scholarly journals EFFECT OF TWO DIFFERENT SURFACE TREATMENTS ON MICRO-SHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF CAD/CAM AND HEAT PRESSED GLASS CERAMICS

2019 ◽  
Vol 65 (2) ◽  
pp. 1853-1864
Author(s):  
Shereen Salem ◽  
Ahmed Ziada ◽  
Khaled Elbanna
Author(s):  
Veber Luiz Bomfim Azevedo ◽  
Eduardo Fernandes Castro ◽  
Jean‐Jacques Bonvent ◽  
Oswaldo Scopin Andrade ◽  
Fábio Dupart Nascimento ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mustafa Mehmet Özarslan ◽  
Özlem Üstün ◽  
Ulviye Sebnem Buyukkaplan ◽  
Çağatay Barutcigil ◽  
Nurullah Türker ◽  
...  

Adult orthodontics may confront problems related to the bonding performance of orthodontic brackets to new generation restorative materials used for crown or laminate restorations. The aim of the present study was to investigate the shear bond strength of ceramic brackets to two new generation CAD/CAM interpenetrating network composite and nanoceramic composite after different surface treatments. Er,Cr:YSGG Laser, hydrofluoric acid (9%), sandblasting (50 μm Al2O3), and silane were applied to the surfaces of 120 CAD/CAM specimens with 2 mm thickness and then ceramic brackets were bonded to the treated surfaces of the specimens. Bond strength was evaluated using the shear bond strength test. According to the results, CAD/CAM block types and surface treatment methods have significant effects on shear bond strength. The lowest bond strength values were found in the specimens treated with silane (3.35 ± 2.09 MPa) and highest values were found in the specimens treated with sandblast (8.92 ± 2.77 MPa). Sandblasting and hydrofluoric acid surface treatment led to the most durable bonds for the two types of CAD/CAM blocks in the present study. In conclusion, different surface treatments affect the shear bond strength of ceramic brackets to CAD/CAM interpenetrating network composite and nanoceramic composite. Among the evaluated treatments, sandblasting and hydrofluoric acid application resulted in sufficient bonding strength to ceramic brackets for both of the CAD/CAM materials.


10.19082/5487 ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 5487-5493 ◽  
Author(s):  
Faraneh Mokhtarpour ◽  
Homayoon Alaghehmand ◽  
Soraya Khafri

Materials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 1468
Author(s):  
Alaaeldin Elraggal ◽  
Nikolaos Silikas

Zirconia repair could be a feasible alternative option to total replacement in fractured zirconia-based restorations. Maximising the bond strength by enriching zirconia with fluorapatite glass-ceramics (FGC) powder has been addressed and compared to other surface treatments. Besides resin composite, other repair materials have been proposed and compared. Zirconia blocks received different surface treatments (A—sandblasting with tribochemical silica-coated alumina (CoJet). B—sandblasting with FGC powder (FGC), C—fluorapatite glass-ceramic coat+ neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet laser irradiation (FGC + Nd: YAG), and D—no surface treatment). The surface roughness, topography, and crystallinity were investigated by a profilometer, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and X-ray diffraction (XRD) analyses, respectively. For each surface treatment, three repair materials (feldspathic porcelain, lithium disilicate, and resin composite) were bonded to zirconia with 10, Methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP)–Monobond Plus/ Multilink Automix. Bonded specimens were thermocycled for 10,000 cycles and tested for shear bond strength (SBS) at a speed of 1 mm/min, followed by the analysis of the mode of failure. FGC + Nd: YAG laser group reported the highest surface roughness and monoclinic content compared to CoJet, FGC, and control groups. The highest mean SBS was found in FGC-blasted zirconia, followed by FGC + Nd: YAG laser and CoJet treated groups. However, the lowest SBS was found in control groups regardless of the repair material. Sandblasting zirconia with FGC powder increased SBS of resin to zirconia with lower monoclinic phase transformation compared to FGC + Nd: YAG or CoJet groups.


2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 259 ◽  
Author(s):  
Merve Bankoğlu Güngör ◽  
Seçil Karakoca Nemli ◽  
Bilge Turhan Bal ◽  
Senem Ünver ◽  
Aylin Doğan

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document