Main Creditor Bank and Accounting Comparability

2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 149-174
Author(s):  
Eung - Gil Kim
2015 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 23-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yun Xu ◽  
Chuan Luo ◽  
Dongyu Chen ◽  
Haichao Zheng

Online Peer-to-Peer (P2P) lending marketplaces allow individuals to lend and borrow directly among each other without the mediation of a creditor bank institution. Prior literature has examined online P2P, but has largely been limited to the Western context. This paper thus explores how social capital and other factors influences online P2P lending in the U.S. and China. Based on the archival data of Prosper and PPDai, we compare market outcome of two online P2P lending marketplaces in the U.S. and China. The empirical results show that social capital is not equally important in different online communities. Social capital seems to be more influential for likelihood of getting funded in China than in the U.S. In contrast, social capital has influence on interest rate in the U.S. only. The authors' study thus extends current understanding about how social capital influences online communities to a global perspective.


2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-102
Author(s):  
Basri Efendi ◽  
Chadijah Rizki Lestari

Berdasarkan ketentuan Pasal 44 ayat (1) Peraturan Menteri Keuangan No. 27/PMK.06/2016 tentang Petunjuk Pelaksanaan Lelang (PMKN 27/2016) diketahui bahwa bank kreditur menetapkan nilai limit berdasarkan penilaian penilai atau penaksiran penaksir. Pasal 45 PMKN 27/2016 menentukan, penetapan nilai limit berdasarkan penilaian oleh penilai dilakukan apabila nilai limit objek hak tanggungan paling sedikit Rp. 1.000.000.000 (satu miliar rupiah) atau apabila bank kreditur akan ikut sebagai peserta pada lelang tersebut. Terhadap nilai limit objek hak tanggungan yang nilai limitnya berada di bawah Rp. 1.000.000.000 nilai limit akan ditetapkan bank kreditur berdasarkan penaksiran penaksir. Penaksir ini merupakan pihak yang berasal dari pihak bank kreditur, yang melakukan penaksiran berdasarkan metode yang dapat dipertanggungjawabkan oleh bank kreditur, termasuk kurator untuk benda seni dan benda atik atau kuno. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normative bersifat eksplanatoris, yang akan dianalisis dengan pendekatan kualitatif. Perlu dilakukan evaluasi dan deregulasi terkait penetapan nilai limit yang dilakukan berdasarkan penaksiran penaksir. Determining the Limit Value by the Seller Based on the Implementation of the Minister of Finance Based on the provisions of Article 44 Paragraph (1) of Regulation of the Minister of Finance Number 27 / PMK.06 / 2016 concerning the Auction Directive (PMKN 27/2016) it is known that the creditor bank determines the limit value based on the assessor assessment or appraisal assessment. In the subsequent provision that Article 45 of PMKN 27/2016 is known that the determination of the limit value based on the assessment by the assessor is made if the limit value of the object of mortgage right is at least Rp.1.000.000.000 (one billion rupiah) or if the creditor bank will participate as a participant in the auction. Whereas to the limit value of the mortgage object whose the limit value is below Rp.1.000.000.000 (one billion rupiah) it will be determined by the creditor bank based on the appraisal of the appraiser. This estimator is a party that comes from the bank, which conducts an assessment based on methods that can be justified by the creditor bank, including the curator for art objects and ancient objects. This research used a normative juridical approach that is explanatory, which will be analyzed with qualitative approach. It is important to evaluate and deregulate the determination of the limit  value based on the assessment of the estimator.


2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 82-98
Author(s):  
Bingyi Chen ◽  
Ahmet C. Kurt ◽  
Irene Guannan Wang

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 73
Author(s):  
Wil Martens ◽  
Prem W. S. Yapa ◽  
Maryam Safari

This paper examined whether financial statement comparability constrains opportunistic earnings management in frontier market countries. Using a large sample of 19 frontier market countries, and an accounting comparability method that maps comparability across several accounting standards, the results show that enhanced financial comparability constrains accruals earnings management (AEM). Contrary to developed markets and novel to this study, a significant relationship between financial comparability and real earnings management (REM) was not found. For greater robustness, AEM and REM were also tested on both International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) adopting and non-adopting countries. The results suggest IFRS adoption constrains AEM, yet exhibited no impact on constraining REM. Additionally, the use of BigN auditors failed to conclusively show an ability to moderate EM. When combined, the results suggest that frontier markets engage in less REM than expected. It is also noted that the legal roots (civil vs. common law) play a significant role in constraining earnings management. Common law countries exhibited lower AEM when comparability increased; this significance was not found in countries that were rooted in civil law. Contributions from this study show that findings from developed markets cannot be generalised to frontier markets.


2019 ◽  
Vol 95 (4) ◽  
pp. 127-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin Chircop ◽  
Daniel W. Collins ◽  
Lars Helge Hass ◽  
Nhat (Nate) Q. Nguyen

ABSTRACT We predict that a firm's greater accounting comparability with its industry peers facilitates its learning from those peer firms' research and development (R&D) investments, allowing that firm to have greater innovative efficiency. We estimate accounting comparability using pro forma capitalized R&D earnings that link lagged R&D expenditures to future profitability employing the Almon (1965) distributed lag model. We find that greater accounting comparability leads to enhanced ability to predict future cash flows generated by R&D investments of peer firms. In the cross-section, we observe that the relation between accounting comparability and innovative efficiency is stronger if peer firms exhibit higher accounting (accrual) quality and are themselves successful innovators. In sum, this study shows that a shared qualitative characteristic of accounting, namely, accounting comparability, is positively associated with innovative efficiency. JEL Classifications: G12; G14; O32.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document