scholarly journals Risk assessment in pulmonary arterial hypertension

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (142) ◽  
pp. 390-398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amresh Raina ◽  
Marc Humbert

Regular patient assessment is essential for the management of chronic diseases, such as pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Comprehensive patient assessment and risk stratification in PAH are important to guide treatment decisions and to monitor disease progression as well as patients' response to treatment. Approaches for assessing risk in PAH patients include the use of risk variables, as recommended in the 2015 European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Respiratory Society (ERS) pulmonary hypertension (PH) guidelines, and the application of risk equations and scores, such as the French registry risk equation and the REVEAL registry risk score. Risk stratification and risk scores are both useful predictors of survival on a population basis, and provide an estimate for individual patients' risk. The 2015 ESC/ERS PH guidelines recommend regular assessment of multiple variables at an expert centre. The respective merits and limitations of different risk assessment methods in PAH are discussed in this article, as well as some considerations that can be taken into account in the future development of risk assessment tools.

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (11) ◽  
pp. e0241504
Author(s):  
Sandeep Sahay ◽  
Adriano R. Tonelli ◽  
Mona Selej ◽  
Zachary Watson ◽  
Raymond L. Benza

Background Accurate and regular risk assessment is important for evaluation and treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) patients, including those with functional class (FC) II symptoms, a population considered at low risk for disease progression. Risk assessment methods include subjective and objective evaluations. Multiparametric assessments include tools based on the European Society of Cardiology/European Respiratory Society (ESC/ERS) guidelines (COMPERA and FPHR methods, respectively) and the Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-Term PAH Disease Management (REVEAL; REVEAL 2.0 tool). To better understand risk status determination in FC II patients, we compared physician-reported risk assessments with objective multiparameter assessment tools. Methods This retrospective chart analysis included PAH patients with FC II symptoms receiving monotherapy or dual therapy. Physicians were surveyed (via telephone) to obtain an assessment of patient risk using their typical methodology, which might have been informed by objective risk assessment. Patient risk was then calculated independently using COMPERA, FPHR and REVEAL 2.0 tools. Factors associated with incongruent risk assessment were identified. Results Of the 153 patients, 41%, 46%, and 13% were classified as low, intermediate, and high risk, respectively, by physicians. Concordance between physician gestalt and objective methods ranged from 43%–54%. Among patients considered as low risk by physician gestalt, 4%–28% were categorized as high risk using objective methods. The most common physician factor associated with incongruent risk assessment was less frequent echocardiography during follow-up (every 7–12 months vs. every 3 months; p = 0.01). Conclusions More than half of FC II PAH patients were classified as intermediate/high risk using objective multiparameter assessments. Incorporating objective risk-assessment algorithms into clinical practice may better inform risk assessment and treatment strategies.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Su-Gang Gong ◽  
Chao Li ◽  
Qin-Hua Zhao ◽  
Rong Jiang ◽  
Wen-Hui Wu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: The 2015 European pulmonary hypertension guidelines recommend a risk stratification strategy for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). We aimed to investigate the validation and potential prognostic information in our patients.Methods: The risk assessment variables proposed by the PH guidelines was performed, using World Health Organization function class, 6-min walking distance, brain natriuretic peptide or its N-terminal fragment, right arterial pressure, cardiac index, mixed venous saturation, right atrium area, pericardial effusion, peak oxygen consumption and ventilatory equivalents for carbon dioxide. An abbreviated version also was applied.Results: The 392 patients were enrolled between 2009 and 2018. After a median interval of 13 months, re-evaluation assessments were available for 386 subjects. The PH guidelines risk tool may effectively discriminate three risk group and mortality (p< 0.001) both at baseline and re-evaluation. Meanwhile, its simplified risk version was valid for baseline and accurately predicted the risk of death in all risk group (p< 0.001). At the time of re-evaluation, the percentage of low risk group has an increase, but a greater proportion achieved high risk group and a lesser proportion maintained in intermediate risk group.Conclusions: The 2015 European PH guidelines and its simplified version risk stratification assessment present effective discrimination of different risk groups and accurate mortality estimates in patients with IPAH. Changes of risk proportion at re-evaluation implicated that natural treatment decisions may not be consistently with goal-oriented treatment strategy.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 204589402091009
Author(s):  
Sandeep Sahay ◽  
Franck Rahaghi

