Unveiling Novel Therapeutic Drug Targets and Prognostic Markers of Triple Negative Breast Cancer

: Triple negative breast cancer represents multiple genomic and transcriptomic heterogeneities. Genetic and epigenetic changes emerging in TNBC help it in acquiring resistance against immunological response. Distant metastasis, lack of clinically targeted therapies and prognostic markers make it the most aggressive form of breast cancer. In this review, we showed that driver alterations in targeted genes AR, ERR, TIL, TAM, miRNA, mTOR and immunosuppressive cytokines are predominantly involved in complicating TNBC by inducing cell proliferation, invasion and metastasis, and by inhibiting apoptosis. The role of node status, cathepsin-D, Ki-67 index, CD3+TIL, BRCA1 promoter methylation value and p53 as an efficient prognostic factor have also been studied to predict the disease free and overall survival rate in TNBC patients. The present review article is an attempt to gain an insight with a new vision on the etiology of TNBC, its treatment strategies and prognostic marker to identify the outcome of standard therapies and to re-design future treatment strategies to provide maximum benefit to patients.

Specific BRCA and immune configurations determine optimal response to platinum-based chemotherapy in triple negative breast and ovarian carcinomas

Loss of homologous recombination repair (HRR) via germline and somatic BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene mutations and via BRCA1 promoter methylation has been associated with better response to platinum agents and PARP inhibitors, in both triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) and ovarian carcinoma (OvCa). A major conundrum arising from recent clinical studies is why cancers with BRCA1 promoter methylation (BRCA1meth) respond more poorly as compared to those bearing mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCAmut), given the biologically equivalent HRR deficiency in both states. We dissected this problem through detailed genomic analyses of primary TNBC and OvCa cohorts, as well as experimentation with patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models and genetically engineered cell lines. Using the precise genomic scar of the tandem duplicator phenotype as a precise genomic indicator of BRCA1 deficiency, we found that, in all cohorts, BRCA1mut and BRCA1meth cancers share an equivalent degree of BRCA1-linked genomic rearrangements. Nonetheless, we consistently found that patients with BRCAmut cancers, but not those with BRCA1meth cancers, had significantly better response outcomes when compared to those with BRCA proficient cancers. When fully promoter methylated BRCA1 PDX TNBCs were exposed to a single short course of platinum chemotherapy an unmethylated BRCA1 promoter allele emerged in resultant tumors associated with an increase in BRCA1 expression. A separate analysis of PDXs derived from treatment naive TNBCs featured complete methylation of the BRCA1 promoter, whereas those derived from post-chemotherapy TNBCs invariably had only partial methylation. PDXs with partial methylation were significantly associated with lower response rates to in vivo platinum-based therapy compared to those with complete promoter methylation. Using single cell clonal expansions from a partially BRCA1meth PDX, we confirmed that the reduced level of methylation was due to the demethylation of one of the BRCA1 promoter alleles and not to the outgrowth of a nonmethylated clone. Clinically, analysis of primary OvCas confirmed that high levels of BRCA1 methylation were significantly associated with reduced BRCA1 gene expression whereas cancers with lower levels of BRCA1 methylation had expression levels approaching those found in BRCA1 proficient cancers. These data suggest that unlike BRCAmut cancers, where HRR deficiency is achieved via mutations that are genetically 'fixed', BRCA1meth cancers are highly adaptive to genotoxin exposure and more likely to recover BRCA1 expression, which may explain their poorer therapeutic response. We further found that an increased immune transcriptional signal, especially an elevated M1 macrophage signature, is associated with enhanced response to platinum-based chemotherapy only in patients with BRCA proficient cancers, in both TNBC and OvCa cohorts underscoring the importance of characterizing molecular heterogeneity to enhance predictive precision in assigning response probabilities in TNBC and OvCa.

Clinical and molecular characteristics of ARIEL3 patients who derived exceptional benefit from rucaparib maintenance treatment for high-grade ovarian cancer (HGOC).

5537 Background: ARIEL3 is a placebo-controlled randomized trial of the PARP inhibitor (PARPi) rucaparib as maintenance treatment in HGOC patients (pts) who responded to the latest line of platinum therapy (NCT01968213). Rucaparib improved progression-free survival (PFS) across all predefined subgroups. Here, we present an exploratory analysis of clinical and molecular characteristics associated with exceptional benefit from rucaparib. Methods: Pts were randomized 2:1 to receive rucaparib 600 mg BID or placebo. At the data cutoff of Dec 31, 2019, 33/375 (9%) and 1/189 (0.5%) pts were still ongoing and receiving rucaparib or placebo, respectively. Molecular features (genomic alterations, BRCA1 promoter methylation) and baseline clinical characteristics were compared between pts who derived exceptional benefit (PFS ≥2 yrs), and those with disease progression on first scan (≈12 wks; the short-term [ST] subgroup) within each treatment arm. Results: Of 564 pts, 83 (15%) showed exceptional benefit: 79/375 (21%) in the rucaparib arm and 4/189 (2%) in the placebo arm. Within the rucaparib arm, exceptional benefit pts had more favorable clinical prognostic factors at baseline compared with the ST subgroup (Table). While BRCA mutations were enriched in the rucaparib exceptional benefit subgroup, 34/79 (43%) of these pts were BRCA wild type. Among other biomarkers, RAD51C/D mutations were associated with exceptional benefit; low genome-wide loss of heterozygosity was enriched within the ST subgroup; and high BRCA1 methylation was present at similar fractions. Trends were similar in the placebo arm (Table). Conclusions: Exceptional benefit in ARIEL3 was more common in, but not exclusive to, pts with favorable clinical characteristics and known mechanisms of PARPi sensitivity. Our results suggest that rucaparib can deliver exceptional benefit to a diverse set of HGOC pts. Clinical trial information: NCT01968213. [Table: see text]

