scholarly journals J. Baudouin de Courtenay, A. Schleicher and “Beiträge zur vergleichenden Sprachforschung auf dem Gebiete der arischen, celtischen und slawischen Sprachen”

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 888-904
Author(s):  
Oleg V. Lukin
Keyword(s):  
Historical Linguistics ◽  
Academic Development ◽  
Scientific Publication ◽  
Cooperative Work ◽  
Linguistic Community ◽  
Scientific Paradigm ◽  
Full List ◽  
World Class ◽  
General Linguistic ◽  
Xix Century

The article is devoted to two outstanding linguists - Jan Niecisław Ignacy Baudouin de Courtenay (13.03.1845-3.11.1929) and A. Schleicher (19.02.1821-6.12.1868) - and their cooperative work in Beitrge zur vergleichenden Sprachforschung auf dem Gebiete der arischen, celtischen und slawischen Sprachen, the journal established by A. Schleicher and A. Kuhn. The article contains some understudied facts about the relations between the two great scientists and a description of the scientific paradigm in which their interaction developed. This article provides a full list of Baudouins works published in the Beitrge zur vergleichenden Sprachforschung auf dem Gebiete der arischen, celtischen und slawischen Sprachen journal and the articles by Schleicher published in its first volume. It also gives the names of scientists who supported the journal and influenced academic development of both linguists. Beitrge zur vergleichenden Sprachforschung auf dem Gebiete der arishen, celtischen und slawischen Sprachen, one of the most authoritative bodies of Indo-European studies of the XIX century, has become a recognized tribune of world-class researchers in the field of comparative historical linguistics since its foundation in 1858. In addition to A. Kuhn, A. Schleicher and his students (A. Leskin and J. Schmidt), such outstanding linguists as T. Aufrecht, A.F. Weber, F. Miklosich, M. Mller, A.F. Pott, H. Steinthal, W.D. Whitney, H.W. Ebel and many others published their scientific works there. J. Baudouin de Courtenays collaboration with this scientific publication was fruitful for his development as a scientist and allowed him to introduce his revolutionary views to the general linguistic community.

Root lexical features and inflectional marking of tense in Proto-Indo-European

2009 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 505-532 ◽  
Author(s):  
ANNAMARIA BARTOLOTTA
Keyword(s):  
Historical Linguistics ◽  
Past Tense ◽  
Inflectional Morphology ◽  
Verbal System ◽  
Lexical Aspect ◽  
Lexical Feature ◽  
General Linguistic ◽  
Linguistic Approaches ◽  
Shed Light

This paper examines early inflectional morphology related to the tense-aspect system of Proto-Indo-European. It will be argued that historical linguistics can shed light on the long-standing debate over the emergence of tense-aspect morphology in language acquisition. The dispute over this issue is well-known; it has been pursued mostly by scholars following various general linguistic approaches, from typology to acquisition, but also by historical linguists and Indo-Europeanists, who have long debated about the precedence of aspect or tense from both a synchronic and a diachronic perspective. However, so far Indo-Europeanists have rarely confronted their results in a successful way with recent research in other fields such as acquisition or neurolinguistics. The aim of this paper is to put forward evidence from the reconstruction of the Proto-Indo-European verbal system concerning the prominent role of root lexical aspect features in the emergence of grammatical marking of tense in the proto-language. More precisely, by means of a comparison between the residual archaic verbal forms of theinjunctivein Vedic Sanskrit and the corresponding augmentless preterites in Homeric Greek, it will be argued that the [±telic] lexical feature of the inherited verbal root is responsible for a non-random distribution of past tense inflected forms in an earlier verbal paradigm.

scholarly journals Authorial compatibility of words in I.A. Goncharov’s novels: comparative stylometry

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 95-100
Author(s):  
M. Yu. Mukhin ◽  
M. Yu. Mukhin
Keyword(s):  
Statistical Analysis ◽  
Russian Language ◽  
Initial Material ◽  
Context Analysis ◽  
Full List ◽  
Comparative Statistical Analysis ◽  
Individual Use ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Xix Century ◽  
Classical Prose

