Drug Abuse and the Schools

1971 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 171-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerrold S. Greenberg
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Drug Abuse ◽  
Background Information ◽  
Drug Education ◽  
Programming Students

In reviewing some of the background information regarding the extent of drug abuse and the types of measures presently being used, this article describes in more detail the role of the school in drug abuse. It is the contention of this writer that the school cannot be effective in this area unless its role is clearly defined. Such factors as the teacher, the school, decision-making, law-enforcing and motivation are, among others, briefly discussed. Emphasis is placed on drug education from the viewpoint of youth, whereby the objectives should relate to students' use or abuse of drugs and not in programming students to behave in a predetermined manner (determined by those, other than students). In addition, the school's relationship and the responsibilities of other institutions within the society are identified and reviewed.

Education about Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs—A Challenge to Our Schools

1971 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 177-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seymour Eiseman
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Drug Abuse ◽  
Health Education ◽  
Education Program ◽  
Instructional Program ◽  
The Other ◽  
Drug Education ◽  
Curriculum Framework ◽  
Dynamic Programs

The author describes the most serious problem of drug abuse in the nation's schools. He attempts to describe the role of the school and its responsibility as a preventive agent or deterrent to youthful drug abuse. The epidemic proportions of drug abuse in our schools could be effectively diminished with the necessary ingredients for successful results. These ingredients should include such items as thought, inquiry, analysis, evaluation and decision-making. The writer further describes how health education classes with realistic and dynamic programs of instruction can also serve as effective deterrents to youthful drug abuse. He further describes a method in which the other disciplines that make up the instructional program of a school can reinforce the health and drug education program, thus building up a total educational thrust within the existing curriculum framework.

Decision-Making—A Key to Prevention of Drug Abuse

1972 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 383-389 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernard Pollack
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Drug Abuse ◽  
Abuse Prevention ◽  
Drug Abuse Prevention ◽  
Social Pressures ◽  
The Social

This article focuses upon the role of decision-making in the schools as a vehicle for drug abuse prevention. Decision-making is examined as a process that may be structured to make learning more meaningful and at the same time gives youngsters the skills and resources necessary to face up to the social pressures involved in the spread of drug abuse. Teachers are encouraged in the classroom to stimulate students to develop, design, and plan independent approaches to problems.

Prescription for Drug Abuse Education Managing the Mood Changers

1971 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 101-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stanley F. Yolles
Keyword(s):  
Drug Abuse ◽  
Drug Use ◽  
Drug Information ◽  
Learning Experiences ◽  
Educational Programs ◽  
Background Information ◽  
Drug Education ◽  
The Way

This article emphasizes the need to prepare youth to make decisions about drug use. To do this it is essential to eliminate hypocrisy about the use of marijuana, to “infuse” the curriculum with drug information and to provide students with realistic learning experiences. It focuses on such things as the way teachers have been charged with the responsibility to teach about drugs without adequate preparation. The author provides the reader with some practical suggestions and solutions to the dilemma. He presents factual background information about the nature of marijuana, the scope of the problem, and the need for immediate action regarding relevant educational programs. The key areas discussed are: 1) understanding the problem, 2) scope of the problem, 3) the need for drug education, 4) education of professional personnel, and 5) alternatives to drug abuse.

Issues Related to Drug Abuse in College Athletics: Athletes at Risk

1989 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 155-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ray Tricker ◽  
David L. Cook ◽  
Rick McGuire
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
Drug Abuse ◽  
Drug Testing ◽  
College Athletics ◽  
Elite Athletes ◽  
Drug Education ◽  
Drug Abuse Prevention ◽  
Athletic Leadership ◽  
Sport Psychologist

In recent years drug abuse by college athletes has received greater attention. Because of the recognition of the growing problem of drug use in athletics, the new NCAA drug testing policy, and recent deaths of elite athletes, the sport psychologist should be prepared to deal with this issue. In many college settings the sport psychologist may be expected to provide support with counseling or participate in the development of a drug abuse prevention program for student athletes. Therefore sport psychologists need to closely examine the factors that may predispose athletes toward using drugs, understand the role of prevention, and develop a thorough knowledge of positive, viable alternatives to drugs. This article addresses five important issues that relate to drug abuse in college athletics: (a) why athletes are at risk, (b) athletic leadership and its relationship to substance abuse, (c) the role of the sport psychologist, (d) issues related to the effectiveness of drug education for athletes, and (e) recommendations for athlete drug education programs.

Drug Education and the College Athlete: Evaluation of a Decision-Making Model

1996 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 159-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raymond Tricker ◽  
Declan Connolly
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Drug Abuse ◽  
College Student ◽  
Drug Use ◽  
Student Athletes ◽  
Prevention Programs ◽  
Drug Education ◽  
State University ◽  
Oregon State University ◽  
College Student Athletes

In general there is a lack of information describing the components and structure of drug education and prevention programs (DEPP) for college student athletes. While concern about the prevalence of drug abuse among college student athletes has increased, a relative lack of clarity remains regarding what elements of drug education prevention programs have been successful or unsuccessful in this setting. In an effort to address this issue at Oregon State University a two-credit ten-week DEPP was implemented as a requirement for all collegiate athletes. This article describes the evaluation of this program. Altogether 635 student athletes from three National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division One universities provided data in this two-year evaluation project. Participants were student athletes from Oregon State University (OSU), a Mid-Western University (MWU), and another Pacific North-Western University (PNWU). Pre- and post-test data were collected regarding knowledge about drugs, attitudes toward drug use, drug use, and decision-making factors. Students at OSU and MWU were enrolled in a structured DEPP, and the third group from PNWU was used as a control and did not receive regular instruction. The baseline data taken before the drug education course indicated that athletes at OSU, MWU, and PNWU were no different in their knowledge of drugs, attitudes toward drugs, or perception of the value of drug education in preventing drug abuse among student athletes. However, the data at the end of the ten-week course revealed many significant improvements among OSU and MWU students athletes, in knowledge, attitude related to performance enhancing drugs and recreational drugs, and perceptions of drug education. At the end of the course 88 percent of the participating OSU athletes agreed that drug education can be effective in preventing drug abuse among student athletes.

Elaborating the role of reflection and individual differences in the study of folk-economic beliefs

2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Arceneaux
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Individual Differences ◽  
Cognitive Processes ◽  
Evolutionary History ◽  
Behavioral Responses ◽  
History Of ◽  
Economic Beliefs

AbstractIntuitions guide decision-making, and looking to the evolutionary history of humans illuminates why some behavioral responses are more intuitive than others. Yet a place remains for cognitive processes to second-guess intuitive responses – that is, to be reflective – and individual differences abound in automatic, intuitive processing as well.

The Role of Shared Decision-Making in Audiologic Rehabilitation

2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen Pryce ◽  
Amanda Hall
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
Behavior Changes ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Treatment Information ◽  
Centered Care ◽  
Potential Risks ◽  
Audiologic Rehabilitation

Shared decision-making (SDM), a component of patient-centered care, is the process in which the clinician and patient both participate in decision-making about treatment; information is shared between the parties and both agree with the decision. Shared decision-making is appropriate for health care conditions in which there is more than one evidence-based treatment or management option that have different benefits and risks. The patient's involvement ensures that the decisions regarding treatment are sensitive to the patient's values and preferences. Audiologic rehabilitation requires substantial behavior changes on the part of patients and includes benefits to their communication as well as compromises and potential risks. This article identifies the importance of shared decision-making in audiologic rehabilitation and the changes required to implement it effectively.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document