DNA Methylation in Ovarian Cancer Susceptibility

Epigenetic alterations are somatically acquired over the lifetime and during neoplastic transformation but may also be inherited as widespread ‘constitutional’ alterations in normal tissues that can cause cancer predisposition. Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) has an established genetic susceptibility and mounting epidemiological evidence demonstrates that DNA methylation (DNAm) intermediates as well as independently contributes to risk. Targeted studies of known EOC susceptibility genes (CSGs) indicate rare, constitutional BRCA1 promoter methylation increases familial and sporadic EOC risk. Blood-based epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS) for EOC have detected a total of 2846 differentially methylated probes (DMPs) with 71 genes replicated across studies despite significant heterogeneity. While EWAS detect both symptomatic and etiologic DMPs, adjustments and analytic techniques may enrich risk associations, as evidenced by the detection of dysregulated methylation of BNC2—a known CSG identified by genome-wide associations studies (GWAS). Integrative genetic–epigenetic approaches have mapped methylation quantitative trait loci (meQTL) to EOC risk, revealing DNAm variations that are associated with nine GWAS loci and, further, one novel risk locus. Increasing efforts to mapping epigenome variation across populations and cell types will be key to decoding both the genomic and epigenomic causal pathways to EOC.

BRCA1 Promoter Methylation and Clinical Outcomes in Ovarian Cancer: An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis

Background BRCA1 methylation has been associated with homologous recombination deficiency, a biomarker of platinum sensitivity. Studies evaluating BRCA1-methylated tubal and ovarian cancer (OC) do not consistently support improved survival following platinum chemotherapy. We examine the characteristics of BRCA1-methylated OC in a meta-analysis of individual participant data. Methods Data of 2636 participants across 15 studies were analyzed. BRCA1-methylated tumors were defined according to their original study. Associations between BRCA1 methylation and clinicopathological characteristics were evaluated. The effects of methylation on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were examined using mixed-effects models. All statistical tests were 2-sided. Results 430 (16.3%) tumors were BRCA1-methylated. BRCA1 methylation was associated with younger age and advanced-stage, high-grade serous OC. There were no survival differences between BRCA1-methylated and non–BRCA1-methylated OC (median PFS = 20.0 vs 18.5 months, hazard ratio [HR] = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.87 to 1.16; P = .98; median OS = 46.6 vs 48.0 months, HR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.87 to 1.18; P = .96). Where BRCA1/2 mutations were evaluated (n = 1248), BRCA1 methylation displayed no survival advantage over BRCA1/2-intact (BRCA1/2 wild-type non–BRCA1-methylated) OC. Studies used different methods to define BRCA1 methylation. Where BRCA1 methylation was determined using methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction and gel electrophoresis (n = 834), it was associated with improved survival (PFS: HR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.66 to 0.97; P = .02; OS: HR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.63 to 1.00; P = .05) on mixed-effects modeling. Conclusion BRCA1-methylated OC displays similar clinicopathological features to BRCA1-mutated OC but is not associated with survival. Heterogeneity within BRCA1 methylation assays influences associations. Refining these assays may better identify cases with silenced BRCA1 function and improved patient outcomes.

BRCA1 Promoter Methylation Status in 1031 Primary Breast Cancers Predicts Favorable Outcomes Following Chemotherapy

Background Breast Cancer 1 gene (BRCA1) is known to be inactivated in breast tumors by promoter methylation. Tumor cells in patients carrying a germline mutation in BRCA1 are sensitive to cytotoxic drugs that cause DNA double strand breaks. However, very little is known on whether patients with BRCA1 promoter methylated tumors are similarly sensitive to cytotoxic drugs. In this study, we address this by making use of extensive follow-up data on patients treated with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in Iceland between 1976 and 2007. Methods We analyzed BRCA1 promoter methylation by pyrosequencing DNA from tumor samples from 1031 patients with primary breast cancer. Of those, 965 were sporadic cases, 61 were BRCA2, and five were BRCA1 germline mutation carriers. All cases were examined with respect to clinicopathological parameters and breast cancer–specific survival in patients treated with cytotoxic drugs. Information on chemotherapy treatment in noncarriers was available for 26 BRCA1 methylated tumors and 857 unmethylated tumors. Results BRCA1 was promoter methylated in 29 sporadic tumors or in 3.0% of cases (29 of 965), whereas none of the tumors derived from BRCA germline mutation carriers were promoter methylated. Important to note, patients with BRCA1 promoter methylation receiving chemotherapeutic drug treatment show highly improved breast cancer–specific survival compared with unmethylated controls (hazard ratio = 0.10, 95% confidence interval = 0.01 to 0.75, two-sided P = .02). Conclusions BRCA1 promoter methylation is predictive of improved disease outcome in patients receiving cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil drug treatment. Our results support the use of markers indicative of “BRCAness” in sporadic breast cancers to identify patients that are likely to benefit from the use of DNA-damaging agents.