scholarly journals Phenotypic variation and estimation of genetic parameters for plant growth, fruit quality traits and bacterial blight disease resistance in gamma () irradiated seed derived progenies and germplasms of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.)

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 2518-2524
Author(s):  
Dadepeer A Peerajade ◽  
Dr. Narayan Moger ◽  
Dr. Patil HB ◽  
Dr. Ramesh Bhat ◽  
Dr. Jamadar MM ◽  
...  
2008 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
F.F. Silva ◽  
M.G. Pereira ◽  
H.C.C. Ramos ◽  
P.C. Damasceno Junior ◽  
T.N.S. Pereira ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 577-581
Author(s):  
D. P. Sharma ◽  
Julius Chakma ◽  
N. Sharma ◽  
Niranjan Singh

Orchard management practices are the most important cultural tools for successful and sustainable cultivation of any fruit crop including pomegranate. Orchard management systems have an effect on growth, yield and fruit quality through their smoothening effects on the availability of nutrients, conservation of moisture and reduction of weed competition. Orchard management practices treatments viz., five orchard floor management treatments viz., T1: Grass mulch (10 cm thick), T2: Black polythene mulch, T3: Clean basin + Herbicidal treatment (Glyphosate 7ml/ litre), T4: Ridge basin + Grass mulch and T5: Control (No mulching). The results of the experiment, black several that polythene mulch proved to be most effective in increasing plant growth (51.80 cm), yield (13.05 kg/plant) of superior fruits and also in conservation of soil moisture. Grass mulch was better when compared to other orchard floor man-agement practices in terms of growth (47.00 cm) and yield (12.35 kg). The orders of the orchard floor management practices in moisture conservation are: black polythene mulch 13.51 %> grass mulch 12.38 % > ridge basin + grass mulch 9.31% > clean basin + Herbicidal treatment (Glyphosate 7 ml/litre) 9.20 %> control 7.64 %. Orchard floor management treatments did not exert any significant effect in controlling bacterial blight disease on leaf and fruit surface.


2009 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 659-672 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abou Bakari Kouassi ◽  
Charles-Eric Durel ◽  
Fabrizio Costa ◽  
Stefano Tartarini ◽  
Eric van de Weg ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 143-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liyuan Zhang ◽  
Yiqun Hu ◽  
Ping Li ◽  
Xiaobing Wang ◽  
Hansong Dong

2017 ◽  
Vol 165 (11-12) ◽  
pp. 727-736 ◽  
Author(s):  
Konduvally Annegowda Lalithya ◽  
Girigowda Manjunatha ◽  
Besagarahally Raju ◽  
Mukund S. Kulkarni ◽  
Veeresh Lokesh

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 358-362
Author(s):  
D. P. Sharma ◽  
Niranjan Singh

Pruning of fruit trees is an important aspect for the improvement of fruit quality and to minimize the pests and disease attack. Pruning was performed in the month of December in seven year old unpruned trees of Punica granatum cv. Knadhdri Kabuli having many interfering branching and a heavy infestation of bacterial blight orchard. The pruning treatments viz., T1: Retention of 15cm fruiting shoot length, T2: Retention of 30cm fruiting shoot length, T3: Retention of 45cm fruiting shoot length, T4: Retention of 60cm fruiting shoot length and T5: control (No heading back and no thinning) plant. The results of the present investigation revealed that among different pruning treatment, the best results in terms of shoot extension (56.34 cm), fruit size (Diameter 9.66 cm and Length 9.65 cm, fruit weight (278.50 g), marketable yield (10.25 kg) and fruit qualities were in fruits from T1 and T2 where retention of 15cm fruiting shoot length respectively and retention of 30cm fruiting shoot length were maintained. However, maximum fruit set (54.73%) was recorded in control, and it decreased with increasing pruning intensity. The pruning treatments also proved beneficial in controlling bacterial blight on fruit (12.86%) and leaf surface (26.60%) to some extent.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document