Exploring the phenomenon of students’ daily events continuing into classes: Based on van Manen’s pedagogy

Author(s):  
Bosun Min ◽  
Kwangsoon Jeong
Keyword(s):  
2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Newman ◽  
John Nezlek ◽  
Todd Thrash ◽  
John Dombrowski

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 309-309
Author(s):  
Julie Kircher ◽  
Susan Charles ◽  
Nancy Sin ◽  
David Almeida

Abstract Chronic pain is a common condition in later life that is related to high levels of anxiety and depression. One reason why chronic pain is related to affective distress is that this condition may prevent people from deriving the same positive emotions from enjoyable activities. Few studies, however, have examined how exposure and reactivity to daily events differ by chronic pain status. We hypothesized that those with chronic pain will have less exposure and less positive affect reactivity to positive daily events compared to those without chronic pain. Participants from the diary substudy of MIDUS (N = 1,733; nChronicPain = 658, nNoPain = 1,075; M = 56 years-old) completed eight interview days. Chronic pain status was unrelated to the frequency of positive events. Multi-level models revealed that although people with chronic pain had lower levels of daily positive affect, they reacted more positively to daily events (γ = -.033, SE = .010, p < .0001). As a result, levels of daily positive affect on days when people experienced a positive event did not vary by pain status (MChronicPain = 2.73, MNoPain = 2.75). People with chronic pain averaged higher levels of daily negative affect compared to people without chronic pain (MChronicPain = .21, M NoPain =.20), but, on days when they experience a positive event, those with chronic pain had a greater decrease in their negative affect. Findings suggest that positive events impact those with chronic pain more than they do individuals without chronic pain.


2012 ◽  
Vol 117 (D21) ◽  
pp. n/a-n/a ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosie Eade ◽  
Emily Hamilton ◽  
Doug M. Smith ◽  
Richard J. Graham ◽  
Adam A. Scaife
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 57 (2) ◽  
pp. 380-398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lee N. Johnson ◽  
Kayla D. Mennenga ◽  
Megan Oka ◽  
Rachel B. Tambling ◽  
Shayne R. Anderson ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Junça Silva ◽  
António Caetano ◽  
Rita Rueff Lopes

This study aims to: (1) analyze the relationship between humor-daily events and well-being; (2) test the mediating role of positive affect in this relationship; (3) analyze the moderating role of gelotophobia between humor-daily events and positive affect, and; (4) explore the moderating role of psychological climate between positive affect and well-being. To test these goals, we conducted a quasi-experimental study with 93 participants. We used regressions and bootstrapping analyses to test the moderated mediation model. The relationship between the humor-daily events and well-being was mediated by positive affect and this relation was moderated by psychological work, such that this relationship was stronger when a positive psychological work climate was identified. Gelotophobia did not moderate the relationship between humor daily-events and positive affect, however, it significantly and negatively predicted positive affect. This paper adds considerable evidence of the relationship between humor-related daily events and its impact on well-being. Psychological work climate strengthens the association between positive affect and well-being, after humor daily events.


Author(s):  
Shigehiro Oishi ◽  
Ed Diener ◽  
Dong-Won Choi ◽  
Chu Kim-Prieto ◽  
Incheol Choi
Keyword(s):  

2012 ◽  
Vol 117 (D3) ◽  
pp. n/a-n/a ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily Hamilton ◽  
Rosie Eade ◽  
Richard J. Graham ◽  
Adam A. Scaife ◽  
Doug M. Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

1999 ◽  
Vol 67 (5) ◽  
pp. 755-764 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine A. Marco ◽  
John M. Neale ◽  
Joseph E. Schwartz ◽  
Saul Shiffman ◽  
Arthur A. Stone
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document