scholarly journals The Effectiveness of PAVE Strategy on Developing University Students’ Vocabulary and Self-Efficacy

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 443
Author(s):  
Ethar A. Altwaijri
Keyword(s):  
English Language Learners ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
English Language ◽  
Learning Strategy ◽  
Vocabulary Learning ◽  
Vocabulary Test ◽  
Vocabulary Learning Strategies ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Study Participants

<p><em>The present study aimed at investigating the effectiveness of the “PAVE” vocabulary learning strategy on developing a group of students’ vocabulary and self-efficacy while studying English as a foreign language at the College of Languages and Translation, at Al-Imam Muhammad Ibn Saud Islamic University. The research sample consisted of sixteen Saudi female English language learners. A pre/post vocabulary test and a self-efficacy scale were administered to the study participants before and after the treatment. The participants were introduced to one of the vocabulary learning Strategies “PAVE strategy”, which has been used. The results provided support for the hypotheses of the study and showed that the students performed significantly better on the post administration of the vocabulary test as well as on the self-efficacy scale. Thus, it can be said that the PAVE vocabulary learning strategy had a large impact on developing students’ vocabulary and self-efficacy. The study recommended that the use of vocabulary learning strategies should be given enough attention to develop students’ vocabulary and self-efficacy.</em></p>

scholarly journals INVESTIGATING EXPERIENCED AND NOVICE ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS` PERCEPTIONS of MOST USEFUL VOCABULARY LEARNING STRATEGIES (VLS)

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 288-295
Author(s):  
Elnaz Zariholhosseini ◽  
Ehsan Namaziandost ◽  
Mehdi Nasri
Keyword(s):  
English Language Learners ◽  
Language Learning ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Language Learners ◽  
English Language ◽  
Vocabulary Learning ◽  
New Words ◽  
Novice Learners ◽  
Vocabulary Learning Strategies ◽  
Personal Use

Purpose of the study: This article report’s findings from a study on the differences and similarities between experienced and novice English language learners with regards to their personal use of VLS. Methodology: Closed questionnaire and semi-structure interviews were applied to collect the data. The questionnaire was distributed among 60 (30 experienced learners and 30 novice learners). In addition, 20 learners (10 experienced learners and 10 novice learners) were asked to answer the questions in the interview. Therefore, descriptive statistics, U Mann Whitney test, and independent-sample t-test were run to compare and analyzed the data. Main Findings: The finding showed that there were significant differences between experienced and novice learners’ thoughts towards vocabulary learning strategies and experienced learners used vocabulary learning strategies while learning new words in English language learning. Applications of this study: If the learners are taught how to use each strategy correctly, their understanding of the language can naturally be improved. Moreover, VLS is beneficial throughout the process of vocabulary learning which makes learners more independent and allows teachers to focus on other things as well. Novelty/Originality of this study: To the best of researchers’ knowledge, no study has been done on investigating Iranian experienced and novice English language learners` perceptions towards most useful vocabulary learning strategies (VLS).

scholarly journals Validation of an online questionnaire of vocabulary learning strategies for ESL learners

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yongqi Gu
Keyword(s):  
English Language Learners ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
English Language ◽  
Vocabulary Learning ◽  
Internal Consistency Reliability ◽  
Online Questionnaire ◽  
Paper Version ◽  
Response Formats ◽  
Vocabulary Learning Strategies ◽  
Esl Learners

© 2018, Adam Mickiewicz University Press. All rights reserved. This article reports on the updating and validation of a questionnaire for vocabulary learning strategies. An English as a second language (ESL) version of the Vocabulary Learning Questionnaire (VLQ), first published in Gu and Johnson (1996), was created based on its latest version. Two response formats were piloted, that is, a paper version with a 7-point Likert scale and an online version with a 100-point slider bar. A series of validation procedures resulted in a 62-item instrument which was then administered online among 682 English language learners at the tertiary level in China. The paper presents evidence of content validity, construct validity, internal consistency reliability, and predictive validity. It also provides suggestions for interpreting and using the questionnaire for both research and instructional purposes.

