagnosis, extent of disease and ethnic distribution. In spite of these differences, the inadequate response to treatment seems to be mainly the result of more advanced stage, rather than cell type. Screening strategies with higher sensitivity are necessary, and irrespectively of histological subtype, quality of treatment must be improved in developing countries.