Pulmonary arterial hypertension is a progressive disease that can lead to right-sided ventricular failure and premature death. Tailoring therapy to individual patient’s needs, along with regular risk assessment, is integral for optimal outcomes in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Results from the AMBITION trial support the use of upfront combination of tadalafil and ambrisentan. In a recent analysis of risk assessment in pulmonary arterial hypertension, abridged versions of the REVEAL 2.0 risk score were shown to be comparable to the full tools. In this report, we present a case series of the use of riociguat in upfront combination or sequentially, and the impact on risk scores as determined by the abridged REVEAL Lite 2.0 approach.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 204589402095018
Author(s):  
Melisa Wilson ◽  
Jennifer Keeley ◽  
Martha Kingman ◽  
Jiajing Wang ◽  
Fran Rogers

Practice guidelines suggest that treatment decisions in pulmonary arterial hypertension be informed by periodic assessment of patients’ clinical risk. Several tools, well validated for risk discrimination, such as the Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-term Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Disease Management calculator, were developed to assess pulmonary arterial hypertension patients’ risk of death based on multiple parameters, including functional class, hemodynamics, biomarkers, comorbidities, and exercise capacity. Using an online survey, we investigated the use of risk assessment tools by pulmonary hypertension healthcare providers in the United States. Of 121 survey respondents who make treatment decisions, 59% reported using risk assessment tools. The use of these tools was lower for non-physicians (48% vs. 65% physicians) and for practitioners at centers with 1 to 100 pulmonary arterial hypertension patients compared with centers with >100 patients (47% vs. 64%). Risk was most frequently assessed by decision makers at the time of diagnosis (cited by 54%) and at the time of worsening symptoms (cited by 42%), suggesting that use of pulmonary arterial hypertension risk assessment tools remains low. In our survey, non-physicians compared with physicians cited two major barriers to increased tool use: lack of education and training (20% vs. 4%) and lack of clarity on the best tool to use (30% vs. 18%). Information technology tools, such as electronic medical record integration and web or phone-based risk calculating applications, were cited most frequently as ways to increase the use of risk assessment tools.


2020 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 2000008
Author(s):  
Manreet K. Kanwar ◽  
Mardi Gomberg-Maitland ◽  
Marius Hoeper ◽  
Christine Pausch ◽  
David Pittrow ◽  
...  

BackgroundCurrent risk stratification tools in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) are limited in their discriminatory abilities, partly due to the assumption that prognostic clinical variables have an independent and linear relationship to clinical outcomes. We sought to demonstrate the utility of Bayesian network-based machine learning in enhancing the predictive ability of an existing state-of-the-art risk stratification tool, REVEAL 2.0.MethodsWe derived a tree-augmented naïve Bayes model (titled PHORA) to predict 1-year survival in PAH patients included in the REVEAL registry, using the same variables and cut-points found in REVEAL 2.0. PHORA models were validated internally (within the REVEAL registry) and externally (in the COMPERA and PHSANZ registries). Patients were classified as low-, intermediate- and high-risk (<5%, 5–20% and >10% 12-month mortality, respectively) based on the 2015 European Society of Cardiology/European Respiratory Society guidelines.ResultsPHORA had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.80 for predicting 1-year survival, which was an improvement over REVEAL 2.0 (AUC 0.76). When validated in the COMPERA and PHSANZ registries, PHORA demonstrated an AUC of 0.74 and 0.80, respectively. 1-year survival rates predicted by PHORA were greater for patients with lower risk scores and poorer for those with higher risk scores (p<0.001), with excellent separation between low-, intermediate- and high-risk groups in all three registries.ConclusionOur Bayesian network-derived risk prediction model, PHORA, demonstrated an improvement in discrimination over existing models. This is reflective of the ability of Bayesian network-based models to account for the interrelationships between clinical variables on outcome, and tolerance to missing data elements when calculating predictions.


2018 ◽  
Vol 51 (5) ◽  
pp. 1702310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clara Hjalmarsson ◽  
Göran Rådegran ◽  
David Kylhammar ◽  
Bengt Rundqvist ◽  
Jonas Multing ◽  
...  

