scholarly journals Intrinsically disordered proteins identified in the aggregate proteome serve as biomarkers of neurodegeneration

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Srinivas Ayyadevara ◽  
Akshatha Ganne ◽  
Meenakshisundaram Balasubramaniam ◽  
Robert J. Shmookler Reis
Keyword(s):  
Intrinsically Disordered Proteins ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Disordered Proteins ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered Regions ◽  
Physiological Processes ◽  
Protein Partners ◽  
And Function ◽  
Computational Analyses ◽  
Disordered Regions

AbstractA protein’s structure is determined by its amino acid sequence and post-translational modifications, and provides the basis for its physiological functions. Across all organisms, roughly a third of the proteome comprises proteins that contain highly unstructured or intrinsically disordered regions. Proteins comprising or containing extensive unstructured regions are referred to as intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs). IDPs are believed to participate in complex physiological processes through refolding of IDP regions, dependent on their binding to a diverse array of potential protein partners. They thus play critical roles in the assembly and function of protein complexes. Recent advances in experimental and computational analyses predicted multiple interacting partners for the disordered regions of proteins, implying critical roles in signal transduction and regulation of biological processes. Numerous disordered proteins are sequestered into aggregates in neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD) where they are enriched even in serum, making them good candidates for serum biomarkers to enable early detection of AD.

scholarly journals Combinatorial phosphorylation modulates the structure and function of the G protein gamma subunit in yeast

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zahra Nassiri Toosi ◽  
Xinya Su ◽  
Shilpa Choudhury ◽  
Wei Li ◽  
Yui Tik Pang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
G Protein ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered Proteins ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Disordered Proteins ◽  
Post Translational Modification ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered Regions ◽  
Gpcr Activation ◽  
Essential Components ◽  
And Function

AbstractProtein intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) are often targets of combinatorial post-translational modifications (PTMs) that serve to regulate protein structure and/or function. Emerging evidence suggests that the N-terminal tails of G protein γ subunits – essential components of heterotrimeric G protein complexes – are intrinsically disordered, highly phosphorylated governors of G protein signaling. Here, we demonstrate that the yeast Gγ Ste18 undergoes combinatorial, multi-site phosphorylation within its N-terminal IDR. Phosphorylation at S7 is responsive to GPCR activation and osmotic stress while phosphorylation at S3 is responsive to glucose stress and is a quantitative indicator of intracellular pH. Each site is phosphorylated by a distinct set of kinases and both are also interactive, such that phosphomimicry at one site affects phosphorylation on the other. Lastly, we show that phosphorylation produces subtle yet clear changes in IDR structure and that different combinations of phosphorylation modulate the activation rate and amplitude of the scaffolded MAPK Fus3. These data place Gγ subunits among the growing list of intrinsically disordered proteins that exploit combinatorial post-translational modification to govern signaling pathway output.

scholarly journals The Distinct Properties of the Consecutive Disordered Regions Inside or Outside Protein Domains and Their Functional Significance

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (19) ◽  
pp. 10677
Author(s):  
Huqiang Wang ◽  
Haolin Zhong ◽  
Chao Gao ◽  
Jiayin Zang ◽  
Dong Yang
Keyword(s):  
Intrinsically Disordered Proteins ◽  
Protein Domains ◽  
Comprehensive Analysis ◽  
Disordered Proteins ◽  
Functional Constraints ◽  
Biological Functions ◽  
Post Translational Modification ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
And Function ◽  
Disordered Regions

The consecutive disordered regions (CDRs) are the basis for the formation of intrinsically disordered proteins, which contribute to various biological functions and increasing organism complexity. Previous studies have revealed that CDRs may be present inside or outside protein domains, but a comprehensive analysis of the property differences between these two types of CDRs and the proteins containing them is lacking. In this study, we investigated this issue from three viewpoints. Firstly, we found that in-domain CDRs are more hydrophilic and stable but have less stickiness and fewer post-translational modification sites compared with out-domain CDRs. Secondly, at the protein level, we found that proteins with only in-domain CDRs originated late, evolved rapidly, and had weak functional constraints, compared with the other two types of CDR-containing proteins. Proteins with only in-domain CDRs tend to be expressed spatiotemporal specifically, but they tend to have higher abundance and are more stable. Thirdly, we screened the CDR-containing protein domains that have a strong correlation with organism complexity. The CDR-containing domains tend to be evolutionarily young, or they changed from a domain without CDR to a CDR-containing domain during evolution. These results provide valuable new insights about the evolution and function of CDRs and protein domains.

scholarly journals Stabilization Effect of Intrinsically Disordered Regions on Multidomain Proteins: The Case of the Methyl-CpG Protein 2, MeCP2

