Once-daily ropinirole reduces 'off' time in Parkinson's disease

2007 ◽  
Vol &NA; (1582-1583) ◽  
pp. 16
Author(s):  
&NA;
Author(s):  
Clémence Leung ◽  
Olivier Rascol ◽  
Margherita Fabbri

Since 2016, opicapone (OPC), a potent third-generation, long-acting, once-daily, peripheral catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitor, is approved as add-on to levodopa in Parkinson’s disease patients with motor fluctuations. OPC 50 mg has showed to be able in reducing OFF time by an average of about 60 min daily compared with placebo, to further reduce OFF-time of about 39 min, when switched from ENT to OPC and to be safe. These beneficial effects of OPC were maintained for 1 year. Recently, several post hoc analysis and few pilot observational open-label studies, have suggested its efficacy and wider applicability for different phenotypes of motor complications and for Parkinson’s disease stages. Here we review OPC applicability and perspectives, in the light of the more recently published analysis.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Robert A. Hauser ◽  
Nobutaka Hattori ◽  
Hubert Fernandez ◽  
Stuart H. Isaacson ◽  
Hideki Mochizuki ◽  
...  

Background: Istradefylline is a selective adenosine A2A receptor antagonist for the treatment of patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) experiencing OFF episodes while on levodopa/decarboxylase inhibitor. Objective: This pooled analysis of eight randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 2b/3 studies evaluated the efficacy and safety of istradefylline. Methods: Istradefylline was evaluated in PD patients receiving levodopa with carbidopa/benserazide and experiencing motor fluctuations. Eight 12- or 16-week trials were conducted (n = 3,245); four of these studies were the basis for istradefylline’s FDA approval. Change in OFF time as assessed in patient-completed 24-h PD diaries at Week 12 was the primary endpoint. All studies were designed with common methodology, thereby permitting pooling of data. Pooled analysis results from once-daily oral istradefylline (20 and 40 mg/day) and placebo were evaluated using a mixed-model repeated-measures approach including study as a factor. Results: Among 2,719 patients (placebo, n = 992; 20 mg/day, n = 848; 40 mg/day, n = 879), OFF hours/day were reduced at Week 12 at istradefylline dosages of 20 mg/day (least-squares mean difference [LSMD] from placebo in reduction from baseline [95%CI], –0.38 h [–0.61, –0.15]) and 40 mg/day (–0.45 h [–0.68, –0.22], p <  0.0001); ON time without troublesome dyskinesia (ON-WoTD) significantly increased. Similar results were found in the four-study pool (OFF hours/day, 20 mg/day, –0.75 h [–1.10, –0.40]; 40 mg/day, –0.82 h [–1.17, –0.47]). Istradefylline was generally well-tolerated; the average study completion rate among istradefylline-treated patients across all studies was 89.2%. Dyskinesia was the most frequent adverse event (placebo, 9.6%; 20 mg/day, 16.1%; 40 mg/day, 17.7%). Conclusion: In this pooled analysis, istradefylline significantly improved OFF time and ON-WoTD relative to placebo and was well-tolerated.


Author(s):  
Thomas Müller

Amantadine is an old, antiviral compound, which moderately improves motor behavior in Parkinson's disease. Its current resurgence results from an innovative, delayed uptake and extended release amantadine hydrochloride capsule, given at bedtime once daily. It is the only approved compound for reduction of involuntary movements, so called dyskinesia, in fluctuating orally levodopa treated patients. It additionally ameliorates ‘off’-intervals characterized by impaired motor behavior. These beneficial effects result from higher and more continuous brain delivery of amantadine. Future clinical research is warranted on preventive effects of this amantadine capsule combined with enzyme blockers of central monoamine oxidase B and peripheral catechol-O-methyltransferase on motor complications in orally levodopa treated patients, as all these pharmacological principles support the concept of continuous dopamine substitution.


2020 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
C. Warren Olanow ◽  
Alberto J. Espay ◽  
Fabrizio Stocchi ◽  
Aaron L. Ellenbogen ◽  
Mika Leinonen ◽  
...  

Background: ND0612 is a continuous, subcutaneous levodopa/carbidopa delivery system in development for patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) experiencing motor fluctuations Objective: Evaluate the efficacy and safety of two ND0612 dosing regimens in patients with PD. Methods: This was a 28-day open-label study (NCT02577523) in PD patients with ≥2.5 hours/day of OFF time despite optimized treatment. Patients were randomized to treatment with either a 24-hour infusion (levodopa/carbidopa dose of 720/90 mg) or a 14-hour ‘waking-day’ infusion (levodopa/carbidopa dose of 538/68 mg plus a morning oral dose of 150/15 mg). In-clinic assessments of OFF time (primary endpoint) and ON time with or without dyskinesia were determined by a blinded rater over 8 hours (normalized to 16 hours). Results: A total of 38 patients were randomized and 33 (87% ) completed the study. Compared to baseline, OFF time for the overall population was reduced by a least squares (LS) mean[95% CI] of 2.0[– 3.3, – 0.7] hours (p = 0.003). ON time with no/mild dyskinesia was increased from baseline by a LS mean of 3.3[2.0, 4.6] hours (p <  0.0001), and ON time with moderate/severe dyskinesia was reduced by a LS mean of 1.2[– 1.8, – 0.5] hours (p≤0.001). Reduction in OFF time was larger in the 24-hour group (– 2.8[– 4.6, – 0.9] hours; p = 0.004) than in the 14-hour group (– 1.3[– 3.1, 0.5] hours; p = 0.16). Complete resolution of OFF time was observed in 42% (n = 8) of patients in the 24-hour group. Infusion site reactions were the most common adverse event. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the feasibility and safety of continuous subcutaneous delivery of levodopa as a treatment for PD and provides preliminary evidence of efficacy.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Cindy Zadikoff ◽  
Werner Poewe ◽  
James T. Boyd ◽  
Lars Bergmann ◽  
Horia Ijacu ◽  
...  

