scholarly journals Comparative pharmacoeconomic analysis of the use of erythropoiesis-stimulating drugs for the treatment of anemia in cancer patients

2021 ◽  
pp. 174-182
Author(s):  
I. S. Krysanov ◽  
E. V. Makarova ◽  
V. Yu. Ermakova
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Clinical Efficacy ◽  
Pharmacoeconomic Analysis ◽  
Care Organization ◽  
Epoetin Alfa ◽  
Patients Rights ◽  
Epoetin Beta ◽  
Level Increase ◽  
The Cost

Introduction. Currently, a number of pharmacoeconomic studies describing use of erythropoietin stimulating agent (ESA) in cancer patients with anemia have been published, however, most of the publications on this topic are foreign. At the same time, there are practically no studies comparing the economic efficiency of various ESA preparations with each other. Some of works by foreign colleagues reflect that the clinical efficacy of using ESA namely the degree of increase in Hb, significantly depends on the patient’s body weight: the higher the weight, the greater the dose of EPO is required for a single administration and a course of therapy.Aim. Сomparative pharmacoeconomic analysis of epoetin alfa usage for the treatment of anemia in adult cancer patients with weight 80 kg.Materials and methods. The following drugs were selected for comparative analysis: epoetin alfa, epoetin beta, darbepoetin. Clinical efficacy was assessed in terms of the rate of in Hb level increase. Pharmacoeconomic analysis was carried out using the cost-effectiveness method (CEA).Results. Тhe usage of epoetin alfa 12,000 IU for 8 weeks therapy course in cancer patients weighting over 80 kg had a better cost-effectiveness ratio compared to epoetin alfa (10,000 IU, 30,000 IU, 40,000 IU) and darbepoetin, giving way in price only to the cheapest epoetin beta which can be administered 4 injections simultaneously. Its the infringement of patients rights to avoid additional pain. Its the infringement of patients rights to avoid additional pain. At the 16th week of therapy, the usage of epoetin alfa 12,000 IU had an advantage over all ESA.Conclusions. Тhe usage of russian epoetin alfa 12,000 IU for the treatment of anemia in adult cancer patients weighing over 80 kg approximately in real clinical practice in Russian Federation is an economically justified approach to the medical care organization. 

A Pharmacoeconomic Analysis of Phosphate Binders Cost-Effectiveness in the RISCAVID Study

2015 ◽  
Vol 39 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 174-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincenzo Panichi ◽  
Alberto Rosati ◽  
Adriana Di Giorgio ◽  
Alessia Scatena ◽  
Roberto Bigazzi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Pharmacoeconomic Analysis ◽  
Phosphate Binders ◽  
Effectiveness Evaluation ◽  
C Reactive Protein ◽  
Stroke Incidence ◽  
Mortality And Morbidity ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Hospital Days

Background: A pharmacoeconomic analysis of the RISCAVID database aimed at assessing the cost effectiveness of phosphate binders in preventing CV mortality and morbidity over 7 years was performed. Methods: Morbid or fatal events occurring in 750 chronic HD patients were recorded. Statistical analysis evaluated the distribution of variables and the effect of sevelamer on survival. A cost-effectiveness evaluation was performed using a probabilistic model based on a Markov chain. Results: Multivariate analysis showed that treatment with sevelamer was associated with a reduced stroke incidence by 52% (p = 0.04) and reduced levels of C-reactive protein (p < 0.01). Cost-effectiveness evaluation evidenced a 33% decrease in hospital-days for patients treated with sevelamer, with and without comorbidities compared to patients undergoing calcium binders treatment. Conclusion: Treatment with sevelamer was associated with a reduced risk of stroke in HD patients, with a clear saving on disease-related costs for the Italian National Healthcare System.

scholarly journals Sequential Therapies and the Cost-Effectiveness of Treating Metastatic Colon Cancer Patients

2016 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 628-639 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andinet Woldemichael ◽  
Eberechukwu Onukwugha ◽  
Brian Seal ◽  
Nader Hanna ◽  
C. Daniel Mullins
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Metastatic Colon Cancer ◽  
The Cost

scholarly journals Pharmacoeconomic analysis of using typical and atypical antipsychotics in schizophrenia