Recent reports from worldwide pulmonary hypertension registries show a new demographic picture for patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH), with an increasing prevalence among the elderly.We aimed to investigate the effects of age and comorbidity on risk stratification and outcome of patients with incident IPAH.The study population (n=264) was categorised into four age groups: 18–45, 46–64, 65–74 and ≥75 years. Individual risk profiles were determined according to a risk assessment instrument, based on the European Society of Cardiology and the European Respiratory Society guidelines. The change in risk group from baseline to follow-up (median 5 months) and survival were compared across age groups. In the two youngest age groups, a significant number of patients improved (18–45 years, Z= −4.613, p<0.001; 46–64 years, Z= −2.125, p=0.034), but no significant improvement was found in the older patient groups. 5-year survival was highest in patients aged 18–45 years (88%), while the survival rates were 63%, 56% and 36% for patients in the groups 46–64, 65–74 and ≥75 years, respectively (p<0.001). Ischaemic heart disease and kidney dysfunction independently predicted survival.These findings highlight the importance of age and specific comorbidities as prognostic markers of outcome in addition to established risk assessment algorithms.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Su-Gang Gong ◽  
Wen-Hui Wu ◽  
Chao Li ◽  
Qin-Hua Zhao ◽  
Rong Jiang ◽  
...  

Background: The 2015 European pulmonary hypertension (PH) guidelines recommend a risk stratification strategy for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). We aimed to investigate the validation and potential prognostic information in Chinese patients.Methods: The risk assessment variables proposed by the PH guidelines were performed by using the WHO function class, 6-min walking distance, brain natriuretic peptide or its N-terminal fragment, right arterial pressure, cardiac index, mixed venous saturation, right atrium area, pericardial effusion, peak oxygen consumption, and ventilatory equivalents for carbon dioxide. An abbreviated version also was applied.Results: A total of 392 patients with idiopathic PAH (IPAH) were enrolled between 2009 and 2018. After a median interval of 13 months, re-evaluation assessments were available for 386 subjects. The PAH guidelines risk tool may effectively discriminate three risk groups and mortality (p &lt; 0.001) both at the baseline and re-evaluation. Meanwhile, its simplified risk version was valid for baseline and accurately predicted the risk of death in all the risk groups (p &lt; 0.001). At the time of re-evaluation, the percentage of low-risk group has an increase, but a greater proportion achieved the high-risk group and a lesser proportion maintained in the intermediate-risk group.Conclusion: The 2015 European PH guidelines and its simplified version risk stratification assessment present an effective discrimination of different risk groups and accurate mortality estimates in Chinese patients with IPAH. Changes of risk proportion at re-evaluation implicated that natural treatment decisions may not be consistently with goal-oriented treatment strategy.


2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 125-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raymond L. Benza ◽  
Lisa Carey Lohmueller ◽  
Jidapa Kraisangka ◽  
Manreet Kanwar

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a chronic and rapidly progressive disease that is characterized by extensive narrowing of the pulmonary vasculature, leading to increases in pulmonary vascular resistance, subsequent right ventricular dysfunction, and eventual death. There are currently multiple approved drugs—developed as single or combination therapies in the last few years—that have improved outcome and functionality in PAH. However, despite improvement in short-term survival with these new effective therapies, PAH remains an incurable disease with a median survival of 7 years (Figure 1).1 This chronic disease state may be characterized by morbid events such as hospitalizations that herald rapid disease progression and account for a significant disease burden (Figure 2).23 Physician ability to predict PAH disease progression is critical for determining optimal care of patients. Accurate risk assessment allows clinicians to determine the patient's prognosis, identify treatment goals, and monitor disease progression and the patient's response to treatment. Risk assessment for PAH patients should include a range of clinical, hemodynamic, and exercise parameters, performed in a serial fashion over the treatment course. Patient risk stratification can also help physicians better allocate treatment resources in settings where they are scarce. If widely adopted, risk prediction can enhance the consistency of treatment approaches across PAH practitioners and improve the timeliness of referral for lung transplantation. Hence, along with advancing PAH treatment options, comprehensive risk prediction is essential to make individualized treatment decisions in the current treatment era. Several tools are currently available for assessing risk in PAH (Figure 3). These include the 2015 European Society of Cardiology/European Respiratory Society pulmonary hypertension guidelines' risk variables,4 the French registry equation,5 the National Institutes of Health risk equation,6 or a risk score such as the one derived from the Registry to Evaluate Early And Long-term PAH Disease Management.1 These registries and evaluations of clinical trial sets have provided important insights into the importance of both modifiable (eg, 6-minute walk distance, functional class, brain natriuretic peptide, and nonmodifiable (eg, age, gender, PAH etiology) risk factors that predict survival. The following review explores commonly cited risk factors, both modifiable and nonmodifiable, and their implications for patient outcomes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document