scholarly journals Tests of neutrino interaction models with the MicroBooNE detector

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleena Rafique
Keyword(s):  
Neutrino Interaction ◽  
Interaction Models

scholarly journals Adjusting neutrino interaction models and evaluating uncertainties using NOvA near detector data

2020 ◽  
Vol 80 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
M. A. Acero ◽  
P. Adamson ◽  
G. Agam ◽  
L. Aliaga ◽  
T. Alion ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cross Sections ◽  
Neutrino Interaction ◽  
Neutrino Beam ◽  
Order Effects ◽  
Interaction Models ◽  
Near Detector ◽  
Neutrino Oscillation Experiment ◽  
Systematic Uncertainties ◽  
Interaction Cross Sections ◽  
Detector Design

AbstractThe two-detector design of the NOvA neutrino oscillation experiment, in which two functionally identical detectors are exposed to an intense neutrino beam, aids in canceling leading order effects of cross-section uncertainties. However, limited knowledge of neutrino interaction cross sections still gives rise to some of the largest systematic uncertainties in current oscillation measurements. We show contemporary models of neutrino interactions to be discrepant with data from NOvA, consistent with discrepancies seen in other experiments. Adjustments to neutrino interaction models in GENIE are presented, creating an effective model that improves agreement with our data. We also describe systematic uncertainties on these models, including uncertainties on multi-nucleon interactions from a newly developed procedure using NOvA near detector data.

scholarly journals Recent highlights from GENIE v3

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luis Alvarez-Ruso ◽  
Costas Andreopoulos ◽  
Adi Ashkenazi ◽  
Christopher Barry ◽  
Steve Dennis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Model Simulation ◽  
Global Analysis ◽  
New Physics ◽  
Scattering Data ◽  
Neutrino Interaction ◽  
Beyond The Standard Model ◽  
Neutrino Scattering ◽  
Interaction Models ◽  
History Of ◽  
Core Framework

AbstractThe release of GENIE v3.0.0 was a major milestone in the long history of the GENIE project, delivering several alternative comprehensive neutrino interaction models, improved charged-lepton scattering simulations, a range of beyond the Standard Model simulation capabilities, improved experimental interfaces, expanded core framework capabilities, and advanced new frameworks for the global analysis of neutrino scattering data and tuning of neutrino interaction models. Steady progress continued following the release of GENIE v3.0.0. New tools and a large number of new physics models, comprehensive model configurations, and tunes have been made publicly available and planned for release in v3.2.0. This article highlights some of the most recent technical and physics developments in the GENIE v3 series.

Linguistic Interactions: A Therapeutic Consideration for Adults With Aphasia

2008 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 93-98
Author(s):  
Lynn E. Fox
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Social Contexts ◽  
Interaction Models ◽  
Social Communities ◽  
Wernicke's Aphasia ◽  
Communication Challenges ◽  
Therapeutic Consideration ◽  
Patterns Of Interaction ◽  
Structural Language

Abstract Linguistic interaction models suggest that interrelationships arise between structural language components and between structural and pragmatic components when language is used in social contexts. The linguist, David Crystal (1986, 1987), has proposed that these relationships are central, not peripheral, to achieving desired clinical outcomes. For individuals with severe communication challenges, erratic or unpredictable relationships between structural and pragmatic components can result in atypical patterns of interaction between them and members of their social communities, which may create a perception of disablement. This paper presents a case study of a woman with fluent, Wernicke's aphasia that illustrates how attention to patterns of linguistic interaction may enhance AAC intervention for adults with aphasia.

The Intertwined Histories of Personality and Social Psychology

2018 ◽  
pp. 10-34
Author(s):  
Thomas F. Pettigrew
Keyword(s):  
Social Psychology ◽  
World War I ◽  
Bounded Rationality ◽  
World War ◽  
Structural Differentiation ◽  
Interaction Models

Personality and social psychology histories have been closely intertwined for more than a century. Several critical differences have at times acted to separate the fields. One such divergence involved their models of humans—whether largely irrational (personality emphasis) or largely rational (social emphasis). This difference has subsided with their joint acceptance of a “bounded rationality.” More important has been their difference in focus—the microlevel of the person versus the mesolevel of the group and situation. Now, both fields largely agree on a variety of interaction models that include both the person and the situation. We trace these tensions between the two fields across eras: (a) origins through World War I (1890–1919); (b) early developments (1920–1935); (c) war influences (1936–1950); (d) structural differentiation and slow acceptance (1951–1965); (e) dual crises (1966–1985); (f) coming back together again (1986–2000); and (7) continued fusion (2001–present).

Comparison of Results of Analyses the Foundation Slab Calculated by Two FEM Programs

2014 ◽  
Vol 1065-1069 ◽  
pp. 1052-1056
Author(s):  
Radim Čajka ◽  
Jana Vaskova
Keyword(s):  
Contact Stress ◽  
Bending Moments ◽  
Foundation Slab ◽  
Interaction Models ◽  
Comparison Of Results

For decades attention has been paid to interaction of foundation structures and subsoil and development of interaction models. Currently there are several software that, can deal with the interaction of foundations and subsoil. The purpose of this paper is to compare resulting deformation of the slab, subsidence of the subsoil, bending moments and contact stress calculated by two different software based on FEM calculations. Calculated deformation of the slab is compared with deformation measured during experiment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document