scholarly journals AN ECONOMIC STUDY FOR TARGET AGRICULTURAL INVESTMENT IN THE EGYPTIAN AGRICULTURAL SECTOR دراسة اقتصادیة للاستثمارات الزراعیة وإنتاجیتها المستهدفة فی القطاع الزراعی

2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 171-183
Author(s):  
وائل العبد ◽  
علاء الدین الشبراوى
Author(s):  
Elena Stepanovna Ustinovich ◽  
Tatyana Petrovna Boldyreva

It is clear to everyone that investment in the agricultural sector in developing countries is one of the most effective ways to reduce poverty and hunger in the world. Agricultural investment can generate a wide range of development opportunities. However, these benefi ts cannot be expected to arise automatically. Some forms of large-scale investment pose significant risks to investor states. It should be noted, however, that, despite discussions about the potential benefits and risks of international investment, there is still no evidence of negative actual consequences for the countries receiving investments. This article examines the issues of investment activity in relation to developing countries using the example of US agribusiness entities.


2013 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 80-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex Ehimare Omankhanlen

This empirical case study investigated the uncertainty of agricultural investment schemes in Nigeria and their relationship to national domestic production. Government administrations have invested a substantial amount of money into the agricultural sector, yet thus far, there have been very few visible results to show for it. The private sector does not seem to be interested in developing agriculture even with government incentives. The purpose of this study is to identify investment risk factors for national agriculture development as perceived by business stakeholders. Ordinary Least Square (OLS) was then used to examine the strength of the cause-effect relationship for the agricultural investment factors in terms of expected domestic production. The findings were that there was no significant relationship between commercial bank credit granting to businesses for agricultural development and therefore no impact on national domestic production. On the other hand, the regression analysis did support the hypotheses that there was a significant relationship between government funding towards the agricultural sector and national domestic production as well as a significant relationship between the public agriculture credit guarantee scheme and national domestic production, respectively. Based on this positive finding, the study closes with several unique recommendations for policy makers in order to stimulate the investment into the agricultural sector to increase national production.


1977 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 523-555 ◽  
Author(s):  
Merilee S. Grindle

The six-year presidency or sexenio of Luís Echeverría Alvarez was initiated in December of 1970. Six years later, significant changes had taken place in the public policies espoused by the Mexican regime. Most importantly, perhaps, the federal government shifted its public investment priorities away from an overriding preoccupation with industrial development toward greater concern for agricultural development. From 1971 to 1976, Echeverria's administration allocated more money to the agricultural sector than any sexenio since that of Miguel Alemán (1946 to 1952). The change occurred gradually, federal public investment in agriculture growing from 14.5% of the total in 1971 to 20% budgeted for 1975 and 1976. Increased attention to agriculture was achieved primarily through proportional reductions in investments for industrial and infrastructure development. Along with a revision in sectoral allocations went a change in policy concerning both the anticipated outcome and the target population for agricultural investment.


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wa Ode Kuliati ◽  
Azhar Bafadal ◽  
Weka Gusmiarty Abdullah

This study aims to analyze the level of inequality of agricultural development in the region of Southeast Sulawesi. The data used in this study is the type of secondary data that is time series and cross section (panel data), with period time of 2010-2015. Research variables consisted of GDP of agriculture sector, direct government expenditure, local income, and labor of agriculture sector, which then analyzed with Williamson Index approach. The results showed that the level of inequality of agricultural sector development in the mainland in Southeast Sulawesi (Konawe, Kolaka, Kendari, Konawe Selatan, Bombana, North Kolaka, North Konawe and East Kolaka) were generally high. This can be seen from the value of Williamson Index in 2010-2011 ranged from 0.4827 to 0.6607. Therefore, it is necessary to plan and policy in directing agricultural investment allocation towards a more balanced economic progress throughout the region.Keywords: Williamson index; high inequality; agricultural sector


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document