Biomolecules ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 1216
Author(s):  
David Ortega-Alarcon ◽  
Rafael Claveria-Gimeno ◽  
Sonia Vega ◽  
Olga C. Jorge-Torres ◽  
Manel Esteller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Thermal Denaturation ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered Proteins ◽  
Fluorescence Probe ◽  
Intramolecular Interactions ◽  
Disordered Proteins ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered Regions ◽  
Intrinsic Stability ◽  
Stabilization Effect ◽  
Disordered Regions

Intrinsic disorder plays an important functional role in proteins. Disordered regions are linked to posttranslational modifications, conformational switching, extra/intracellular trafficking, and allosteric control, among other phenomena. Disorder provides proteins with enhanced plasticity, resulting in a dynamic protein conformational/functional landscape, with well-structured and disordered regions displaying reciprocal, interdependent features. Although lacking well-defined conformation, disordered regions may affect the intrinsic stability and functional properties of ordered regions. MeCP2, methyl-CpG binding protein 2, is a multifunctional transcriptional regulator associated with neuronal development and maturation. MeCP2 multidomain structure makes it a prototype for multidomain, multifunctional, intrinsically disordered proteins (IDP). The methyl-binding domain (MBD) is one of the key domains in MeCP2, responsible for DNA recognition. It has been reported previously that the two disordered domains flanking MBD, the N-terminal domain (NTD) and the intervening domain (ID), increase the intrinsic stability of MBD against thermal denaturation. In order to prove unequivocally this stabilization effect, ruling out any artifactual result from monitoring the unfolding MBD with a local fluorescence probe (the single tryptophan in MBD) or from driving the protein unfolding by temperature, we have studied the MBD stability by differential scanning calorimetry (reporting on the global unfolding process) and chemical denaturation (altering intramolecular interactions by a different mechanism compared to thermal denaturation).

scholarly journals Single-embryo phosphoproteomics reveals the importance of intrinsic disorder in cell cycle dynamics

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Manuel Valverde ◽  
Geronimo Dubra ◽  
Henk van den Toorn ◽  
Guido van Mierlo ◽  
Michiel Vermeulen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered Proteins ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Disordered Proteins ◽  
Cell Cycles ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered Regions ◽  
Egg Extracts ◽  
Cell Cycle Dynamics

Switch-like cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)-1 activation is thought to underlie the abruptness of mitotic onset, but how CDKs can simultaneously phosphorylate many diverse substrates is unknown, and direct evidence for such phosphorylation dynamics in vivo is lacking. Here, we analysed protein phosphorylation states in single Xenopus embryos throughout synchronous cell cycles. Over a thousand phosphosites were dynamic in vivo, and assignment of cell cycle phases using egg extracts revealed hundreds of S-phase phosphorylations. Targeted phosphoproteomics in single embryos showed switch-like mitotic phosphorylation of diverse protein complexes. The majority of cell cycle-regulated phosphosites occurred in CDK consensus motifs, and 72% located to intrinsically disordered regions. Dynamically phosphorylated proteins, and documented substrates of cell cycle kinases, are significantly more disordered than phosphoproteins in general. Furthermore, 30-50% are components of membraneless organelles. Our results suggest that phosphorylation of intrinsically disordered proteins by cell cycle kinases, particularly CDKs, allows switch-like mitotic cellular reorganisation.

scholarly journals Intrinsically disordered proteins and structured proteins with intrinsically disordered regions have different functional roles in the cell

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Deiana ◽  
Sergio Forcelloni ◽  
Alessandro Porrello ◽  
Andrea Giansanti
Keyword(s):  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered Proteins ◽  
Disordered Proteins ◽  
General Category ◽  
Large Set ◽  
Functional Roles ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered Regions ◽  
Structured Proteins ◽  
Disordered Regions

AbstractMany studies about classification and the functional annotation of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) are based on either the occurrence of long disordered regions or the fraction of disordered residues in the sequence. Taking into account both criteria we separate the human proteome, taken as a case study, into three variants of proteins: i) ordered proteins (ORDPs), ii) structured proteins with intrinsically disordered regions (IDPRs), and iii) intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs). The focus of this work is on the different functional roles of IDPs and IDPRs, which up until now have been generally considered as a whole. Previous studies assigned a large set of functional roles to the general category of IDPs. We show here that IDPs and IDPRs have non-overlapping functional spectra, play different roles in human diseases, and deserve to be treated as distinct categories of proteins. IDPs enrich only a few classes, functions, and processes: nucleic acid binding proteins, chromatin binding proteins, transcription factors, and developmental processes. In contrast, IDPRs are spread over several functional protein classes and GO annotations which they partly share with ORDPs. As regards to diseases, we observe that IDPs enrich only cancer-related proteins, at variance with previous results reporting that IDPs are widespread also in cardiovascular and neurodegenerative pathologies. Overall, the operational separation of IDPRs from IDPs is relevant towards correct estimates of the occurrence of intrinsically disordered proteins in genome-wide studies and in the understanding of the functional spectra associated to different flavors of protein disorder.