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 9-24
Author(s):  
I. A. Vilyum ◽  
B. V. Andreev ◽  
M. A. Proskurin ◽  
Yu. E. Balykina
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Atypical Antipsychotics ◽  
Impact Analysis ◽  
Pharmacoeconomic Analysis ◽  
Cost Effectiveness Analysis ◽  
Resource Saving ◽  
Antipsychotic Therapy ◽  
Healthcare Budget ◽  
Effectiveness Analysis ◽  
The Cost

The aim: to provide a comprehensive pharmacoeconomic evaluation of the maintenance therapy with antipsychotics in outpatients diagnosed with schizophrenia.Materials and methods. The analysis was conducted by two mutually complementary steps: an epidemiological study on outpatients with schizophrenia, and a subsequent pharmacoeconomic modeling. Two medical technologies were evaluated and compared: treatment with classical antipsychotics (kA) and treatment with atypical antipsychotics (AA). For the clinical and economic analysis of these treatments, we used a number of indices derived from our retrospective study of patients’ medical records. The cost-effectiveness analysis, incremental analysis, and «budget impact» analysis were performed taking into account the direct and indirect costs of the treatments.Results. We determined the costs of managing outpatients with schizophrenia from the perspective of the healthcare budget and the social burdens; we also looked into the relevance and effectiveness of the current costs at various time intervals – 6, 12 and 24 months. As shown, the treatment strategies involving AA were more budget-consumptive than the kA treatments. even if the treatments were switched to the reproduced AA (up to 100% replacement), the costs would remain to be higher than those for the kA. The «cost-effectiveness» analysis related to «the proportion of stable patients» for the horizons of 6 and 12 months indicated that the reproduced AA would be more economically effective than the kA. However, when the observation period was increased to 24 months, this economic advantage of AA diminished, and the kA drugs had a lower CeR instead. For the «number of hospitalization-free days per year», the use of AA was more cost-effective only versus the 100% use of reproduced AA at the simulated horizon of 12 months. When the use of 100% reference AA or the combined use of reference + reproduced AA was simulated, the treatment with kA remained more economically effective, regardless of the simulated period.Conclusion. The pharmacoeconomic simulation of the antipsychotic therapy in outpatients with schizophrenia suggests the ways to optimize the treatment. Among them, (a) using AA for the treatment of at least 15.6% of patients (those who are employed); keeping the ≥60% use of kA to ensure the optimal resource-saving effect of the treatment; (b) using reproduced AA at the level of ≥70% (instead of the reference AA similar in efficacy and safety) to keep the treatment economically feasible. 

Clinical and economic evaluation of the effectiveness of the use of Riociguat for the treatment of patients with inoperable, recurrent or persistent chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension under the conditions of the Republic of Kazakhstan

2020 ◽  
Vol 3-4 (213-214) ◽  
pp. 8-16
Author(s):  
Andrey Avdeyev ◽  
◽  
Murat Mukarov ◽  
Sabira Zhaugasheva ◽  
Lubov Piven ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Hypertension ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Pharmacoeconomic Analysis ◽  
Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension ◽  
Medication Therapy ◽  
First Choice ◽  
Hospitalization Costs ◽  
Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension ◽  
The Cost ◽  
The Impact

