Upfront cytoreductive surgery versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer in Indian patients

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mukur Dipi Ray ◽  
Suryanarayana S.V. Deo ◽  
Lalit Kumar ◽  
Manish Kumar Gaur
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Ovarian Carcinoma ◽  
Cytoreductive Surgery ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Advanced Stages ◽  
Selection For ◽  
Selection Of Patients ◽  
Selection Of

In cases of ovarian carcinoma, primary cytoreductive surgery (CRS) is the standard treatment up to stage IIIB, but patient selection for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in selected cases is controversial. A total of 200 patients with advanced ovarian cancer were analyzed retrospectively, according to specific selection criteria. Primary CRS was performed in 95 patients (47.5%) and interval CRS after 3–6 cycles of NACT was performed in 105 patients (52.5%). After median follow-up of 35 months, 5-year overall survival was 53.7% in the upfront CRS group and 42.2% in the NACT group. Primary CRS is the standard in advanced stages of ovarian carcinoma, but in certain subset of patients, NACT is preferred. Identifying that group is challenging but feasible. Proper selection of patients is key to successful outcomes.

TRUST: Trial of Radical Upfront Surgical Therapy in advanced ovarian cancer (ENGOT ov33/AGO‐OVAR OP7)

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (8) ◽  
pp. 1327-1331 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Reuss ◽  
Andreas du Bois ◽  
Philipp Harter ◽  
Christina Fotopoulou ◽  
Jalid Sehouli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Cytoreductive Surgery ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Figo Stage ◽  
Complete Resection ◽  
Peritoneal Carcinoma ◽  
Exclusion Criteria ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy

BackgroundPrimary cytoreductive surgery followed by chemotherapy has been considered standard management for patients with advanced ovarian cancer over decades. An alternative approach of interval debulking surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy was subsequently reported by two randomized phase III trials (EORTC‐GCG, CHORUS), which were criticized owing to important limitations, especially regarding the rate of complete resection.Primary ObjectiveTo clarify the optimal timing of surgical therapy in advanced ovarian cancer.Study HypothesisPrimary cytoreductive surgery is superior to interval cytoreductive surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for overall survival in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.Trial DesignTRUST is an international open, randomized, controlled multi-center trial investigating overall survival after primary cytoreductive surgery versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy and subsequent interval cytoreductive surgery in patients with FIGO stage IIIB–IVB ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal carcinoma. To guarantee adequate surgical quality, participating centers need to fulfill specific quality assurance criteria (eg, ≥50% complete resection rate in upfront surgery for FIGO IIIB–IVB patients, ≥36 debulking-surgeries/year) and agree to independent audits by TRUST quality committee delegates. Patients in the primary cytoreductive surgery arm undergo surgery followed by 6 cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy, whereas patients in the interval cytoreductive surgery arm undergo 3 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy after histologic confirmation of the disease, followed by interval cytoreductive surgery and subsequently, 3 cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy. The intention of surgery for both groups is complete tumor resection according to guideline recommendations.Major Inclusion/Exclusion CriteriaMajor inclusion criteria are suspected or histologically confirmed, newly diagnosed invasive epithelial ovarian cancer, fallopian tube carcinoma, or primary peritoneal carcinoma FIGO stage IIIB–IVB (IV only if resectable metastasis). Major exclusion criteria are non-epithelial ovarian malignancies and borderline tumors; prior chemotherapy for ovarian cancer; or abdominal/pelvic radiotherapy.Primary EndpointOverall survival.Sample Size772 patients.Estimated Dates for Completing Accrual and Presenting ResultsAccrual completion approximately mid-2019, results are expected after 5 years' follow-up in 2024.Trial RegistrationNCT02828618.

The Role of Liver Resection at the Time of Secondary Cytoreduction in Patients With Recurrent Ovarian Cancer

2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 70-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valentin Kolev ◽  
Elena B. Pereira ◽  
Myron Schwartz ◽  
Umut Sarpel ◽  
Sasan Roayaie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Survival Analysis ◽  
Liver Resection ◽  
Ovarian Carcinoma ◽  
Cytoreductive Surgery ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Recurrent Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Kaplan Meier

ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to determine the role of liver metastatectomy in the morbidity and survival of patients with recurrent ovarian carcinoma.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the records of all patients who had undergone hepatic resection for liver metastases from ovarian carcinoma at the time of cytoreductive surgery at our institution from 1988 to 2012. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis. A total of 76 patients met the inclusion criteria and had undergone liver resection as part of cytoreductive surgery for ovarian carcinoma during the study period. Of these 76 patients, 27 underwent liver resection at the time of secondary cytoreduction, and these patients that are the focus of this analysis.ResultsMedian overall survival for the study group from the time of diagnosis to the last follow-up or death was 56 months (range, 12–249 months). Twenty died of the disease with an overall median survival of 12 months from the time of the liver resection (2–190 months), and 7 patients were alive with the disease at the time of the last follow-up. Based on Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, the factors associated with the longest survival after the liver resection (2–190 months) were the interval from the primary surgery of less than 24 months versus more than 24 months (P= 0.044) and secondary cytoreduction to residual disease of less than 1 cm (P= 0.014).ConclusionsBased on our analysis of a single institution’s series of ovarian cancer patients with hepatic metastasis, liver resection is feasible and safe and should be considered as an option in selected patients at the time of secondary cytoreduction.

scholarly journals CRITERIA FOR SELECTION OF PATIENTS WITH HIGH CHANCE OF COMPLETE OR OPTIMAL DEBULKING IN ADVANCED OVARIAN CANCER

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 53-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. A. Rumyantsev ◽  
A. S. Tjulandina ◽  
I. A. Pokataev ◽  
D. Z. Kupchan ◽  
S. A. Tjulandin
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Optimal Debulking ◽  
High Chance ◽  
Selection Of Patients ◽  
Criteria For Selection ◽  
Selection Of

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: An institutional experience.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e17044-e17044
Author(s):  
Kavitha Jain ◽  
Arun Chaturvedi ◽  
Sanjeev Misra ◽  
Vijay Kumar ◽  
Sameer Gupta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Ovarian Carcinoma ◽  
Epithelial Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Response To Therapy ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Gynecological Malignancy

e17044 Background: Epithelial ovarian cancer is the second most common gynecological malignancy among Indian women. Primary debulking surgery remains the standard of care in advanced operable ovarian cancer patients, but is associated with morbidity. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by delayed primary cytoreductive surgery maybe a better treatment strategy in advanced ovarian cancer. We present our experience of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer with special emphasis on treatment outcomes. Methods: A retrospective analysis of advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma (Stage IIIc and IV) patients treated at the Department of Surgical Oncology at King George’s Medical University, Lucknow between 2012 and 2017 was done. Results: A total of 151 patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma were treated during this period. Median age at diagnosis was 46 years. Among these patients, 137 underwent surgery, of which 59.1% were optimally cytoreduced. Papillary serous adenocarcinoma was the most common histological subtype (76.1%). Recurrence was seen in 79.3% patients, with a median time to recurrence 17 months (range 6.5 - 39 months). They were managed with second line chemotherapy and surgery. Median overall survival in this study for optimally cytoreduced stage III patients was 39 months and 18 months for optimally cytoreduced stage IV patients. Median progression free survival for stage III was 12 months and stage IV was 6 months. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy facilitates surgery in advanced ovarian cancer and helps in assessing chemotherapy responsiveness. It provides an opportunity to modify systemic treatment if there no response to therapy or disease progression.

scholarly journals Role of diagnostic laparoscopy in patients with large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the ovary with cancerous peritonitis: case report and review of the literature

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hideaki Tsuyoshi ◽  
Kenji Yashiro ◽  
Shizuka Yamada ◽  
Makoto Yamamoto ◽  
Toshimichi Onuma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Neuroendocrine Carcinoma ◽  
Cytoreductive Surgery ◽  
Diagnostic Laparoscopy ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Large Cell ◽  
Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma

Abstract Background Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma is a very rare ovarian neoplasm that has a poor clinical outcome even in the early stage, and there is as yet no established treatment. Diagnostic laparoscopy has been used to determine the possibility of primary optimal cytoreductive surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. However, the role of diagnostic laparoscopy is still unclear in large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma due to its rarity. Case presentation A 31-year-old woman with abdominal distention was referred to our hospital. She was strongly suspected of having advanced ovarian cancer because of a huge pelvic mass, massive ascites, and their appearance on medical imaging. However, cytological examinations from ascitic fluid by abdominal paracentesis did not show any malignant cells. She underwent diagnostic laparoscopy to evaluate the possibility of primary optimal cytoreductive surgery, and only tissue sampling was performed for pathological diagnosis because of the countless disseminated lesions of various sizes in the intraperitoneal organs. The patient had no postoperative complications, leading to the early start of postoperative chemotherapy. Conclusions To date, there have been no systematic reviews that focused on determining the treatment strategy using laparoscopy. Diagnostic laparoscopy can be helpful to determine the optimal treatment, including primary debulking surgery, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, or best supportive care, assisting in decision-making particularly for patients with advanced large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma with carcinomatous peritonitis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document