scholarly journals Deep Vadose Zone Treatability Test for the Hanford Central Plateau: Soil Desiccation Pilot Test Results

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Truex ◽  
Martinus Oostrom ◽  
Christopher E. Strickland ◽  
Timothy C. Johnson ◽  
Vicky L. Freedman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Vadose Zone ◽  
Pilot Test ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Central Plateau ◽  
Soil Desiccation

scholarly journals Deep Vadose Zone Treatability Test of Soil Desiccation for the Hanford Central Plateau: Final Report

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Truex ◽  
Glen B. Chronister ◽  
Christopher E. Strickland ◽  
Christian D. Johnson ◽  
Guzel D. Tartakovsky ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Vadose Zone ◽  
Final Report ◽  
Central Plateau ◽  
Soil Desiccation

VERTAD™, AUTO-THERMOPHILIC AEROBIC DIGESTION: PILOT TEST RESULTS

2001 ◽  
Vol 2001 (1) ◽  
pp. 1307-1322
Author(s):  
Mike Boyle ◽  
Larry Sasser ◽  
Jeff Guild ◽  
Dave Pollack
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Test ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Aerobic Digestion ◽  
Thermophilic Aerobic Digestion

scholarly journals Pilot test results of post-combustion CO2 capture using solid sorbents

2011 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 1584-1592 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharon Sjostrom ◽  
Holly Krutka ◽  
Travis Starns ◽  
Tom Campbell
Keyword(s):  
Co2 Capture ◽  
Pilot Test ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Solid Sorbents

Fiber optic sensor for continuous monitoring of chlorinated solvents in the vadose zone and in groundwater: field test results

1992 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul F. Daley ◽  
Bill W. Colston, Jr. ◽  
Steve B. Brown ◽  
Kevin C. Langry ◽  
Fred P. Milanovich
Keyword(s):  
Field Test ◽  
Vadose Zone ◽  
Continuous Monitoring ◽  
Fiber Optic ◽  
Chlorinated Solvents ◽  
Fiber Optic Sensor ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Optic Sensor

Pressure Testing of New 8” Pipeline Lateral With Air

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. K. Botros ◽  
J. Geerligs ◽  
A. Glover ◽  
G. Nahas
Keyword(s):  
Air Temperature ◽  
Small Volume ◽  
Small Diameter ◽  
Area Ratio ◽  
Test Facility ◽  
Pilot Test ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Pressure Testing ◽  
Upper Limit ◽  
Simulated Test

A procedure for pressure testing of small diameter pipelines (up to NPS 12) using air has been developed based on pilot test results conducted on a controlled simulated test section of a small volume = 18.5 m3. This paper describes the simulated test facility and presents results of five simulated tests with different size pinhole leaks. A model describing leaks and effects of variation in air temperature has been developed, and together with the test results, a criteria for the upper limit of pipe volume to leak area ratio for implementation of air testing for various pipe sizes, has been arrived at. The procedure was then developed and utilized on a project approved by the Alberta Energy Utility Board. Results of this test on a new 12.2 km NPS 8 pipeline lateral in Alberta are also presented.

Submerged Production System—A Final Report

1980 ◽  
Vol 102 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-34
Author(s):  
J. A. Burkhardt ◽  
T. W. Childers ◽  
R. E. Anderson ◽  
W. D. Loth ◽  
T. W. Michie
Keyword(s):  
Deep Water ◽  
Production System ◽  
Commercial Application ◽  
Final Report ◽  
Pilot Test ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Well Completion ◽  
Adequate Quality ◽  
Equipment Manufacture ◽  
Processing And Storage

The offshore pilot test of Exxon’s Submerged Production System (SPS) has reached a successful conclusion. This pilot test encompassed the entire spectrum of SPS equipment, spanning from the well completion intervals to, but not including, common surface processing and storage facilities. Since the SPS is designed to meet all the life cycle needs of a subsea field, one of the objectives of the pilot test was to evaluate both the techniques and the equipment used to install, operate, and maintain a prototype version of the SPS. The equipment under test was designed for use in water depths up to 2000 ft, but with minor modifications it is capable of operating in significantly greater depths. Evaluation of pilot test results has shown that the deep water installation techniques are practicable and that the deep water maintenance machinery is competent to repair any failures likely to occur in an operating system. One of the most significant problems in conducting the pilot test was achieving adequate quality control during equipment manufacture. The test results have demonstrated that, with relatively minor modifications, the SPS is suitable for commercial application.

Pilot Test Results for 500 MLD Tertiary Nitrification MBR in Hamilton, Ontario

2007 ◽  
Vol 2007 (9) ◽  
pp. 8488-8498
Author(s):  
Tim A. Constantine ◽  
Dan Chauvin ◽  
Mark Bainbridge ◽  
George Crawford ◽  
Glen Daigger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Test ◽  
Test Results

A Method To Account for Afterflow at the Pulsing Well During Pulse Tests

1983 ◽  
Vol 23 (03) ◽  
pp. 519-520
Author(s):  
Hubert Winston
Keyword(s):  
Computer Simulations ◽  
Flow Rate ◽  
Storage Capacity ◽  
Pulse Length ◽  
Test Area ◽  
Pilot Test ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Pulse Test ◽  
Wellbore Storage ◽  
And Storage

Abstract The nature of wellbore storage is such that afterflow during a pulse test can affect the reservoir pressure performance and can lead to the calculation of erroneous performance and can lead to the calculation of erroneous values for formation transmissibility and storage. This is most likely to occur when the wells of interest are close together or when after flow persists for a long time relative to the pulse length. This article describes a technique that was developed to account for the effects of after flow at the pulsing well during pulse testing of a small production pilot. The technique is not general because it requires that a computer-generated simulation of each pulse test be made. An application of the method is given. Introduction In carrying out a pulse test, we introduce a pressure disturbance into a reservoir by alternately increasing and decreasing the flow rate at the pulsing well in a known manner. The pressure at the responding well is monitored, and, if the wells are in pressure communication, the pressure distrubance eventually will affect the pressure at the responding well. Since the form and the duration of the flow, rate disturbance are known, and since the mathematics that describe the pressure behavior of fluid-beefing reservoirs are well understood, the pulse test pressure response can be predicted. Several methods are available to calculate values for formation transmissibility and storage within a pulse-tested reservoir. Although all real reservoirs are heterogeneous, the models for deriving these techniques assume that the reservoir is ideal. When the wells of interest are far apart or when the duration of after flow is short relative to the pulse length, the effects of wellbore storage on the pulse test results will be slight. If, on the other hand, the pulsing well and the responding well are close together or if after flow persists for a tong time, the effects of wellbore storage on the pulse test results may be substantial. The work described here began during the analysis phase of a series of pulse tests that were run in a small phase of a series of pulse tests that were run in a small pilot test area. Computer simulations of the tests showed pilot test area. Computer simulations of the tests showed that the method of Mondragon and Menzie would not compensate adequately for the strong effects of after flow on test results. Description of the Method Since a series of injection/falloff tests had been run in the pilot area, it was possible to obtain values for the ratio of formation transmissibility to the wellbore storage capacity, /F, at each well by type-curve matching techniques. Using this parameter, we can determine the after flow vs. time profiles that would occur during the pulsing-well shut-in periods and incorporate them into a computer simulation of each pulse test. A typical pulsing well-flow profile showing after flow during the shut-in period is profile showing after flow during the shut-in period is illustrated in Fig. 1. Given that the pulsing wells were observed to go on vacuum soon after shut-in and given that the wellbore storage capacity for these wells during the on-vacuum condition should be approximately two orders of magnitude larger than it would be during injection SPEJ p. 519

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document