Riociguat is included in international guidelines and local clinical protocols for the treatment of pulmonary hypertension (PH) and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), where it is the first choice drug for the treatment of patients with inoperable, persistent and recurrent forms of CTEPH. Therefore, it is necessary to include this drug in the GVoFMC (The Guaranteed Volume of Free Medical Care) reimbursement lists and the CSHI (Compulsory Social Health Insurance) system, which will alleviate access to medication for patients suffering from PH and CTEPH. Purpose of the study. Determination of the cost effectiveness parameters of using riociguat in comparison with bosentan and combined therapy of bosentan/sildenafil in medication therapy of CTEPH. Material and methods. A Markov model of CTEPH dynamics in patients with riociguat prescription was developed in comparison with application of bosentan and sildenafil. Modeling step was 16 weeks, modeling horizon – 10 years. Direct medical costs per patient were taken into account in the model, including the cost of drug therapy, costs of outpatient visits due to CTEPH, hospitalization costs due to clinical deterioration of CTEPH, emergency calls. Results and discussion. The results of “cost-effectiveness” Markov pharmacoeconomic modeling showed that riociguat application reveals a dominant position in comparison with the practice of using bosentan with addition of sildenafil for specific therapy at deterioration of patient's condition up to III-IV functional class (FC). Riociguat is characterized by the best values of “cost effectiveness” coefficients according to efficiency criterion of FC increase and the “value of 6-min walk distance test”. The results of analysis of the impact on budget showed that inclusion of riociguat in GVoFMC/CSHI will lead to budget savings of 154 million tenge in the first year, 294 million tenge in the second year and 415 million tenge in the third year compared to the existing clinical practice without riociguat use. Conclusions. On the basis of conducted complex pharmacoeconomic analysis, the application of riociguat in patients with inoperable or persistent/ recurrent form of CTEPH is a more preferable strategy in comparison with the strategy of application of bosentan with addition of sildenafil and will allow to reduce budget expenses within the framework of GVoFMC and CSHI system. Keywords: pulmonary hypertension, chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension, riociguat.

The clinical value and the cost-effectiveness of follow-up in endometrial cancer patients

2004 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 931-937 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. A. A. Tjalma ◽  
P. A. Van Dam ◽  
A. P. Makar ◽  
D. J. Cruickshank
Keyword(s):  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Evidence Base ◽  
Clinical Value ◽  
The Times ◽  
The Cost

The aim of the present article was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of follow-up in endometrial cancer patients. A literature review was performed regarding the studies that addressed routine follow-up of endometrial cancer. For each published study, the costs of the follow-up program were calculated according to Belgium standards. A mean total of 13% relapsed. Symptomatology and clinical examination detected over 83% of the recurrences. The follow-up cost in euro after 5 and 10 years ranged between 127.68 and 2028.78 and between 207.48 and 2353.48, respectively. Based on the available data, there is little evidence of routine follow-up improving survival rates. Multiple protocols are used in practice without an evidence base. There is an urgent need for prospective randomized studies to evaluate the value of the current so-called ‘standard medical practice of follow-up.’ It is to be expected that the cost of follow-up could be reduced considerably, for instance, by tailoring to low- and high-risk groups, or by abandoning routine follow-up. Symptomatic patients, however, should be evaluated immediately. A reduction in the number of visits and examinations would mean an enormous reduction in costs. This economic benefit would be warmly welcomed in the times of increased health costs and decreased budgets.

Pharmacoeconomic Analysis of Using Sinemet CR over Standard Sinemet in Parkinsonian Patients with Motor Fluctuations

1998 ◽  
Vol 32 (9) ◽  
pp. 878-883 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan G Hempel ◽  
Mary L Wagner ◽  
Mohamed A Maaty ◽  
Jacob I Sage
Keyword(s):  
Parkinson’S Disease ◽  
Parkinson's Disease ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Pharmacoeconomic Analysis ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Motor Fluctuations ◽  
University Teaching ◽  
Total Cost ◽  
Medication Costs ◽  
The Cost

OBJECTIVE: To compare the costs of pharmacotherapy in patients with Parkinson's disease before and after converting from standard Sinemet to extended-release Sinemet CR. DESIGN: Investigators retrospectively reviewed records of patients converting from Sinemet to Sinemet CR for efficacy and total drug costs. Cost-effectiveness was evaluated retrospectively from data collected in prospective Sinemet CR efficacy trials. SETTING: Parkinson's disease clinic at a tertiary care university teaching hospital. PATIENTS: 100 patients with motor fluctuations who had undergone an initial 6-month course of Sinemet therapy, followed by a 6-month course of Sinemet CR. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Total cost was measured as the cost of Sinemet formulations plus the costs of other antiparkinson medications. Differences in pre- and postconversion costs were compared by using the paired, two-tailed Student's t-test. A substudy of 39 patients on the cost-effectiveness of conversion measured the ratio of daily medication costs to the daily hours “on” without chorea. RESULTS: While total daily medication costs after conversion increased by 21%, patients experienced either a comparable or an improved degree of disease control with Sinemet CR. Patients who were also taking selegiline were able to decrease selegiline expense by 20%. The costs of other adjunctive medications did not differ significantly after conversion. The cost-effectiveness analysis revealed an increase in postconversion on time by 2.2 hours (p = 0.0001), accompanied by a $2.85 decrease in total cost per hour on without chorea (p = 0.11). CONCLUSIONS: Although Sinemet CR is more costly, it may be more cost-effective in patients with motor fluctuations. Some patients may be able to reduce adjunctive medications.