The following article deals with peculiarities of unique lexical compatibility in classical prose of the XIX century and contains preliminary results of the cross-disciplinary corpus research performed by group of scientists of the Ural Federal University. This project suggests creation of individual syntagmatic profiles for the famous Russian writers. With works of I.A. Goncharov as an example and compared to the texts of other authors special context surrounding for words zhizn (life) and zhit (live) is systematized. Initial material is extracted through comparative statistical analysis of bigrams lexical pairs, when used in the same phrase context. Lexems zhizn (life) and zhit (live) are one of the most frequent words in Russian language, however, each author tends to use them in his own, special context surrounding. Novels by I.A. Goncharov (A Common Story, Oblomov, The Precipice, Frigate Pallada) provide relatively more issues of authors individual lexical compatibility for these words, than texts created by others; in addition a full list of syntagmatically active words for Goncharovs texts is represented in this article. Context analysis is conducted to show, how semantic connections between words in contexts reflect conceptual characteristics of Goncharovs idiostyle. Comments on the individual use of words zhizn (life) and zhit (live) by other writers A.P. Chekhov, L.N. Tolstoy, I.S. Turgenev and F.M. Dostoevsky are given. Conclusions are drawn about perspectives of performing comparative statistical analysis of lexical syntagmatics in modern philology

HISTORICAL LINGUISTICS: AN INTRODUCTION.Lyle Campbell. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1998. Pp. xx + 396. $30.00 paper.

2000 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 289-290
Author(s):  
Donald F. Reindl
Keyword(s):  
Language Acquisition ◽  
Historical Linguistics ◽  
Universal Grammar ◽  
Linguistic Theory ◽  
Human Cognition ◽  
Language Typology ◽  
General Linguistic

In his introduction, Campbell makes a case for the broader relevance of historical linguistics by noting that observing what does and does not change in language contributes to “the understanding of universal grammar, language typology, and human cognition in general” (p. 2). The generativist perspective that phonological and syntactic changes are linked to language acquisition, cited on page 236, illustrates one interface between historical linguistics and general linguistic theory.

scholarly journals Theoretical Assumptions in Terms of Anthropocentrism in the Context Modern Linguistic Science

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 384-388
Author(s):  
N. Normurodova
Keyword(s):  
Dominant Role ◽  
Linguistic Community ◽  
Scientific Paradigm ◽  
The Past ◽  
Theoretical Assumptions

Over the past decades, radical transformations have been observed in linguistics. The modern stage in the development of linguistics is characterized by polyparadigms, but the dominant role is assigned to the anthropocentric paradigm. Today, in the linguistic community, the main trends and principles of modern linguistics, in particular, the problem of the scientific paradigm is one of the most urgent and at the same time debatable problems. Mainly, this article focuses on the idea of changing the paradigms of knowledge in the development of linguistics and, in accordance with this, suggests their various terminological variations.

scholarly journals From the history of the emergence and development of Adventism in the XIX century.

2006 ◽  
pp. 103-112
Author(s):  
Roman A. Sitarchuk
Keyword(s):  
North America ◽  
Organizational Structure ◽  
Early Period ◽  
History Of ◽  
World Class ◽  
Xix Century

This article is about an early period in the history of Adventism as a future world-class denomination. The activity of the most famous theologian scientists whose works influenced the formation of the foundations of Adventist doctrine is depicted. The formation of the organizational structure of Adventists in North America, as well as in other continents, is being scrutinized.

scholarly journals The Structure of Akroá and Xakriabá and their relation to Xavante and Xerente: A contribution to the historical linguistics of the Jê languages

2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 17
Author(s):  
Fernando Orphão de Carvalho ◽  
Gean Nunes Damulakis
Keyword(s):  
Historical Linguistics ◽  
The Other ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
Linguistic Family ◽  
Historical Investigation ◽  
The One ◽  
Xix Century

The goal of this paper is twofold: on the one hand, we aim at clarifying aspects of the phonology and morphology of Akroá and Xakriabá, to the extent that these are discernible on the basis of both the interpretation of XIX century vocabulary lists collected by explorers and the comparison with their closest extant relatives, the Xavante and Xerente languages. On the other hand, we show that by means of this comparison our knowledge of the relations among these four languages which are taken to form the central branch of the Jê linguistic family, is greatly advanced, contributing in this way to the historical investigation of the Jê languages at large.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document