scholarly journals Validation of an online questionnaire of vocabulary learning strategies for ESL learners

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
PY Gu
Keyword(s):  
English Language Learners ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
English Language ◽  
Vocabulary Learning ◽  
Internal Consistency Reliability ◽  
Online Questionnaire ◽  
Paper Version ◽  
Response Formats ◽  
Vocabulary Learning Strategies ◽  
Esl Learners

© 2018, Adam Mickiewicz University Press. All rights reserved. This article reports on the updating and validation of a questionnaire for vocabulary learning strategies. An English as a second language (ESL) version of the Vocabulary Learning Questionnaire (VLQ), first published in Gu and Johnson (1996), was created based on its latest version. Two response formats were piloted, that is, a paper version with a 7-point Likert scale and an online version with a 100-point slider bar. A series of validation procedures resulted in a 62-item instrument which was then administered online among 682 English language learners at the tertiary level in China. The paper presents evidence of content validity, construct validity, internal consistency reliability, and predictive validity. It also provides suggestions for interpreting and using the questionnaire for both research and instructional purposes.

scholarly journals Validation of an online questionnaire of vocabulary learning strategies for ESL learners

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 325-350 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Yongqi Gu
Keyword(s):  
English Language Learners ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
English Language ◽  
Vocabulary Learning ◽  
Internal Consistency Reliability ◽  
Online Questionnaire ◽  
Paper Version ◽  
Response Formats ◽  
Vocabulary Learning Strategies ◽  
Esl Learners

This article reports on the updating and validation of a questionnaire for vocabulary learning strategies. An English as a second language (ESL) version of the Vocabulary Learning Questionnaire (VLQ), first published in Gu and Johnson (1996), was created based on its latest version. Two response formats were piloted, that is, a paper version with a 7-point Likert scale and an online version with a 100-point slider bar. A series of validation procedures resulted in a 62-item instrument which was then administered online among 682 English language learners at the tertiary level in China. The paper presents evidence of content validity, construct validity, internal consistency reliability, and predictive validity. It also provides suggestions for interpreting and using the questionnaire for both research and instructional purposes.

scholarly journals Validation of an online questionnaire of vocabulary learning strategies for ESL learners

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yongqi Gu
Keyword(s):  
English Language Learners ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
English Language ◽  
Vocabulary Learning ◽  
Internal Consistency Reliability ◽  
Online Questionnaire ◽  
Paper Version ◽  
Response Formats ◽  
Vocabulary Learning Strategies ◽  
Esl Learners

© 2018, Adam Mickiewicz University Press. All rights reserved. This article reports on the updating and validation of a questionnaire for vocabulary learning strategies. An English as a second language (ESL) version of the Vocabulary Learning Questionnaire (VLQ), first published in Gu and Johnson (1996), was created based on its latest version. Two response formats were piloted, that is, a paper version with a 7-point Likert scale and an online version with a 100-point slider bar. A series of validation procedures resulted in a 62-item instrument which was then administered online among 682 English language learners at the tertiary level in China. The paper presents evidence of content validity, construct validity, internal consistency reliability, and predictive validity. It also provides suggestions for interpreting and using the questionnaire for both research and instructional purposes.

