scholarly journals Research Output and International Cooperation Among Countries During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Scientometric Analysis (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadja Grammes ◽  
Dominic Millenaar ◽  
Tobias Fehlmann ◽  
Fabian Kern ◽  
Michael Böhm ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
United Kingdom ◽  
Web Application ◽  
Research Output ◽  
Large Data ◽  
The United States ◽  
Scientific Output ◽  
Scientometric Analysis ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
Collaborative Efforts

BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic, caused by the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, has instigated immediate and massive worldwide research efforts. Rapid publication of research data may be desirable but also carries the risk of quality loss. OBJECTIVE This analysis aimed to correlate the severity of the COVID-19 outbreak with its related scientific output per country. METHODS All articles related to the COVID-19 pandemic were retrieved from Web of Science and analyzed using the web application SciPE (science performance evaluation), allowing for large data scientometric analyses of the global geographical distribution of scientific output. RESULTS A total of 7185 publications, including 2592 articles, 2091 editorial materials, 2528 early access papers, 1479 letters, 633 reviews, and other contributions were extracted. The top 3 countries involved in COVID-19 research were the United States, China, and Italy. The confirmed COVID-19 cases or deaths per region correlated with scientific research output. The United States was most active in terms of collaborative efforts, sharing a significant amount of manuscript authorships with the United Kingdom, China, and Italy. The United States was China’s most frequent collaborative partner, followed by the United Kingdom. CONCLUSIONS The COVID-19 research landscape is rapidly developing and is driven by countries with a generally strong prepandemic research output but is also significantly affected by countries with a high prevalence of COVID-19 cases. Our findings indicate that the United States is leading international collaborative efforts. CLINICALTRIAL

scholarly journals Research Output and International Cooperation Among Countries During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Scientometric Analysis

10.2196/24514 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (12) ◽  
pp. e24514
Author(s):  
Nadja Grammes ◽  
Dominic Millenaar ◽  
Tobias Fehlmann ◽  
Fabian Kern ◽  
Michael Böhm ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
United Kingdom ◽  
Web Application ◽  
Research Output ◽  
Large Data ◽  
The United States ◽  
Scientific Output ◽  
Scientometric Analysis ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
Collaborative Efforts

Background The COVID-19 pandemic, caused by the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, has instigated immediate and massive worldwide research efforts. Rapid publication of research data may be desirable but also carries the risk of quality loss. Objective This analysis aimed to correlate the severity of the COVID-19 outbreak with its related scientific output per country. Methods All articles related to the COVID-19 pandemic were retrieved from Web of Science and analyzed using the web application SciPE (science performance evaluation), allowing for large data scientometric analyses of the global geographical distribution of scientific output. Results A total of 7185 publications, including 2592 articles, 2091 editorial materials, 2528 early access papers, 1479 letters, 633 reviews, and other contributions were extracted. The top 3 countries involved in COVID-19 research were the United States, China, and Italy. The confirmed COVID-19 cases or deaths per region correlated with scientific research output. The United States was most active in terms of collaborative efforts, sharing a significant amount of manuscript authorships with the United Kingdom, China, and Italy. The United States was China’s most frequent collaborative partner, followed by the United Kingdom. Conclusions The COVID-19 research landscape is rapidly developing and is driven by countries with a generally strong prepandemic research output but is also significantly affected by countries with a high prevalence of COVID-19 cases. Our findings indicate that the United States is leading international collaborative efforts.

scholarly journals Research output on primary care in Australia, Canada, Germany, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United States: bibliometric analysis

BMJ ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 342 (mar08 2) ◽  
pp. d1028-d1028 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Glanville ◽  
T. Kendrick ◽  
R. McNally ◽  
J. Campbell ◽  
F. R. Hobbs
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
United Kingdom ◽  
The Netherlands ◽  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Research Output ◽  
The United States ◽  
The United Kingdom

A PubMed-Based Exploration of the Course of Yoga Research from 1948 to 2020

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dipak Chetry ◽  
Shirley Telles ◽  
Acharya Balkrishna
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
United Kingdom ◽  
Research Output ◽  
Publishing Research ◽  
The United States ◽  
Time Frame ◽  
Health Conditions ◽  
Future Research ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
Meta Analyses

Yoga research citations from 1948 to 2020 in PubMed were filtered and sorted in 10-year intervals to explore the occurrence and time frame of change in (1) the focus of research; (2) the number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), systematic reviews (SRs), and meta-analyses (MAs); (3) health conditions researched for yoga as therapy; (4) journals with yoga research; and (5) the research on yoga from different countries. Publications on yoga between 1948 and 1970 (1.25%) focused on exceptional abilities of experienced yoga practitioners, apparently related to the spiritual goal of yoga; from 1971 to 2000 (6.87%), the focus was on yoga in health and therapy; and from 2001 to 2020 (91.88%), research publications on yoga increased and continued to focus on health and therapy, with fewer RCTs relative to the SRs and MAs on yoga in PubMed. Publications on yoga reported the following health conditions most often: from 1981 to 1990, (1) asthma, (2) stress, and (3) diabetes; from 1991 to 2000, (1) stress followed by (2) asthma, anxiety, and pain (all three with equal percentages); from 2001 to 2010, (1) depression, (2) stress, and (3) anxiety; and from 2011 to 2020, (1) stress, (2) depression, and (3) pain. The journals publishing research on yoga in PubMed have changed between 1971 and 2020 as follows: highly clinically relevant, broad-interest medical journals (1971 to 1990); journals relevant to mind-body interventions (1991 to 2000); and specialized journals for complementary and alternative medicine, particular branches of medicine, or research study designs (2001 to 2020). The highest yoga research output from 1971 to 1980 came from the United Kingdom (RCTs); from 1981 to 1990 the most research came from the United States (RCTs); from 1991 to 2000 the most research came from India (RCTs) and the United Kingdom (SRs); from 2001 to 2010 the most research came from the United States (RCTs, SRs) and the United Kingdom (MAs); and from 2011 to 2020 the most research came from the United States (RCTs, SRs, MAs). The trends in yoga research from this analysis reflect increased research related to yoga and health while suggesting areas for future research based on the strengths and gaps that have emerged.

scholarly journals International authorship and collaboration across bioRxiv preprints

eLife ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard J Abdill ◽  
Elizabeth M Adamowicz ◽  
Ran Blekhman
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
United Kingdom ◽  
Life Sciences ◽  
The United States ◽  
Scientific Output ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
The Us ◽  
International Collaborations ◽  
Disproportionate Number

Preprints are becoming well established in the life sciences, but relatively little is known about the demographics of the researchers who post preprints and those who do not, or about the collaborations between preprint authors. Here, based on an analysis of 67,885 preprints posted on bioRxiv, we find that some countries, notably the United States and the United Kingdom, are overrepresented on bioRxiv relative to their overall scientific output, while other countries (including China, Russia, and Turkey) show lower levels of bioRxiv adoption. We also describe a set of ‘contributor countries’ (including Uganda, Croatia and Thailand): researchers from these countries appear almost exclusively as non-senior authors on international collaborations. Lastly, we find multiple journals that publish a disproportionate number of preprints from some countries, a dynamic that almost always benefits manuscripts from the US.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document