Background. Levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) provides continuous levodopa administration and clinical benefits to patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease (PD). This report evaluates long-term safety and efficacy of high-dose LCIG in PD patients. Methods. Data were collected from several prospective, phase III clinical studies and an observational registry. The phase III program (N = 412) included four multicenter studies: a 12-week, randomized, double-blind study and three open-label studies extending ≥12 months. GLORIA (N = 375) was a 24-month, multicountry, observational registry. LCIG safety (adverse effects (AEs)/adverse drug reactions (ADRs)) and efficacy (modified Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) part IV item 32 and 39 scores for “On” time with dyskinesia and “Off” time) were assessed in patients who received ≥2000 mg/day vs <2000 mg/day LCIG. Results. A total of 72 of 412 (17.5%) patients required dosages ≥2000 mg/day LCIG in the phase III program and 47 of 375 (12.5%) patients in GLORIA. Baseline demographics and disease severity were similar between dosage groups with more men in the high-dosage group. Compared with the <2000 mg/day dosage group, patients requiring ≥2000 mg/day LCIG had higher rates of AEs/ADRs including polyneuropathy; improvements in “Off” time and discontinuations due to AEs were similar between dosage groups and lower for discontinuations due to ADRs reported in GLORIA. Conclusions. Patients who require ≥2000 mg/day LCIG exhibited a safety profile comparable to the established safety/tolerability of LCIG with similar clinical improvements. Higher AEs were noted but within what is accepted for LCIG. Continuous administration of LCIG is beneficial to advanced PD patients who require very high doses of levodopa.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haruo Nishijima ◽  
Yasuo Miki ◽  
Shinya Ueno ◽  
Masahiko Tomiyama

Zonisamide is a relatively recent drug for Parkinson’s disease. Multiple hypotheses have been proposed to explain the antiparkinsonian effects of zonisamide. However, it is still unclear whether the effect of zonisamide is mainly due to dopaminergic modification in the striatum, or if zonisamide works through nondopaminergic pathways. We conducted the present study to determine the mechanism that is mainly responsible for zonisamide’s effects in Parkinson’s disease. We examined the effects of zonisamide on motor symptoms in a hemiparkinsonian rat model when administered singly, coadministered with levodopa, a dopamine precursor, or apomorphine, a D1 and D2 dopamine receptor agonist. We used 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned hemiparkinsonian rats, which were allocated to one of five groups: 14 rats received levodopa only (6 mg/kg), 12 rats received levodopa (6 mg/kg) plus zonisamide (50 mg/kg), six rats received apomorphine only (0.05 mg/kg), six rats received apomorphine (0.05 mg/kg) plus zonisamide (50 mg/kg), and six rats received zonisamide only (50 mg/kg). The drugs were administered once daily for 15 days. We evaluated abnormal involuntary movement every 20 min during a 3 h period following the injection of drugs on treatment Days 1, 8, and 15. Western blot analyses for dopamine decarboxylase and vesicular monoamine transferase-2 were performed using striatal tissues in the lesioned side of rats in the levodopa only group (n = 6) and levodopa plus zonisamide group (n = 4). Levodopa-induced abnormal involuntary movement was significantly enhanced by coadministration of zonisamide. In contrast, zonisamide had no effect on apomorphine-induced abnormal involuntary movement. Zonisamide monotherapy did not induce abnormal involuntary movement. Zonisamide did not affect striatal expression of dopamine decarboxylase or vesicular monoamine transferase-2. In conclusion, zonisamide appears to generate its antiparkinsonian effects by modulating levodopa-dopamine metabolism in the parkinsonian striatum.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Javier Pagonabarraga ◽  
José Matías Arbelo ◽  
Francisco Grandas ◽  
Maria-Rosario Luquin ◽  
Pablo Martínez Martín ◽  
...  

Safinamide is an approved drug for the treatment of motor fluctuations in Parkinson’s disease (PD). Scarce data are available on its use in clinical practice. A group of Spanish movement disorders specialists was convened to review the use of safinamide across different clinical scenarios that may guide neurologists in clinical practice. Eight specialists with recognized expertise in PD management elaborated the statements based on available evidence in the literature and on their clinical experience. The RAND/UCLA method was carried, with final conclusions accepted after a 2-round modified Delphi process. Higher level of agreement between panellists was reached for the following statements. Safinamide significantly improves mean daily OFF time without troublesome dyskinesias. Adjunctive treatment with safinamide is associated with motor improvements in patients with mid-to-late PD. The efficacy of safinamide on motor fluctuations is maintained at long-term, with no increase over time in dyskinesias severity. The clinical benefits of safinamide on pain and depression remain unclear. Safinamide presents a similar incidence of adverse events compared with placebo. The efficacy and safety of safinamide shown in the pivotal clinical trials are reproduced in clinical practice, with improvement of parkinsonian symptoms, decrease of daily OFF time, control of dyskinesias at the long term, and good tolerability and safety.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document