scholarly journals Evaluasi Supplier Bahan Baku Plat Besi Dengan Menggunakan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process Dan Taguchi Loss Function

2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 10
Author(s):  
Wildatul Khoiro

PT. Lamongan Marine Industry is a manufacturing company that produce large ships. The company have contracts with four suppliers of iron plate. In cooperation with these suppliers, they unable to meet the quality standards for iron plate is a measure of the thickness of the thick 45 mm. Material defects from suppliers thickness is less the limit set by the company is 0,3 mm – 0,5 mm. Process evaluation of the suppliers performed to look for suppliers that meet the criteria of the company. In this study, supplier evaluation process is carried out using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Taguchi Loss Function (TLF). AHP for wighting each of criterian, while TLF  for calculating loss function each of supplier. Criterian of the supplier evaluation are price, quality, delivery, underweight, availability, payment system, guarantee policy and repair service, with wight for each criterion are 6%, 6%, 8%, 15%, 17%, 13%, 8% and 26%. The results showed that the best supplier that meets the company criteria is a supplier  PT. Biz Fitting with loss Rp. 1.140.973.

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 178
Author(s):  
Muhammad Yanu Asdidi ◽  
Moeso Alpianto ◽  
Ahmad Ainul Yaqin

Supplier evaluation process is a strategic activity on purchasing management that aims to find out the performance of the supplier. PT. Fronte Classic Indonesia is a company manufacturing car carpet, one of the raw materials needed in producing car carpet that is calcium. The supplier in partnership with the company has performance that is less suitable. The methods used in this research Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Taguchi Loss Function. AHP is used to determine the weights of the criteria and Taguchi Loss Function is used to calculate the loss function of the respective supplier. Supplier evaluation process carried out to search for suppliers and meet the criteria of the company. The criteria used in the evaluation of suppliers are price, delivery, quality, the accuracy of goods quantity, guarantee policy, response to claims. The results showed that the suppliers who meet the criteria of the company by providing minimum losses as the best supplier.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 97-107
Author(s):  
Yanti Helianty ◽  
Dyah Anggraeni

ABSTRAK                                                                              Untuk mendapatkan bahan baku pada proses produksinya, pada umumnya industri bekerja sama dengan pemasok (supplier) bahan baku. Pemilihan supplier yang tepat dapat membantu kelancaran proses produksi dan membuat perusahaan mampu menghasilkan produk dengan kualitas baik yang sesuai dengan keinginan konsumen sehingga dapat meminimasi kerugian yang disebabkan oleh penyimpangan yang dilakukan oleh supplier. Pada penelitian ini dilakukan proses pemilihan supplier berdasarkan hasil evaluasi masing-masing supplier menggunakan metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) dan Taguchi Loss Function. AHP digunakan untuk mengetahui bobot masing-masing kriteria, sedangkan Taguchi Loss Function digunakan untuk menghitung kerugian yang disebabkan oleh penyimpangan-penyimpangan yang dilakukan oleh masing-masing supplier berdasarkan bobot kriteria yang telah dihitung menggunakan metode AHP. Kriteria yang digunakan pada penelitian ini yaitu harga, kualitas, pengiriman, ketepatan jumlah barang, dan sistem pembayaran. Urutan bobot masing-masing kriteria yaitu 0,3838 untuk kriteria kualitas, 0,3009 untuk kriteria harga, 0,1408 untuk kriteria pengiriman, 0,0874 untuk kriteria ketepatan jumlah barang, dan 0,0871 untuk kriteria sistem pembayaran. Berdasarkan perhitungan Taguchi Loss Function diperoleh usulan prioritas pemilihan supplier bahan baku berdasarkan nilai kerugian terkecil.  


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 113
Author(s):  
Nadya Uci Pramita ◽  
Adhitomo Wirawan

The purpose of this study is to analyze the process of performance evaluation of vendors especially in the vendor that provides a raw material for pressure vessel plate made of carbon steel. As for the evaluation process undertaken by PT. XYZ through performance indicators (KPI) where an evaluation that applied a focus on quality and delivery. In this study, researchers used the designation criteria vendor performance indicator (VPI) where the criteria used consist of quality, cost, delivery, flexibility and responsiveness (QCDFR). The methods used in the analysis process that is Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Data collecting directionally by questionnaire method among 3 respondents on the procurement department that know the performance of the vendors over the years. The result showed that PT. RE has the best performance among the four vendors, as known PT.SS, PT. ST, PT. CH and PT. UN within value 0.540; The vendor with lowest performance owned by PT.CH within value 0.034.Keyword : Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), vendor performance indicator (vpi), plate pressure vessel, vendor performance evaluation Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis proses evaluasi kinerja vendor khususnya pada vendor yang mensupplai bahan baku plate pressure vessel berbahan carbon steel. Adapun proses evaluasi yang dilakukan oleh PT. XYZ melalui key performance indicator (KPI) dimana evaluasi yang diterapkan hanya berfokus pada quality dan delivery. Dalam studi ini, peneliti menggunakan penetapan kriteria Vendor Performance Indicator (VPI) dimana kriteria yang digunakan yaitu quality, cost, delivery, flexibility dan responsiveness (QCDFR). Metode yang digunakan dalam proses analisis yaitu Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Pengambilan data menggunakan kuisioner terhadap 3 informan pada departemen procurement yang dianggap mengetahui kinerja vendor selama ini. Adapun hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa PT. RE memiliki kinerja yang terbaik diantara keempat vendor yaitu PT. SS, PT. ST, PT. CH serta PT. UN dengan nilai bobot sebesar 0.540 sedangkan vendor dengan kinerja terendah dimiliki oleh PT. CH dengan nilai bobot sebesar 0.034.Kata kunci : Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), vendor performance indicator (VPI), plate pressure vessel, evaluasi kinerja vendor.


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Efe Akyurek ◽  
Pelin Bolat

Abstract Introduction The merchant marine fleet is under inspection by several parties to ensure maritime regulation compliance. International Maritime Organization mainly regulates the industry, and the most effective defender is indeed Port StateControl run by the regional memorandum of understandings. Objective This article aims to analyze all detention remarks of Paris Memoranda of Understanding (MOU) from 2013 to 2019 for EU15 countries (except Luxemburg and Austria) to guide marine industry on detainable Port State Control remarks and country risk profile. Methods The data of the detained vessels taken from the public website of Paris MOU and each report considered as a professional judgment that causes detention. Analytical Hierarchy Process Approach has been utilized to indicate the ranking of basic maritime regulations from the perspective of the Port State Control, and Geographic Information System (GIS) helps us to demonstrate the regional dispersion amongst EU15. Results Through an approach based on Analytical Hierarchy Process and demonstrating the results on GIS has been shown that almost all the country’s top priorities for regulation are Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS) and Fire Safety Systems (FSS). Moreover, a comparative demonstration of the detention percentage of each regulation to AHP results demonstrates a better understanding of EU15 countries' detention profile. Conclusion The results of the study can assist Port State Officers, ship crew, ship owners, and managers in presenting the facts of their inspection and able to improve themselves. The spatial analysis is also expected to guide ship owners and managers to focus their vessel’s deficiencies on preventing sub-standardization. Policymakers also utilize these reports to evaluate their inspection practices.


2009 ◽  
Vol 9 (24) ◽  
pp. 4240-4246 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.N. Sadigh ◽  
Norzima bt. Zulkif ◽  
T.S. Hong ◽  
M. Abdolshah

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document