scholarly journals Combinatorial phosphorylation modulates the structure and function of the G protein γ subunit in yeast

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (688) ◽  
pp. eabd2464
Author(s):  
Zahra Nassiri Toosi ◽  
Xinya Su ◽  
Ruth Austin ◽  
Shilpa Choudhury ◽  
Wei Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
G Protein ◽  
Posttranslational Modifications ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered Proteins ◽  
Structure And Function ◽  
Disordered Proteins ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered Regions ◽  
Gpcr Activation ◽  
Essential Components ◽  
And Function

Intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) in proteins are often targets of combinatorial posttranslational modifications, which serve to regulate protein structure and function. Emerging evidence suggests that the N-terminal tails of G protein γ subunits, which are essential components of heterotrimeric G proteins, are intrinsically disordered, phosphorylation-dependent determinants of G protein signaling. Here, we found that the yeast Gγ subunit Ste18 underwent combinatorial, multisite phosphorylation events within its N-terminal IDR. G protein–coupled receptor (GPCR) activation and osmotic stress induced phosphorylation at Ser7, whereas glucose and acid stress induced phosphorylation at Ser3, which was a quantitative indicator of intracellular pH. Each site was phosphorylated by a distinct set of kinases, and phosphorylation of one site affected phosphorylation of the other, as determined through exposure to serial stimuli and through phosphosite mutagenesis. Last, we showed that phosphorylation resulted in changes in IDR structure and that different combinations of phosphorylation events modulated the activation rate and amplitude of the downstream mitogen-activated protein kinase Fus3. These data place Gγ subunits among intrinsically disordered proteins that undergo combinatorial posttranslational modifications that govern signaling pathway output.

Affinity versus specificity in coupled binding and folding reactions

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefano Gianni ◽  
Per Jemth
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered Proteins ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered Protein ◽  
High Specificity ◽  
Disordered Proteins ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered Regions ◽  
Interaction Interface ◽  
Disordered Regions

Abstract Intrinsically disordered protein regions may fold upon binding to an interaction partner. It is often argued that such coupled binding and folding enables the combination of high specificity with low affinity. The basic tenet is that an unfavorable folding equilibrium will make the overall binding weaker while maintaining the interaction interface. While theoretically solid, we argue that this concept may be misleading for intrinsically disordered proteins. In fact, experimental evidence suggests that interactions of disordered regions usually involve extended conformations. In such cases, the disordered region is exceptionally unlikely to fold into a bound conformation in the absence of its binding partner. Instead, these disordered regions can bind to their partners in multiple different conformations and then fold into the native bound complex, thus, if anything, increasing the affinity through folding. We concede that (de)stabilization of native structural elements such as helices will modulate affinity, but this could work both ways, decreasing or increasing the stability of the complex. Moreover, experimental data show that intrinsically disordered binding regions display a range of affinities and specificities dictated by the particular side chains and length of the disordered region and not necessarily by the fact that they are disordered. We find it more likely that intrinsically disordered regions are common in protein–protein interactions because they increase the repertoire of binding partners, providing an accessible route to evolve interactions rather than providing a stability–affinity trade-off.

scholarly journals Interactions between the Intrinsically Disordered Regions of hnRNP-A2 and TDP-43 Accelerate TDP-43′s Conformational Transition

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (16) ◽  
pp. 5930
Author(s):  
Wan-Chin Chiang ◽  
Ming-Hsuan Lee ◽  
Tsai-Chen Chen ◽  
Jie-rong Huang
Keyword(s):  
Intrinsically Disordered Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Conformational Transition ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Sequence Similarity ◽  
Disordered Proteins ◽  
General Mechanism ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered Regions ◽  
Disordered Regions

Most biological functions involve protein–protein interactions. Our understanding of these interactions is based mainly on those of structured proteins, because encounters between intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) or proteins with intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) are much less studied, regardless of the fact that more than half eukaryotic proteins contain IDRs. RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) are a large family whose members almost all have IDRs in addition to RNA binding domains. These IDRs, having low sequence similarity, interact, but structural details on these interactions are still lacking. Here, using the IDRs of two RBPs (hnRNA-A2 and TDP-43) as a model, we demonstrate that the rate at which TDP-43′s IDR undergoes the neurodegenerative disease related α-helix-to-β-sheet transition increases in relation to the amount of hnRNP-A2′s IDR that is present. There are more than 1500 RBPs in human cells and most of them have IDRs. RBPs often join the same complexes to regulate genes. In addition to the structured RNA-recognition motifs, our study demonstrates a general mechanism through which RBPs may regulate each other’s functions through their IDRs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document