Assessing the quality of online health information about breast cancer from Chinese-language websites (Preprint)

BACKGROUND In China, the Internet has become one of the most important ways to obtain information about breast cancer. However, quantitative evaluations of the quality of Chinese health websites and the breast cancer treatment information they publish are lacking. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate the quality of Chinese breast cancer websites and the value, suitability and accuracy of the breast cancer treatment information they publish. METHODS As the research objects, Chinese breast cancer health websites were searched and manually screened according to their Alexa and BaiduTM search engine rankings. For each site included in the survey, conducted April 8, 2019, three recently published articles that met the inclusion criteria were selected as samples to evaluate the quality of online breast cancer treatment information. Three raters assessed all materials using the LIDA, DISCERN, and SAM instruments and the Michigan Checklist. Data analysis was completed with SPSS 20.0 and Excel 2010. RESULTS This survey included 20 Chinese breast cancer websites and 60 articles on breast cancer treatment. The average LIDA score for the sites was 54.85 (SD 3.498). For the online breast cancer treatment articles, regarding value, the scores were generally low. Regarding suitability, 32 (53.33%) articles were evaluated as presenting unsuitable material. Regarding accuracy, the problems were that the articles were not original (44 articles, 73%) and lacked references (46 articles, 77%). CONCLUSIONS The quality of Chinese breast cancer websites is generally good. However, the colour collocation, text setting and language design should be improved. The quality of Chinese online breast cancer treatment information is poor; the information has little value to users, and pictorial information is scarcely used. The online breast cancer treatment information is accurate but lacks originality and references.

Download Full-text

The impact of lymphedema on health-related quality of life up to 10 years after breast cancer treatment

npj Breast Cancer ◽

10.1038/s41523-021-00276-y ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 7 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Mads G. Jørgensen ◽

Navid M. Toyserkani ◽

Frederik G. Hansen ◽

Anette Bygum ◽

Jens A. Sørensen

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Quality Of Life ◽

Cancer Treatment ◽

Breast Cancer Treatment ◽

Health Related Quality ◽

Related Quality ◽

Health Related ◽

The Impact

AbstractThe impact of breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) on long-term quality of life is unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of BCRL on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) up to 10 years after breast cancer treatment. This regional population-based study enrolled patients treated for breast cancer with axillary lymph node dissection between January 1st 2007 and December 31th 2017. Follow up and assessments of the included patients were conducted between January 2019 and May 2020. The study outcome was HRQoL, evaluated with the Lymphedema Functioning, Disability and Health Questionnaire, the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire and the Short Form (36) Health Survey Questionnaire. Multivariate linear logistic regression models adjusted for confounders provided mean score differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals in each HRQoL scale and item. This study enrolled 244 patients with BCRL and 823 patients without BCRL. Patients with BCRL had significantly poorer HRQoL than patients without BCRL in 16 out of 18 HRQoL subscales, for example, in physical function (MDs 27, 95%CI: 24; 30), mental health (MDs 24, 95%CI: 21; 27) and social role functioning (MDs 20, 95%CI: 17; 23). Age, BMI, BCRL severity, hand and dominant arm affection had only minor impact on HRQoL (MDs < 5), suggesting a high degree of inter-individual variation in coping with lymphedema. This study showed that BCRL is associated with long-term impairments in HRQoL, especially affecting the physical and psychosocial domains. Surprisingly, BCRL diagnosis rather than clinical severity drove the largest impairments in HRQoL.

Download Full-text

Improving the quality of life of patients with breast cancer-related lymphoedema by lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA): study protocol of a multicentre randomised controlled trial

BMJ Open ◽

10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035337 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 10 (1) ◽

pp. e035337 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Joost Wolfs ◽

Jop Beugels ◽

Merel Kimman ◽

Andrzej A Piatkowski de Grzymala ◽

Esther Heuts ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Quality Of Life ◽

Lymph Node ◽

Randomised Controlled Trial ◽

Conservative Treatment ◽

Cancer Treatment ◽

Controlled Trial ◽

Breast Cancer Treatment ◽

Randomised Controlled

IntroductionEarly breast cancer detection and advancements in treatment options have resulted in an increase of breast cancer survivors. An increasing number of women are living with the long-term effects of breast cancer treatment, making the quality of survivorship an increasingly important goal. Breast cancer-related lymphoedema (BCRL) is one of the most underestimated complications of breast cancer treatment with a reported incidence of 20%. A microsurgical technique called lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) might be a promising treatment modality for patients with BCRL. The main objective is to assess whether LVA is more effective than the current standard therapy (conservative treatment) in terms of improvement in quality of life and weather it is cost-effective.Methods and analysisA multicentre, randomised controlled trial, carried out in two academic and two community hospitals in the Netherlands. The study population includes 120 women over the age of 18 who have undergone treatment for breast cancer including axillary treatment (sentinel lymph node biopsy or axillary lymph node dissection) and/or axillary radiotherapy, presenting with an early stage lymphoedema of the arm, viable lymphatic vessels and received at least 3 months conservative treatment. Sixty participants will undergo the LVA operation and the other sixty will continue their regular conservative treatment, both with a follow-up of 24 months. The primary outcome is the health-related quality of life. Secondary outcomes are societal costs, quality adjusted life years, cost-effectiveness ratio, discontinuation rate of conservative treatment and excess limb volume.Ethics and disseminationThe study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Maastricht University Medical Center (METC) on 19 December 2018 (NL67059.068.18). The results of this study will be disseminated in presentations at academic conferences, publications in peer-reviewed journals and other news media.Trial registration numberNCT02790021; Pre-results.

Download Full-text