scholarly journals Effect of Disease Causing Missense Mutations on Intrinsically Disordered Regions in Proteins

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suryanarayana Seera ◽  
Hampapathalu A. Nagarajaram
Keyword(s):  
Intrinsically Disordered Proteins ◽  
High Energy ◽  
Disordered Proteins ◽  
Missense Mutations ◽  
Local Minima ◽  
3D Structures ◽  
Functional Roles ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered Regions ◽  
Disordered Regions

Background: It is well known that disease-causing missense mutations (DCMMs) reduce the structural stability/integrity of the proteins with well-defined 3D structures, thereby impacting their molecular functions. However, it is not known in what way DCMMs affect the intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) that do not adopt well defined stable 3D structures. Methods: In order to investigate how DCMMs may impact intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) in proteins, we undertook Molecular Dynamics (MD) based studies on three different examples of functionally important IDRs with known DCMMs. Our studies revealed that the functional impact of DCMMs is in reducing the conformational heterogeneity of IDRs, which is intrinsic and quintessential for their multi-faceted cellular roles. Results: These results are reinforced by energy landscapes of the wildtype and mutant IDRs where the former is characterized by many local minima separated by low barriers, whereas the latter are characterized by one global minimum and several local minima separated by high energy barriers. Our MD based studies also indicate that DCMMs stabilize very few structural possibilities of IDRs either by the newly formed interactions induced by the substituted side chains or by means of restricted or increased flexibilities of the backbone conformations at the mutation sites. Conclusion: Furthermore, the structural possibilities stabilized by DCMMs do not support the native functional roles of the IDRs, thereby leading to disease conditions.

scholarly journals Effect of Disease Causing Missense Mutations on Intrinsically Disordered Regions in Proteins

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suryanarayana Seera ◽  
H.A. Nagarajaram
Keyword(s):  
Intrinsically Disordered Proteins ◽  
High Energy ◽  
Disordered Proteins ◽  
Missense Mutations ◽  
Local Minima ◽  
3D Structures ◽  
Functional Roles ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered Regions ◽  
Disordered Regions

AbstractIt is well known that disease-causing missense mutations (DCMMs) reduce the structural stability/integrity of the proteins with well-defined 3D structures thereby impacting their molecular functions. However, it is not known in what way DCMMs affect the intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) that do not adopt well defined stable 3D structures. In order to investigate how DCMMs may impact intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) in proteins we undertook Molecular Dynamics (MD) based studies on three different examples of functionally important IDRs with known DCMMs. Our studies revealed that the functional impact of DCMMs is in reducing the conformational heterogeneity of IDRs which is intrinsic and quintessential for their multi-faceted cellular roles. These results are reinforced by energy landscapes of the wildtype and mutant IDRs where the former is characterized by many local minima separated by low barriers whereas the latter are characterized by one global minimum and several local minima separated by high energy barriers. Our MD based studies also indicate that DCMMs stabilize a very few structural possibilities of IDRs either by the newly formed interactions induced by the substituted side chains or by means of restricted or increased flexibilities of the backbone conformations at the mutation sites. Furthermore, the structural possibilities stabilized by DCMMs do not support the native functional roles of the IDRs thereby leading to disease conditions.

scholarly journals Intrinsically disordered proteins and structured proteins with intrinsically disordered regions have different functional roles in the cell

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Deiana ◽  
Sergio Forcelloni ◽  
Alessandro Porrello ◽  
Andrea Giansanti
Keyword(s):  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered Proteins ◽  
Disordered Proteins ◽  
General Category ◽  
Large Set ◽  
Functional Roles ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered Regions ◽  
Structured Proteins ◽  
Disordered Regions

AbstractMany studies about classification and the functional annotation of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) are based on either the occurrence of long disordered regions or the fraction of disordered residues in the sequence. Taking into account both criteria we separate the human proteome, taken as a case study, into three variants of proteins: i) ordered proteins (ORDPs), ii) structured proteins with intrinsically disordered regions (IDPRs), and iii) intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs). The focus of this work is on the different functional roles of IDPs and IDPRs, which up until now have been generally considered as a whole. Previous studies assigned a large set of functional roles to the general category of IDPs. We show here that IDPs and IDPRs have non-overlapping functional spectra, play different roles in human diseases, and deserve to be treated as distinct categories of proteins. IDPs enrich only a few classes, functions, and processes: nucleic acid binding proteins, chromatin binding proteins, transcription factors, and developmental processes. In contrast, IDPRs are spread over several functional protein classes and GO annotations which they partly share with ORDPs. As regards to diseases, we observe that IDPs enrich only cancer-related proteins, at variance with previous results reporting that IDPs are widespread also in cardiovascular and neurodegenerative pathologies. Overall, the operational separation of IDPRs from IDPs is relevant towards correct estimates of the occurrence of intrinsically disordered proteins in genome-wide studies and in the understanding of the functional spectra associated to different flavors of protein disorder.

