scholarly journals Risk Assessment in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Patients: The Long and Short of it

2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 125-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raymond L. Benza ◽  
Lisa Carey Lohmueller ◽  
Jidapa Kraisangka ◽  
Manreet Kanwar

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a chronic and rapidly progressive disease that is characterized by extensive narrowing of the pulmonary vasculature, leading to increases in pulmonary vascular resistance, subsequent right ventricular dysfunction, and eventual death. There are currently multiple approved drugs—developed as single or combination therapies in the last few years—that have improved outcome and functionality in PAH. However, despite improvement in short-term survival with these new effective therapies, PAH remains an incurable disease with a median survival of 7 years (Figure 1).1 This chronic disease state may be characterized by morbid events such as hospitalizations that herald rapid disease progression and account for a significant disease burden (Figure 2).23 Physician ability to predict PAH disease progression is critical for determining optimal care of patients. Accurate risk assessment allows clinicians to determine the patient's prognosis, identify treatment goals, and monitor disease progression and the patient's response to treatment. Risk assessment for PAH patients should include a range of clinical, hemodynamic, and exercise parameters, performed in a serial fashion over the treatment course. Patient risk stratification can also help physicians better allocate treatment resources in settings where they are scarce. If widely adopted, risk prediction can enhance the consistency of treatment approaches across PAH practitioners and improve the timeliness of referral for lung transplantation. Hence, along with advancing PAH treatment options, comprehensive risk prediction is essential to make individualized treatment decisions in the current treatment era. Several tools are currently available for assessing risk in PAH (Figure 3). These include the 2015 European Society of Cardiology/European Respiratory Society pulmonary hypertension guidelines' risk variables,4 the French registry equation,5 the National Institutes of Health risk equation,6 or a risk score such as the one derived from the Registry to Evaluate Early And Long-term PAH Disease Management.1 These registries and evaluations of clinical trial sets have provided important insights into the importance of both modifiable (eg, 6-minute walk distance, functional class, brain natriuretic peptide, and nonmodifiable (eg, age, gender, PAH etiology) risk factors that predict survival. The following review explores commonly cited risk factors, both modifiable and nonmodifiable, and their implications for patient outcomes.

2021 ◽  
pp. 00378-2021
Author(s):  
Catherine E. Simpson ◽  
Megan Griffiths ◽  
Jun Yang ◽  
Melanie K. Nies ◽  
R. Dhananjay Vaidya ◽  
...  

Currently available noninvasive markers for assessing disease severity and mortality risk in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) are unrelated to fundamental disease biology. Endostatin, an angiostatic peptide known to inhibit pulmonary artery endothelial cell migration, proliferation, and survival in vitro, has been linked to adverse hemodynamics and shortened survival in small PAH cohorts. This observational cohort study sought to assess 1) the prognostic performance of circulating endostatin levels in a large, multicenter PAH cohort, and 2) the added value gained by incorporating endostatin into existing PAH risk prediction models.Endostatin ELISAs were performed on enrollment samples collected from 2017 PAH subjects with detailed clinical data, including survival times. Endostatin associations with clinical variables, including survival, were examined using multivariable regression and Cox proportional hazards models. Extended survival models including endostatin were compared to null models based on the REVEAL risk prediction tool and ESC/ERS low risk criteria using likelihood ratio tests, Akaike and Bayesian information criteria, and C-statistics.Higher endostatin was associated with higher right atrial pressure, mean pulmonary arterial pressure, and pulmonary vascular resistance and with shorter six-minute walk distance (p<0.01). Mortality risk doubled for each log-higher endostatin (hazard ratio 2.3, 95% confidence interval 1.6 to 3.4, p<0.001). Endostatin remained an independent predictor of survival when incorporated into existing risk prediction models. Adding endostatin to REVEAL-based and ESC/ERS criteria-based risk assessment strategies improved mortality risk prediction.Endostatin is a robust, independent predictor of mortality in PAH. Adding endostatin to existing PAH risk prediction strategies improves PAH risk assessment.


2007 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 66-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dana McGlothlin ◽  
Teresa De Marco

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a disease of the pulmonary vasculature that is characterized by a progressive increase in pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) and pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) resulting in the development of right ventricular (RV) failure, inadequate oxygenation, and ultimately death. Anesthesia and surgery, both cardiac and noncardiac, are associated with significantly increased morbidity and mortality in patients with PAH due mainly to RV failure, arrhythmias, postoperative hypoxemia, and myocardial ischemia. Preoperative risk assessment and successful management of patients with PAH undergoing general surgery involves an understanding of the pathophysiology of the disease, analysis of preoperative and operative risk factors, intraoperative management, and early recognition and treatment of postoperative complications.


2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 47-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica B. Badlam ◽  
Todd M. Bull

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a chronic disease that results in narrowing of the small pre-capillary pulmonary arteries leading to elevation of pulmonary artery pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance, subsequent right ventricular failure, and if unchecked, death. Advances in the treatment of PAH over the last two decades have markedly improved survival. These improvements reflect a combination of changes in treatments, improved patient care strategies, and varying disease phenotypes in the PAH population. Currently approved therapies for PAH are directed at the recognized abnormalities within the pulmonary vasculature and include endothelin receptor antagonists, phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors, soluble guanylate cyclase stimulators, and prostacyclin pathway agents. Most of these drugs have been approved on the basis of short-term trials that mainly demonstrated improvements in exercise capacity. More recently, long-term, event-driven trials of novel drugs have been performed, demonstrating new efficacy parameters. There have also been exciting advances in the understanding of right heart failure pathophysiology in PAH that have the potential to inspire the development of right ventricular targeted therapy and continued discoveries in the heterogeneity of disease and response to treatment has great potential for developing more ‘personalized’ therapeutic options. In this article, we review the current available data regarding the management of PAH, with an emphasis on the pharmacologic therapies and discussion of novel therapeutic directions for the treatment of this fatal disease.


2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (142) ◽  
pp. 390-398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amresh Raina ◽  
Marc Humbert

Regular patient assessment is essential for the management of chronic diseases, such as pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Comprehensive patient assessment and risk stratification in PAH are important to guide treatment decisions and to monitor disease progression as well as patients' response to treatment. Approaches for assessing risk in PAH patients include the use of risk variables, as recommended in the 2015 European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Respiratory Society (ERS) pulmonary hypertension (PH) guidelines, and the application of risk equations and scores, such as the French registry risk equation and the REVEAL registry risk score. Risk stratification and risk scores are both useful predictors of survival on a population basis, and provide an estimate for individual patients' risk. The 2015 ESC/ERS PH guidelines recommend regular assessment of multiple variables at an expert centre. The respective merits and limitations of different risk assessment methods in PAH are discussed in this article, as well as some considerations that can be taken into account in the future development of risk assessment tools.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
HA Ghofrani ◽  
O Sitbon ◽  
K Chin ◽  
R Channick ◽  
L Di Scala ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document