Do the Fibrin Architecture and Leukocyte Content Influence the Growth Factor Release of Platelet Concentrates? An Evidence-based Answer Comparing a Pure Platelet-Rich Plasma (P-PRP) Gel and a Leukocyte- and Platelet-Rich Fibrin (L-PRF)

2012 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. 1145-1152 ◽  
Author(s):  
David M. Dohan Ehrenfest ◽  
Tomasz Bielecki ◽  
Ryo Jimbo ◽  
Giovanni Barbe ◽  
Marco Del Corso ◽  
...  
Vox Sanguinis ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 105 (2) ◽  
pp. 129-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Durante ◽  
F. Agostini ◽  
L. Abbruzzese ◽  
R. T. Toffola ◽  
S. Zanolin ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos E Giraldo ◽  
Catalina López ◽  
María E Álvarez ◽  
Ismael J Samudio ◽  
Marta Prades ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (10) ◽  
pp. 3425-3436 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastian Blatt ◽  
Valentin Burkhardt ◽  
Peer W. Kämmerer ◽  
Andreas M. Pabst ◽  
Keyvan Sagheb ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives Porcine-derived collagen matrices (CM) can be used for oral tissue regeneration, but sufficient revascularization is crucial. The aim of this study was to analyze the influence of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) on angiogenesis of different CM in vitro and in vivo. Materials and methods Three different CM (mucoderm, jason, collprotect) were combined with PRF in a plotting process. Growth factor release (VEGF, TGF-β) was measured in vitro via ELISA quantification after 1,4 and 7 days in comparison to PRF alone. In ovo yolk sac (YSM) and chorion allantois membrane (CAM) model, angiogenic potential were analyzed in vivo with light- and intravital fluorescence microscopy after 24 h, then verified with immunohistochemical staining for CD105 and αSMA. Results Highest growth factor release was seen after 24 h for all three activated membranes in comparison to the native CM (VEGF 24 h: each p < 0.05; TGF-β: each p < 0.001) and the PRF (no significant difference). All activated membranes revealed a significantly increased angiogenic potential in vivo after 24 h (vessels per mm2: each p < 0.05; branching points per mm2: each p < 0.01; vessel density: each p < 0.05) and with immunohistochemical staining for CD105 (each p < 0.01) and αSMA (each p < 0.05). Conclusions PRF improved the angiogenesis of CM in vitro and in vivo. Clinical relevance Bio-functionalization of CM with PRF could easily implemented in the clinical pathway and may lead to advanced soft tissue healing.


2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (5) ◽  
pp. 1223-1229 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prathap Jayaram ◽  
Peter Yeh ◽  
Shiv J. Patel ◽  
Racel Cela ◽  
Theodore B. Shybut ◽  
...  

Background: The benefits of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) are believed to be in part dependent on growth factor release after platelet activation. Platelet activation is complex and involves multiple mechanisms. One important mechanism is driven by cyclooxygenase 1 (COX-1)–mediated conversion of arachidonic acid (AA) to precursor prostaglandins that then mediate proinflammatory responses that trigger growth factor release. Acetylsalicylic acid (ASA; also known as aspirin) is known to irreversibly inhibit COX-1, thereby blocking AA-mediated signaling; however, it is unclear whether ASA use alters growth factor release from freshly isolated PRP. Purpose: To assess the effects of low-dose ASA use on activation of growth factor release from freshly isolated human PRP via AA and thrombin (TBN). Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Twelve healthy men underwent blood collection and leukocyte-rich PRP (LR-PRP) preparation through a double-spin protocol to obtain baseline whole blood and PRP counts the same day. PRP was aliquoted into 3 groups: nonactivated, AA activated, and TBN activated. Immediately after activation, the concentrations of transforming growth factor β1 (TGF-β1), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and platelet-derived growth factor AB (PDGF-AB) were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs). The same 12 participants were then placed on an 81-mg daily dose of oral ASA for 14 days. Repeat characterization of whole blood and PRP analyses was done on day 14, followed by repeat ELISAs of growth factors under the same nonactivated and activated settings as previously stated. Results: Fourteen days of daily ASA had no effect on the number of platelets and leukocytes measured in whole blood and LR-PRP. Compared with nonactivated LR-PRP, AA- and TBN-mediated activation led to significant release of VEGF and PDGF-AB. In contrast, release of TGF-β1 from LR-PRP was observed only with activation by AA, not with TBN. Consistent with its inhibitory role in AA signaling, ASA significantly inhibited AA-mediated release of all 3 growth factors measured in this study. Although ASA had no effect on TBN-mediated release of VEGF and TGF-β1 from LR-PRP, ASA did partially block TBN-mediated release of PDGF-AB, although the mechanism remains unclear. Conclusion: Daily use of low-dose ASA reduces VEGF, PDGF-AB, and TGF-β1 expression in freshly isolated human LR-PRP when activated with AA. Clinical Relevance: Reduction in growth factor release attributed to daily use of low-dose ASA or other COX inhibitors can be mitigated when PRP samples are activated with TBN. Clinical studies are needed to determine whether activation before PRP injection is needed in all applications where ASA is in use and to what extent ASA may inhibit growth factor release in vivo at the site of injury.


2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 327-334 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiujie Zhang ◽  
Jingwei Wang ◽  
Mingguang Ren ◽  
Lifeng Li ◽  
Qingwen Wang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document