scholarly journals Intrinsically disordered proteins identified in the aggregate proteome serve as biomarkers of neurodegeneration

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Srinivas Ayyadevara ◽  
Akshatha Ganne ◽  
Meenakshisundaram Balasubramaniam ◽  
Robert J. Shmookler Reis
Keyword(s):  
Intrinsically Disordered Proteins ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Disordered Proteins ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered Regions ◽  
Physiological Processes ◽  
Protein Partners ◽  
And Function ◽  
Computational Analyses ◽  
Disordered Regions

AbstractA protein’s structure is determined by its amino acid sequence and post-translational modifications, and provides the basis for its physiological functions. Across all organisms, roughly a third of the proteome comprises proteins that contain highly unstructured or intrinsically disordered regions. Proteins comprising or containing extensive unstructured regions are referred to as intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs). IDPs are believed to participate in complex physiological processes through refolding of IDP regions, dependent on their binding to a diverse array of potential protein partners. They thus play critical roles in the assembly and function of protein complexes. Recent advances in experimental and computational analyses predicted multiple interacting partners for the disordered regions of proteins, implying critical roles in signal transduction and regulation of biological processes. Numerous disordered proteins are sequestered into aggregates in neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD) where they are enriched even in serum, making them good candidates for serum biomarkers to enable early detection of AD.

scholarly journals Stabilization Effect of Intrinsically Disordered Regions on Multidomain Proteins: The Case of the Methyl-CpG Protein 2, MeCP2

Biomolecules ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 1216
Author(s):  
David Ortega-Alarcon ◽  
Rafael Claveria-Gimeno ◽  
Sonia Vega ◽  
Olga C. Jorge-Torres ◽  
Manel Esteller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Thermal Denaturation ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered Proteins ◽  
Fluorescence Probe ◽  
Intramolecular Interactions ◽  
Disordered Proteins ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered Regions ◽  
Intrinsic Stability ◽  
Stabilization Effect ◽  
Disordered Regions

Intrinsic disorder plays an important functional role in proteins. Disordered regions are linked to posttranslational modifications, conformational switching, extra/intracellular trafficking, and allosteric control, among other phenomena. Disorder provides proteins with enhanced plasticity, resulting in a dynamic protein conformational/functional landscape, with well-structured and disordered regions displaying reciprocal, interdependent features. Although lacking well-defined conformation, disordered regions may affect the intrinsic stability and functional properties of ordered regions. MeCP2, methyl-CpG binding protein 2, is a multifunctional transcriptional regulator associated with neuronal development and maturation. MeCP2 multidomain structure makes it a prototype for multidomain, multifunctional, intrinsically disordered proteins (IDP). The methyl-binding domain (MBD) is one of the key domains in MeCP2, responsible for DNA recognition. It has been reported previously that the two disordered domains flanking MBD, the N-terminal domain (NTD) and the intervening domain (ID), increase the intrinsic stability of MBD against thermal denaturation. In order to prove unequivocally this stabilization effect, ruling out any artifactual result from monitoring the unfolding MBD with a local fluorescence probe (the single tryptophan in MBD) or from driving the protein unfolding by temperature, we have studied the MBD stability by differential scanning calorimetry (reporting on the global unfolding process) and chemical denaturation (altering intramolecular interactions by a different mechanism compared to thermal denaturation).

Affinity versus specificity in coupled binding and folding reactions

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefano Gianni ◽  
Per Jemth
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered Proteins ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered Protein ◽  
High Specificity ◽  
Disordered Proteins ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered Regions ◽  
Interaction Interface ◽  
Disordered Regions

Abstract Intrinsically disordered protein regions may fold upon binding to an interaction partner. It is often argued that such coupled binding and folding enables the combination of high specificity with low affinity. The basic tenet is that an unfavorable folding equilibrium will make the overall binding weaker while maintaining the interaction interface. While theoretically solid, we argue that this concept may be misleading for intrinsically disordered proteins. In fact, experimental evidence suggests that interactions of disordered regions usually involve extended conformations. In such cases, the disordered region is exceptionally unlikely to fold into a bound conformation in the absence of its binding partner. Instead, these disordered regions can bind to their partners in multiple different conformations and then fold into the native bound complex, thus, if anything, increasing the affinity through folding. We concede that (de)stabilization of native structural elements such as helices will modulate affinity, but this could work both ways, decreasing or increasing the stability of the complex. Moreover, experimental data show that intrinsically disordered binding regions display a range of affinities and specificities dictated by the particular side chains and length of the disordered region and not necessarily by the fact that they are disordered. We find it more likely that intrinsically disordered regions are common in protein–protein interactions because they increase the repertoire of binding partners, providing an accessible route to evolve interactions rather than providing a stability–affinity trade-off.