The Relationship Between Personality Traits and Vocabulary Learning Strategies

2021 ◽  
pp. 98-108
Author(s):  
Zeinab Jalili Kelangestani
Keyword(s):  
English Language Learners ◽  
Personality Traits ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
English Language ◽  
Vocabulary Learning ◽  
Personality Types ◽  
Efl Learners ◽  
Social Strategy ◽  
Vocabulary Learning Strategies ◽  
The Relationship

This study examined the possible relationship between Iranian female intermediate EFL learners' personality traits and their vocabulary learning strategies. The participants in this study comprised of 90 female intermediate English language learners. To ensure the homogeneity of the group, all the participants were made to appear in the Oxford Solution Placement Test. Vocabulary Learning Strategies and Eysenck Personality questionnaires were administered to the participants. The results showed that there was no statistically significant relationship between Iranian intermediate EFL learners' personality type and their use of vocabulary learning strategies. However, it appeared that introverts tended to have higher use of memory, cognitive, and metacognitive strategies while extroverts were found to achieve higher mean scores on determination and social strategies. The highest degree of the relationship was found between social strategy and personality types. In contrast, lowest correlation was found between metacognitive strategy and personality types.

scholarly journals The Effect of Strategy Training on Vocabulary Learning of EFL University Students

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 284-295
Author(s):  
Salma Seffar
Keyword(s):  
University Students ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
English Language ◽  
Learning Strategy ◽  
Vocabulary Learning ◽  
Learning Ability ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Vocabulary Learning Strategies ◽  
Language Courses ◽  
Experimental Group

This study investigated the effect of training in five vocabulary learning strategies (VLS) on the vocabulary learning of EFL university students. The five vocabulary learning strategies were ‘Dictionary Work’, ‘Word Cards’, ‘Semantic Mapping’, ‘Word Parts’, and ‘Guessing from Context’. Forty-eight first year university students, in both the control group (24 students receiving English language courses) and the experimental group (24 students receiving English language courses besides VLS training) belonging to similar proficiency and vocabulary size levels, participated in the study. Data were collected utilizing two research instruments namely a vocabulary learning strategy questionnaire, pre-and post-tests of vocabulary learning ability. The vocabulary learning strategy questionnaire was used to elicit what types of vocabulary learning strategies the subjects employed while they learned and memorized the vocabulary taught independently outside and inside the class. The pre-test was employed to determine pre-existing knowledge of the participants. The posttest was administered to identify the impact of vocabulary learning strategy instruction on the students’ vocabulary knowledge. Descriptive statistics and t-test showed that after introducing vocabulary learning strategies training (VLST) in class, subjects from the experimental group used more VLS and significantly outperformed subjects of the control group in their ability to learn new words.

Vocabulary Learning Strategy Use by Iranian EFL Learners across Proficiency Levels

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 67
Author(s):  
Mohammad Davoudi ◽  
Milad Chavosh
Keyword(s):  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Language Learners ◽  
Language Proficiency ◽  
English Language ◽  
Learning Strategy ◽  
Vocabulary Learning ◽  
Advanced Learners ◽  
Intermediate Language ◽  
Advanced Students ◽  
Vocabulary Learning Strategies

<p>Given the importance of vocabulary as well as vocabulary learning strategies in the context of ELT, the present study sought to investigate the vocabulary learning strategies employed by Iranian intermediate and advanced learners. Several English language institutes in Yazd cooperated with the researchers by providing them with a list of intermediate to advanced learners. After arrangement with institutes’ administrators and getting students’ consent to participate in the study, students took a TOEFL and based on the obtained scores, 55 learners were chosen as intermediate and 50 as advanced students. Participants with TOEFL score range of 481-506 were classified as intermediate and those with TOEFL range of 507-600 were classified as advanced students (Phillips, 1991). Next, students completed VOLSI by choosing one of the options (1) never, (2) seldom, (3) sometimes, (4) often, and (5) always. The results of statistical analyses revealed that both advanced and intermediate language learners used mental linkages, memory strategies and auditory strategies as the most frequent vocabulary learning strategies respectively. On the other hand, both advanced and intermediate language learners used strategies for self-motivation, strategies involving authentic language, and strategies involving creative activities as the least frequent. It was also found that advanced and intermediate language learners were significantly different from each other in all categories of vocabulary learning strategies except strategies involving creative activities. Moreover, Iranian language learners with different levels of language proficiency used vocabulary learning strategies with varying frequency of use. </p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document