Minimally invasive flapless corticotomy for accelerating orthodontic tooth movement: a literature review

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (12) ◽  
pp. 30-33
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Tooth Movement ◽  
Orthodontic Tooth Movement

scholarly journals Micro-osteoperforations and Its Effect on the Rate of Tooth Movement: A Systematic Review

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khalifa S. Al-Khalifa ◽  
Hosam A. Baeshen
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Cortical Bone ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Tooth Movement ◽  
Treatment Time ◽  
Orthodontic Tooth Movement ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Electronic Search ◽  
Invasive Method ◽  
Regional Acceleratory Phenomenon

AbstractProlonged orthodontic treatments have inconvenienced patients and clinicians alike. Surgically assisted techniques for accelerating orthodontic tooth movement have shown promising results in the literature over the years. The minimally invasive nature of micro-osteoperforations (MOPs), however, for enhanced orthodontic tooth movement has recently gained momentum, with many clinical trials conducted on both animals and humans. An electronic search was performed to extract papers using PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science. The keywords that were used included “MOP,” “accelerating tooth movement,” “orthodontic tooth movement,” and “regional acceleratory phenomenon.” The studies that met our inclusion criteria were extracted and evaluated in this review. MOPs have been proven time and again, in animal and human studies alike, to increase the rate of orthodontic tooth movement. The application of perforations to cortical bone present in the pathway of teeth, which are specifically to be moved creates transient osteopenia. This reduces the density of the cortical bone, hence speeding up the rate of orthodontic tooth movement. Many techniques have been implemented and perfected to enhance orthodontic tooth movement and shorten the treatment time in the literature. MOPs have proven to be a universally applied, nontechnical, repeatable, and minimally invasive method of accelerating tooth movement, with extremely minimal consequences.

scholarly journals Minimally Invasive Techniques to Accelerate the Orthodontic Tooth Movement: A Systematic Review of Animal Studies

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irfan Qamruddin ◽  
Mohammad Khursheed Alam ◽  
Mohd Fadhli Khamis ◽  
Adam Husein
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Animal Studies ◽  
Tooth Movement ◽  
Mechanical Vibration ◽  
Orthodontic Tooth Movement ◽  
Low Level Laser Therapy ◽  
Minimally Invasive Procedures ◽  
Minimally Invasive Techniques ◽  
Invasive Procedures ◽  
Invasive Techniques

Objective. To evaluate various noninvasive and minimally invasive procedures for the enhancement of orthodontic tooth movement in animals.Materials and Methods. Literature was searched using NCBI (PubMed, PubMed Central, and PubMed Health), MedPilot (Medline, Catalogue ZB MED, Catalogue Medicine Health, and Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE)), and Google Scholar from January 2009 till 31 December 2014. We included original articles related to noninvasive and minimally invasive procedures to enhance orthodontic tooth movement in animals. Extraction of data and quality assessments were carried out by two observers independently.Results. The total number of hits was 9195 out of which just 11 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Nine articles were good and 5 articles were moderate in quality. Low level laser therapy (LLLT) was among the most common noninvasive techniques whereas flapless corticision using various instruments was among the commonest minimally invasive procedures to enhance velocity of tooth movement.Conclusions. LLLT, low intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS), mechanical vibration, and flapless corticision are emerging noninvasive and minimally invasive techniques which need further researches to establish protocols to use them clinically with conviction.

scholarly journals Considerações sobre reimplantes dentários: condutas clínicas e ortodônticas frente a estas situações

2021 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-38
Author(s):  
Daniela Soeiro de Souza Rezende ◽  
Márcia Delgado de Ávila ◽  
Eduardo Silveira Ferreira
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Tooth Movement ◽  
Root Resorption ◽  
Orthodontic Tooth Movement ◽  
Clinical Approach ◽  
Orthodontic Appliance ◽  
Minimum Period ◽  
Orthodontic Movement ◽  
One Year

Based on a literature review, the objective of this study is to establish the degree of dental analysis or root resorption that allows replanted teeth to be moved using orthodontic appliance. Some aspects of avulsion and replanted teeth such as etiology, clinical approach and prognosis are considered. It is also presented a literature review of orthodontic tooth movement. According to most authors, the replant is frequently followed by analysis that doesn't allow orthodontic movement. Nevertheless, the lack of resorption signs during a minimum period of one year allows orthodontic treatment when necessary.

scholarly journals Management of a Facilitated Aesthetic Orthodontic Treatment with Clear Aligners and Minimally Invasive Corticotomy

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 19
Author(s):  
Silvia Caruso ◽  
Atanaz Darvizeh ◽  
Stefano Zema ◽  
Roberto Gatto ◽  
Alessandro Nota
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Tooth Movement ◽  
Time Window ◽  
Orthodontic Tooth Movement ◽  
Open Bite ◽  
Anterior Open Bite ◽  
Space Closure ◽  
Safe Technique ◽  
Treatment Application