scholarly journals Interactions between the Intrinsically Disordered Regions of hnRNP-A2 and TDP-43 Accelerate TDP-43′s Conformational Transition

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (16) ◽  
pp. 5930
Author(s):  
Wan-Chin Chiang ◽  
Ming-Hsuan Lee ◽  
Tsai-Chen Chen ◽  
Jie-rong Huang
Keyword(s):  
Intrinsically Disordered Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Conformational Transition ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Sequence Similarity ◽  
Disordered Proteins ◽  
General Mechanism ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered Regions ◽  
Disordered Regions

Most biological functions involve protein–protein interactions. Our understanding of these interactions is based mainly on those of structured proteins, because encounters between intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) or proteins with intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) are much less studied, regardless of the fact that more than half eukaryotic proteins contain IDRs. RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) are a large family whose members almost all have IDRs in addition to RNA binding domains. These IDRs, having low sequence similarity, interact, but structural details on these interactions are still lacking. Here, using the IDRs of two RBPs (hnRNA-A2 and TDP-43) as a model, we demonstrate that the rate at which TDP-43′s IDR undergoes the neurodegenerative disease related α-helix-to-β-sheet transition increases in relation to the amount of hnRNP-A2′s IDR that is present. There are more than 1500 RBPs in human cells and most of them have IDRs. RBPs often join the same complexes to regulate genes. In addition to the structured RNA-recognition motifs, our study demonstrates a general mechanism through which RBPs may regulate each other’s functions through their IDRs.

scholarly journals shiny-pred: a server for the prediction of protein disordered regions

F1000Research ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 230
Author(s):  
Mauricio Oberti ◽  
Iosif Vaisman
Keyword(s):  
Web Application ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered Proteins ◽  
Sequence Data ◽  
Disordered Proteins ◽  
Dimensional Structure ◽  
Protein Chain ◽  
Neural Network Models ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered Regions ◽  
Disordered Regions

Intrinsically disordered proteins or intrinsically disordered regions (IDR) are segments within a protein chain lacking a stable three-dimensional structure under normal physiological conditions. Accurate prediction of IDRs is challenging due to their genome wide occurrence and low ratio of disordered residues, making them a difficult target for traditional classification techniques. Existing computational methods mostly rely on sequence profiles to improve accuracy, which is time consuming and computationally expensive. The shiny-pred application is an ab initio sequence-only disorder predictor implemented in R/Shiny language. In order to make predictions, it uses convolutional neural network models, trained using PDB sequence data. It can be installed on any operating system on which R can be installed and run locally. A public version of the web application can be accessed at https://gmu-binf.shinyapps.io/shiny-pred

scholarly journals Functional Segments on Intrinsically Disordered Regions in Disease-Related Proteins

Biomolecules ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroto Anbo ◽  
Masaya Sato ◽  
Atsushi Okoshi ◽  
Satoshi Fukuchi
Keyword(s):  
Intrinsically Disordered Proteins ◽  
Disordered Proteins ◽  
Protein Protein Interaction ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered Regions ◽  
Protein Protein Interaction Networks ◽  
Digestive System Diseases ◽  
To Come ◽  
Related Proteins ◽  
Disordered Regions

One of the unique characteristics of intrinsically disordered proteins (IPDs) is the existence of functional segments in intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs). A typical function of these segments is binding to partner molecules, such as proteins and DNAs. These segments play important roles in signaling pathways and transcriptional regulation. We conducted bioinformatics analysis to search these functional segments based on IDR predictions and database annotations. We found more than a thousand potential functional IDR segments in disease-related proteins. Large fractions of proteins related to cancers, congenital disorders, digestive system diseases, and reproductive system diseases have these functional IDRs. Some proteins in nervous system diseases have long functional segments in IDRs. The detailed analysis of some of these regions showed that the functional segments are located on experimentally verified IDRs. The proteins with functional IDR segments generally tend to come and go between the cytoplasm and the nucleus. Proteins involved in multiple diseases tend to have more protein-protein interactors, suggesting that hub proteins in the protein-protein interaction networks can have multiple impacts on human diseases.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document