Bio-desulfurization and denitrification by anaerobic-anoxic process for the treatment of wastewater from flue gas washing

2013 ◽  
Vol 67 (9) ◽  
pp. 2042-2049 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ziyu Song ◽  
Xuemei Zhou ◽  
Yuguang Li ◽  
Maohua Yang ◽  
Jianmin Xing

For amine-based carbon dioxide capture, nitrogen oxides and sulfur oxides were the main pollutants that had a negative effect on the regeneration of solvent. Before carbon dioxide capture, the sulfur oxides in flue gas should be removed by the method of calcium salt, and then washed by alkaline solution to eliminate the residual nitrogen oxides and sulfur oxides. The washing wastewater containing sulfate and nitrate needs to be treated. In this study, a novel anaerobic-anoxic process was built up for the treatment of this washing wastewater. Nitrate was reduced to nitrogen by denitrifying bacteria. Sulfate was firstly reduced to sulfide by sulfate reducing bacteria, and then selectively oxidized to element sulfur by sulfide oxidizing bacteria. The treated liquid could be reused as absorption after the adjustment of pH value. The performances of this bioprocess were investigated under various pH values and S/N ratios. It was found that the optimal pH value of influent was 6.0, the percentages of denitrification and sulfate reducing could reach 90 and 89%, respectively. Seventy-six percent of sulfate was transformed into element sulfur. Nitrate significantly had a negative effect on sulfate reduction above 10 mM. As 20 mM nitrate, the sulfate reducing percentage would drop to 67%. These results showed that the anaerobic-anoxic process was feasible for the treatment of flue gas washing wastewater. It would be prospectively applied to other wastewater with the higher ratio of SO42−/NO3−.

2020 ◽  
Vol 103 ◽  
pp. 103192
Author(s):  
Young Cheol Park ◽  
Sung-Ho Jo ◽  
Jae-Young Kim ◽  
Yooseob Won ◽  
Hyungseok Nam ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Anton Petukhov ◽  
Artem Atlaskin ◽  
Maria Sergeeva ◽  
Sergey Kryuchkov ◽  
Dmitry Shablykin ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (17) ◽  
pp. 16926-16940 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniya M. Thomas ◽  
Jerry Mechery ◽  
Sylas V. Paulose

2011 ◽  
Vol 347-353 ◽  
pp. 1479-1482 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pu Peng ◽  
Yi Zhuang

The CO2 capturing technologies as applied to FCC flue gas in order to reduce GHG (green house gases) were evaluated and compared in this review. Although the CCS (carbon capture and storage) idea has been proposed for more than 30 years, there has been little commercial success of CCS projects. The largest issue is where to store the massive amount of captured pure CO2 every year. Therefore, the review will focus on the efficient use of power or heat to reduce CO2 emission and how to recycle the use of produced CO2 before it is emitted to the atmosphere rather than being captured and stored. The scenarios with oxyfiring, microalgae-cofiring or biogas burning to treat FCC flue gas are introduced and discussed.


2009 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1235-1239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Young Cheol Park ◽  
Sung-Ho Jo ◽  
Chong Kul Ryu ◽  
Chang-Keun Yi

2014 ◽  
Vol 465 ◽  
pp. 49-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lu Liu ◽  
Edgar S. Sanders ◽  
Sudhir S. Kulkarni ◽  
David J. Hasse ◽  
William J. Koros

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document