Accelerating orthodontic tooth movement has become a topical issue and the corticotomy seems to be the only effective and safe technique reported in the literature. Simultaneously, aesthetic orthodontic treatment with removable clear aligners has become commonly requested. The aim of this paper is to illustrate the management of facilitated aesthetic orthodontic treatment, a combined approach including piezocision corticotomy and clear aligners for orthodontic treatment. Orthodontic planning for traditional clear aligners should be modified to take advantage of the corticotomy technique in order to facilitate the most difficult orthodontic movements needed to achieve treatment completion, where each aligner will be used for four days rather than 15 days for a total time of four months. A corticotomy with a modified minimally invasive flapless piezocision technique should be performed in both jaws at the same time, before the time window of the orthodontic treatment, where the most difficult orthodontic movements are planned. Treatment planning where difficult orthodontic movements, such as anterior open-bite closure and extraction space closure, are easily managed with clear aligners and are presented as examples of facilitated aesthetic orthodontic treatment application. The combination between aesthetic treatment with clear aligners and modified piezocision corticotomy, if carefully planned, seems to represent a synergy that achieves the current goals of orthodontic treatment. The primary objectives of this combination should be facilitating difficult orthodontic movements and reducing treatment duration.

Effectiveness and Safety of Minimally Invasive Orthodontic Tooth Movement Acceleration: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 98 (13) ◽  
pp. 1469-1479 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Fu ◽  
S. Liu ◽  
H. Zhao ◽  
M. Cao ◽  
R. Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Minimally Invasive Surgery ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Invasive Surgery ◽  
Tooth Movement ◽  
Treatment Time ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Orthodontic Tooth Movement ◽  
Sufficient Evidence

Doctors and patients attempt to accelerate orthodontic tooth movement with a minimally invasive surgery approach. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the evidence of accelerated tooth movement in minimally invasive surgery and the adverse effects from it. A systematic search of the literature was performed in the electronic databases of PubMed, CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Science Direct, and Medline and was complemented by a manual search until February 2019. The inclusion criteria were prospective clinical studies of patients treated with a fixed appliance, and the intervention was accelerated orthodontic treatment with minimally invasive surgery. Nineteen articles (538 participants) were included in the review: 9 studies assessed the rate of upper canine movement; 5 considered the treatment time; 1 evaluated the en masse retraction time; and 4 studied adverse effects. We performed a meta-analysis for the rate of canine movement and treatment time and described the results for the adverse effects in a systematic review. The results of the subgroup analysis according to micro-osteoperforation and piezocision were included in the study. No accelerated tooth movement was found in the micro-osteoperforation group. After flapless corticotomy procedures, increased tooth movement rates were identified by weighted mean differences of 0.63 (95%CI = 0.22, 1.03, P = 0.003) and 0.64 (95% CI, −25 to 1.53; P = 0.16) for 1 and 2 mo, respectively. The mean treatment time was 68.42 d (95% CI, −113.19 to −23.65; P = 0.003) less that than for minimally invasive surgery. Moreover, no significant adverse effect was found. Because of the high heterogeneity of the meta-analysis, the results must be validated by additional large-sample multicenter clinical trials. There is not sufficient evidence to support that the single use of micro-osteoperforation could accelerate tooth movement, and there is only low-quality evidence to prove that flapless corticotomy could accelerate tooth movement.

scholarly journals Pain and Tissue Damage in Response to Orthodontic Tooth Movement: Are They Correlated?

2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (9) ◽  
pp. 713-720 ◽  
Author(s):  
Osmar A Cuoghi ◽  
Francielle Topolski ◽  
Lorraine P de Faria ◽  
Marcos R de Mendonça
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
Tissue Damage ◽  
Tooth Movement ◽  
Root Resorption ◽  
Scientific Evidence ◽  
Orthodontic Tooth Movement ◽  
Systematic Analysis ◽  
Orthodontic Force ◽  
Orthodontic Pain ◽  
Definition Of

ABSTRACT Aim To evaluate the correlation between pain and tissue damage in response to orthodontic tooth movement (OTM), such as hyalinization and external apical root resorption (EARR). Materials and methods The literature review was used as a methodological strategy, following the knowledge development process – constructivist (ProKnow-C). Study axes were defined and keywords that best represented each axis were selected. The terms were submitted to an adherence test and validation, resulting in 12 keyword combinations. Searches were carried out in the most representative databases for the selected terms, without restriction as for language or publication dates. Retrieved studies were filtered using the EndNote X6 program and classified according to analysis of title, abstract, and keywords. The final portfolio of articles was submitted to bibliometric and systematic analysis. Results A total of 1,091 studies were retrieved, out of which 719 were repeated and 335 were removed in the classification stage. A total of 37 articles remained in the final portfolio. Only one article was in line with the purpose of this study, indicating absence of correlation between pain and EARR in response to OTM. Conclusion Further studies are necessary to confirm whether orthodontic pain might serve as a criterion for the use of appropriate mechanical forces, contributing to minimize tissue damage following OTM. Clinical significance This article presents a systematic literature review, in which scientific evidence of the correlation between pain and tissue damage during orthodontic movement was studied, providing a scientific answer for the following question: Is pain reported by patients associated with application of inappropriate orthodontic force? Thus, it aims at aiding the orthodontist in the definition of clinical parameters for the use of optimal orthodontic force. How to cite this article Cuoghi OA, Topolski F, de Faria LP, de Mendonça MR. Pain and Tissue Damage in Response to Orthodontic Tooth Movement: Are They Correlated? J Contemp Dent Pract 2016;17(9):713-720.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document