Community Health Education Literature from the Seventies: A Field Practitioner Survey

1984 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 367-389
Author(s):  
Ted T. L. Chen ◽  
George P. Cernada

A national sample of community health education practitioners in the United States was surveyed by mail and asked to select five articles published during the 1970's they would recommend that their colleagues read. The study was conducted in late 1979 after a comparable national survey of university health education faculty by Cernada and Chen ( International Quarterly of Community Health Education, 1:2 and 2:1). The recommended readings were collected and abstracted, and are presented in annotated bibliographic form. A comparison of practitioner and academic selections is in preparation.

1984 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 149-166
Author(s):  
Ted T. L. Chen ◽  
George P. Cernada

A national sample of community health education practitioners in the United States was surveyed by mail and asked to select five articles published during the 1970's that they would recommend their colleagues read. The study was conducted in late 1979 after a comparable national survey of university health education faculty by Cernada and Chen (International Quarterly of Community Health Education, 1:2 and 2:1). The recommended readings were collected and abstracted, and are presented in annotated bibliographic form. This annotated bibliography follows up on the collection published in Volume 4, Number 4, of the International Quarterly of Community Health Education which covered Community Health Education Policy, Theory, and Social Issues-its focus is on Applied Research, Evaluation, and Case Studies.


1992 ◽  
Vol 62 (9) ◽  
pp. 421-427 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah Holtzman ◽  
Brenda Z. Greene ◽  
Gwendolen C. Ingraham ◽  
Lisa A. Daily ◽  
David G. Demchuk ◽  
...  

1981 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 195-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
George P. Cernada ◽  
Ted T. L. Chen

Faculty teaching in accredited graduate programs of community health education in U.S. universities were surveyed by mail to determine which articles published during the 1970's they would recommend that their colleagues read. The suggested readings were collected and abstracted and are presented herewith in annotated bibliographic form. The second phase of the study, a comparable survey of field practitioners, is being analyzed for a future issue of the journal.


Author(s):  
Christopher S. Koper ◽  
Cynthia Lum ◽  
Xiaoyun Wu ◽  
Noah Fritz

PurposeTo measure the practice and management of proactive policing in local American police agencies and assess them in comparison to recommendations of the National Academies of Sciences (NAS) Committee on Proactive Policing.Design/methodology/approachA survey was conducted with a national sample of American police agencies having 100 or more sworn officers to obtain detailed information about the types of proactive work that officers engage in, to quantify their proactive work and to understand how the agencies measure and manage those activities. Responding agencies (n = 180) were geographically diverse and served populations of approximately half a million persons on average.FindingsProactivity as practiced is much more limited in scope than what the NAS envisions. Most agencies track only a few forms of proactivity and cannot readily estimate how much uncommitted time officers have available for proactive work. Measured proactivity is mostly limited to traffic stops, business and property checks and some form of directed or general preventive patrol. Many agencies have no formal policy in place to define or guide proactive activities, nor do they evaluate officer performance on proactivity with a detailed and deliberate rubric.Originality/valueThis is the first national survey that attempts to quantify proactive policing as practiced broadly in the United States. It provides context to the NAS recommendations and provides knowledge about the gap between practice and those recommendations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document