Use and Outcomes of Epoetin Alfa and Darbepoetin Alfa for Anemic Cancer Patients in Outpatient Community Practice Settings.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 5588-5588 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyle R. Fahrbach ◽  
Diana Frame ◽  
Brian Sercus ◽  
Brad Schenkel
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Darbepoetin Alfa ◽  
Selection Criteria ◽  
Tumor Type ◽  
Community Practice ◽  
Epoetin Alfa ◽  
Treatment Episode ◽  
End Of Treatment ◽  
Dosing Regimens ◽  
The Cost

Abstract Objective: To assess the treatment patterns and hematologic outcomes associated with epoetin alfa (EPO) and darbepoetin alfa (DARB) for the treatment of anemic cancer patients in the community practice setting. Methods: A retrospective observational study design was used. De-identified data from patients receiving care in community oncology practice settings were obtained from an electronic medical record system. Eligible patients were >= 18 years of age, had a cancer diagnosis, and were treated with an erythropoiesis stimulating agent (ESA: EPO or DARB) during the period July 2002 – July 2004, with baseline anemia (Hb<=11 g/dL) and at least one follow-up Hb value. No other selection criteria were applied (e.g. ESA dose, tumor type, chemotherapy treatment) in keeping with the objective of characterizing outcomes in a real-world setting. Data were summarized by treatment overall and by using a multivariate model adjusting for age, gender, baseline Hb, clinic site, ECOG performance score, type of cancer (solid vs hematologic) and chemotherapy (platinum vs non-platinum vs. none). Patient selection criteria and analytic methods were determined prospectively. The cost for each ESA was calculated based on 2004 average wholesale prices ($13.36 per EPO 1,000 U; $4.99 per 1 mcg DARB). Results: 2382 EPO and 1399 DARB patients were eligible for analysis. The two groups were comparable in terms of baseline characteristics (62% female, 75% solid tumors, mean baseline Hb 9.9 g/dL). Only about two-thirds of patients were treated with standard dosing regimens of the two agents in the US (EPO 40,000 U qw, DARB 200 mcg q2w). Hematologic outcomes observed in patients receiving EPO were consistently better than those in patients receiving DARB. Table 1. Hematologic outcomes by ESA treatment EPO DARB p value Week 4 Hb change (g/dL) 0.79 0.59 <0.001 % Early Hb response (Hb change >=1 g/dL at 4 weeks) 61.5 55.2 0.004 % Hb response (Hb change >=2 g/dL by end of treatment episode) 41.4 34.7 <0.001 % Hematopoietic response (Hb change >= 2 g/dL or reaching 12 g/dL by end of treatment episode) 52.3 44.6 <0.001 The mean treatment durations for patients receiving EPO and DARB were 55.3 and 62.5 days, respectively. Mean cumulative doses were 231,211 U for EPO and 857 mcg for DARB. These doses resulted in an average cost per patient of $3,089 for those receiving EPO and $4,276 for those receiving DARB. Conclusion: These results, based on over 3000 community-treated cancer patients, reinforce previous findings of earlier and greater overall hematologic response for EPO vs. DARB in this setting. Additionally, based on mean cumulative doses, the cost of DARB per patient was substantially greater than that of EPO. Additional studies of variations in dosing regimens used in the community setting are warranted, as are well-powered, randomized, controlled trials to further confirm the clinical results observed here.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document