Unveiling Novel Therapeutic Drug Targets and Prognostic Markers of Triple Negative Breast Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Acharya Balkrishna ◽  
Rashmi Mittal ◽  
Vedpriya Arya
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Drug Targets ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Prognostic Markers ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Immunological Response ◽  
Therapeutic Drug ◽  
Ki 67 ◽  
Brca1 Promoter Methylation

: Triple negative breast cancer represents multiple genomic and transcriptomic heterogeneities. Genetic and epigenetic changes emerging in TNBC help it in acquiring resistance against immunological response. Distant metastasis, lack of clinically targeted therapies and prognostic markers make it the most aggressive form of breast cancer. In this review, we showed that driver alterations in targeted genes AR, ERR, TIL, TAM, miRNA, mTOR and immunosuppressive cytokines are predominantly involved in complicating TNBC by inducing cell proliferation, invasion and metastasis, and by inhibiting apoptosis. The role of node status, cathepsin-D, Ki-67 index, CD3+TIL, BRCA1 promoter methylation value and p53 as an efficient prognostic factor have also been studied to predict the disease free and overall survival rate in TNBC patients. The present review article is an attempt to gain an insight with a new vision on the etiology of TNBC, its treatment strategies and prognostic marker to identify the outcome of standard therapies and to re-design future treatment strategies to provide maximum benefit to patients.

scholarly journals Correction: Androgen Receptor (AR), E-Cadherin, and Ki-67 as Emerging Targets and Novel Prognostic Markers in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) Patients

PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. e0132647 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppina Rosaria Rita Ricciardi ◽  
Barbara Adamo ◽  
Antonio Ieni ◽  
Luana Licata ◽  
Roberta Cardia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Androgen Receptor ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Prognostic Markers ◽  
Ki 67 ◽  
E Cadherin

scholarly journals P53 and Ki-67 as prognostic markers in triple-negative breast cancer patients

PLoS ONE ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. e0172324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yunbao Pan ◽  
Yufen Yuan ◽  
Guoshi Liu ◽  
Yongchang Wei
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Prognostic Markers ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Ki 67

scholarly journals Androgen Receptor (AR), E-Cadherin, and Ki-67 as Emerging Targets and Novel Prognostic Markers in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) Patients

PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. e0128368 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppina Rosaria Rita Ricciardi ◽  
Barbara Adamo ◽  
Antonio Ieni ◽  
Luana Licata ◽  
Roberta Cardia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Androgen Receptor ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Prognostic Markers ◽  
Ki 67 ◽  
E Cadherin

scholarly journals Distinct Somatic Alteration Features Identified by Gene Panel Sequencing in Korean Triple-Negative Breast Cancer with High Ki67 Expression

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 416
Author(s):  
Woo Young Sun ◽  
Jina Lee ◽  
Bong Kyun Kim ◽  
Jong Ok Kim ◽  
Joonhong Park
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Hormone Receptor ◽  
Mutation Frequency ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Genetic Difference ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Ki 67 ◽  
Hormone Receptor Positive ◽  
Somatic Alteration

This study aimed to clarify the genetic difference between Korean triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and other breast cancer (BC) subtypes. TNBC was defined as the absence of hormonal receptors and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) amplification. DNA panel of the Ion Torrent Oncomine Comprehensive Assay (OCA) v3 was performed to identify somatic alteration in 48 specimens. In a total of 102 alterations (37 nonsense, 35 missense, 8 frameshift and 22 amplifications), 30 nucleotide alterations (24 nonsense, 1 missense, and 5 frameshift) were newly identified. The eight most commonly altered genes were PIK3CA, TP53, ERBB2, BRCA2, FANCD2, AKT1, BRCA1, and FANCA. TNBC had significantly lower mutation frequency in PIK3CA (TNBC vs. hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative BC [HRPBC], p = 0.009), but higher mutation frequency in TP53 (TNBC vs. HRPBC, p = 0.036; TNBC vs. hormone receptor-positive and HER2- positive BC [HHPBC], p = 0.004). TNBC showed frequently higher Ki-67 expression than any positive BC (p = 0.004) due to HRPBC (p < 0.001). TNBC with high Ki-67/unmutated PIK3CA/mutated TP53 appears at a younger age (52.2 ± 7.6 years), compared to other subtypes (63.7 ± 11.0 years). TNBC with high Ki-67/unmutated PIK3CA/mutated TP53 may be related to relatively early onset BCThese findings demonstrate the genomic heterogeneity between TNBC and other BC subtypes and could present a new approach for molecular targeted therapy in TNBC patients.

scholarly journals Mibefradil inhibits the proliferation of triple-negative breast cancer by targeting AURKA to regulate apoptosis signal pathway

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xu Han ◽  
Xiujuan Qu ◽  
Beixing Liu ◽  
Yizhe Wang ◽  
Yang Cheng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Molecular Docking ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Therapeutic Drug ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
In Vivo Models

Abstract Background: Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a tumor characterized by high recurrence and mortality, but without effective targeted therapy. It is urgent to explore new treatment strategy to improve the efficacy of TNBC therapy. Methods: Transcriptomic profiling datasets of TNBC were used for screening TNBC specific gene sets. Drug prediction was performed in Connectivity map (CMap) database. Molecular docking method was used for analyzing drug targets. In vitro and in vivo models of TNBC were constructed to examine the drug efficacy. Results: We screened out Mibefradil, a T-type Ca2+ channel blocker, might be a potential therapeutic drug for TNBC by transcriptomics and bioinformatics analysis, and verified that Mibefradil could inhibit the proliferation of TNBC cells by inducing apoptosis and cell cycle arrest. Furthermore, by network pharmacology and molecular docking analysis, AURKA was predicted as the most possible drug target of Mibefradil. Finally, it was proved that Mibefradil treatment could induce apoptosis by decreasing protein expression and phosphorylation level of AURKA in vitro and in vivo. Conclusions: Mibefradil played anti-cancer role in TNBC cells by targeting to AURKA to induce cell cycle and apoptosis. Our results repurposed Mibefradil as a potential targeted drug of TNBC and provided a fundamental research for a novel strategy TNBC treatment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document