Health-Care Associated Pneumonia (HCAP): Identification of Low and High-Risk Patients

2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 241-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Abisheganaden ◽  
Yew Ding ◽  
Wai Chong ◽  
Bee Heng ◽  
Akash Verma ◽  
...  
Curationis ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
T.M.M. Maja ◽  
M.J. Motshudi

Protection of health care workers including students from being infected when caring for high risk patients is a major cause for concern to all promoting occupational health. Safety of every employee is mandatory. Furthermore, universal guidelines for precautions must be used by all interacting with high risk patients and clients to protect themselves and prevent the spread of infection. The aim of this paper was to ascertain the availability of universal guidelines for precautions against the spread of infection in clinical settings and determine the precautions used by OHN students during their clinical placements. To realise these objectives, a quantitative and descriptive design was followed. A purposive sampling method was used to select 45 Occupational health nursing students who participated in the study.Data was collected with the use of a structured questionnaire and the results revealed that: most units where OHN students were placed for clinical experience had guidelines for universal precautions although these were not always accessible to them; regarding compliance to universal precautions, OHN students were reportedly aware of the hazards of failure to comply although in some emergencies and where personal protective material was not available, they had to provide care without using protective equipments. Recommendations made include that employers and staff at all occupational settings must ensure that updated guidelines for universal precautions are available and accessible to every body interacting with high risk patients; health care providers and students must be fully informed about and should always adhere to universal precautions.


2016 ◽  
Vol 181 (11) ◽  
pp. e1464-e1469 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brook Watts ◽  
Renée H. Lawrence ◽  
Kimberley Schaub ◽  
Erin Lea ◽  
Mary Hasenstaub ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (7) ◽  
pp. 1170-1179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jared D. Ament ◽  
Bart Thaci ◽  
Zhuo Yang ◽  
Adisa Kursumovic ◽  
Richard Bostelmann ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Nasim Alamdari ◽  
Nicholas MacKinnon ◽  
Fartash Vasefi ◽  
Reza Fazel-Rezai ◽  
Minhal Alhashim ◽  
...  

In 2016, more than 76,380 new melanoma cases were diagnosed and 10,130 people were expected to die from skin cancer in the United States (one death per hour) [1]. A recent study demonstrates that the economic burden of skin cancer treatment is substantial and, in the United States, the cost was increased from $3.6 billion in 2002–2006 to $8.1 billion in 2007–2011 [2]. Monitoring moderate and high-risk patients and identifying melanoma in the earliest stage of disease should save lives and greatly diminish the cost of treatment. In this project, we are focused on detection and monitoring of new potential melanoma sites with medium/high risk patients. We believe those patients have a serious need and they need to be motivated to be engaged in their treatment plan. High-risk patients are more likely to be engaged with their skin health and their health care providers (physicians). Considering the high morbidity and mortality of melanoma, these patients are motivated to spend money on low-cost mobile device technology, either from their own pocket or through their health care provider if it helps reduce their risk with early detection and treatment. We believe that there is a role for mobile device imaging tools in the management of melanoma risk, if they are based on clinically validated technology that supports the existing needs of patients and the health care system. In a study issued in the British Journal of Dermatology [2] of 39 melanoma apps [2], five requested to do risk assessment, while nine mentioned images for expert review. The rest fell into the documentation and education categories. This seems like to be reliable with other dermatology apps available on the market. In a study at University of Pittsburgh [3], Ferris et al. established 4 apps with 188 clinically validated skin lesions images. From images, 60 of them were melanomas. Three of four apps tested misclassified +30% of melanomas as benign. The fourth app was more accurate and it depended on dermatologist interpretation. These results raise questions about proper use of smartphones in diagnosis and treatment of the patients and how dermatologists can effectively involve with these tools. In this study, we used a MATLAB (The MathWorks Inc., Natick, MA) based image processing algorithm that uses an RGB color dermoscopy image as an input and classifies malignant melanoma versus benign lesions based on prior training data using the AdaBoost classifier [5]. We compared the classifier accuracy when lesion boundaries are detected using supervised and unsupervised segmentation. We have found that improving the lesion boundary detection accuracy provides significant improvement on melanoma classification outcome in the patient data.


2020 ◽  
Vol 212 (11) ◽  
pp. 510
Author(s):  
Leon J Worth ◽  
Simon J Harrison ◽  
Michael Dickinson ◽  
Annaliese Diemen ◽  
Jennifer Breen ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 120 (5) ◽  
pp. A376-A376
Author(s):  
B JEETSANDHU ◽  
R JAIN ◽  
J SINGH ◽  
M JAIN ◽  
J SHARMA ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document