Scientific research ethics for theses dissertations (MA & PhD) in the field of library and information: An analytical study

Author(s):  
Amr Fatouh
Webology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (Special Issue 04) ◽  
pp. 303-318
Author(s):  
Dr. Sumaya Abbas Majeed Al-Rubaye

The study is based on the idea that for a good determination of the techniques adopted in pushing or withdrawing information and knowledge according to the requirements of the type of decisions and according to the appropriate time will lead to achieving a performance that exceeds the ministry's expectations and outside the familiar and the scheme and on that the researcher used the philosophical analysis and preparation of a questionnaire using the Likert pentagon scale and the adoption of descriptive and statistical analysis of the side results Practical, where I found a correlation and influence between the variables of the study, but it is relatively medium in most of its variables to show the ministry's need to support and enhance the capabilities necessary for workers to obtain knowledge at the specified time for the urgent need for them to accomplish the tasks entrusted to them.


2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 216-226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel V. Bruton ◽  
Mitch Brown ◽  
Donald F. Sacco

Over the past couple of decades, the apparent widespread occurrence of Questionable Research Practices (QRPs) in scientific research has been widely discussed in the research ethics literature as a source of concern. Various ways of reducing their use have been proposed and implemented, ranging from improved training and incentives for adopting best practices to systematic reforms. This article reports on the results of two studies that investigated the efficacy of simple, psychological interventions aimed at changing researcher attitudes toward QRPs. While the interventions did not significantly modify researchers’ reactions to QRPs, they showed differential efficacy depending on scientists’ experience, suggesting complexities in researcher psychology and the ethics of QRPs that merit further study.


1995 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 199-204
Author(s):  
Deni Elliott ◽  
Patricia Blanford ◽  
Marci Watson ◽  

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 3515-3523
Author(s):  
Rana Al Smadi ◽  
◽  
Khawla Alsaida ◽  
Duha Aboud ◽  
◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 222
Author(s):  
Özcan Erkan AKGÜN ◽  
Burçin HAMUTOĞLU ◽  
Ezgi Pelin YILDIZ

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Wang ◽  
Feifei Zhang

Abstract BackgroundPostgraduate medical students’scientific research capability is an essential part for educational system, the current research on students’ research behavior mainly focused on the students’research attitude ,innovative ability and training methods and approaches. Therefore, we carried out this study to explore the evaluation index of postgraduate medical students’scientific research capacity,in order to establish a framework of postgraduate medical students’scientific evaluation.MethodsWe designed a 39-items questionnaire to explore the evaluation index of research capacity on the perspective of postgraduate students .The questionnaire consisted of items including demographics and other 34 items about index reflect one’s scientific research ability.The participants choose the number(1-5) according the importance of each items they think.1 means not important at all;2 means not important;3 means neutral;4 means important;5 means very important.ResultsThe most important indices are ”Follow three basic ethical principles: respect, benefit and justice”(4.46±0.845);”Resist behaviour such as"data fraud, submission fraud" and other academic misconduct(4.44±0.922)”;”Adhere to the principle of patient-oriented, fully informed and voluntary participation”(4.36±0.871);”The questionnaire can be divided into four parties”Research skills and output(36.046%)”,“Theoretical and practical basis(16.034%)”,”Study Attitude(14.411)”,”Ethical of research(8.371%)”.ConclusionWe should strengthen the training of scientific research ethics knowledge, ethical consciousness and scientific research ethics of postgraduate medical students;Improve the consciousness of patent granted;Enhance the research interest of clinical-oriented students and verify the scientific of the questionnaire further.


2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (11) ◽  
pp. 3-16
Author(s):  
A. Zemskov

To what extent do academic and research libraries contribute to the work of their mother organizations, i.e. research institutes and universities? What is the role of libraries in scientific research? Which problems do hinder the development of librarianship? These and related questions were in the focus of an analytical study conducted in 2018 by Springer Nature, which sent many questionnaires to the libraries around the world with a supplementary limiting interview of 20 librarians. Some part of the responses was quite predictable, and respondents specified the library problems as lacking money, underestimation of the library services and libraries themselves, toughening requirements of university community, and expanding needs of research teams. The respondents often mentioned new, positive approaches in the work of libraries – support of researchers willing to publishing their papers, building and maintaining repositories, increasing independence of libraries in acquisition process and collection development. The study findings offer some solutions to the dispute about the status of libraries and their prospects, which is held by our reputable experts, e.g. V. K. Stepanov, Yu. N. Stolyarov, etc.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document