scholarly journals Penulisan Penghakiman Menurut Perspektif Fiqh Al-Qaḍā’dan Aplikasi Mahkamah Syariah Di Malaysia

Jurnal Fiqh ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 377-408
Author(s):  
Zulzaidi Mahmod ◽  
Ahmad Hidayat Buang

Islamic management strongly emphasizes the method of writing such as the writing of wills, debts, agreements and judgments. Judgment writing is an important aspect of the justice process. The writing of judgments is emphasized by the majority of fuqaha’ to ensure transparency in judicial proceedings. The purpose of writing this article to view at the approach outlined by Fiqh al-Qaḍā regarding the writing of judgments and applications of Syariah Courts in Malaysia based on the provisions of laws and the application of Practice Direction in Syariah Courts. The writing of this manuscript has revealed that Islamic scholars have outlined the concepts of al-Sijjilāt, al-Maḥaḍar and Kitāb al-Qaḍī ilā al-Qaḍī as a process of judicial writing. Notes of proceedings and records of cases in respect of judgments are kept for the purpose of appeal and execution of judgments. This matter is also applied in the Syariah Courts in Malaysia through the approach outlined by the laws and the practice directions of the Syariah Courts. The implementation of judgment writing by Syariah Judges in Malaysia has been transformed through the e-Bicara application of the e-Syariah system and it is in line with the Fiqh al-Qaḍā ’approach.

1997 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 293-300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ype H. Poortinga ◽  
Ingrid Lunt

In national codes of ethics the practice of psychology is presented as rooted in scientific knowledge, professional skills, and experience. However, it is not self-evident that the body of scientific knowledge in psychology provides an adequate basis for current professional practice. Professional training and experience are seen as necessary for the application of psychological knowledge, but they appear insufficient to defend the soundness of one's practices when challenged in judicial proceedings of a kind that may be faced by psychologists in the European Union in the not too distant future. In seeking to define the basis for the professional competence of psychologists, this article recommends taking a position of modesty concerning the scope and effectiveness of psychological interventions. In many circumstances, psychologists can only provide partial advice, narrowing down the range of possible courses of action more by eliminating unpromising ones than by pointing out the most correct or most favorable one. By emphasizing rigorous evaluation, the profession should gain in accountability and, in the long term, in respectability.


2002 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Duff

On 1 April 1996, a rather odd provision was introduced into the Scottish criminal justice process, namely a duty on both prosecution and defence to try to agree uncontroversial evidence in advance of criminal trial.1 As far as the writer is aware, such a provision is unique, although the philosophy underlying its introduction is not totally alien to inquisitorial systems of criminal justice.2 What is particularly peculiar about this duty is that there is no sanction for a failure, however unreasonable, to agree uncontroversial evidence.3 The lack of a sanction resulted from a concern that the creation of any penalty would impinge unjustifiably upon the rights of the accused. The intention in this article is to explore in detail the relationship between the duty to agree uncontroversial evidence and the position of the accused, and to suggest that the imposition of a sanction for a breach of this duty is not as problematic as was thought by those responsible for the legislation.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 149-154
Author(s):  
YURI FRANCIFOROV ◽  
◽  
MARINA BARANOVA

The purpose of the article is to consider the peculiarities of investigative and judicial actions that are caused by their postponement, the inability to attract a lawyer, as well as the suspension of the preliminary investigation during the period of emergency measures taken by the government of the Russian Federation in response to the outbreak of the coronavirus infection pandemic (COVID-19). The authorsanalyze the features of the courts activity in connection with the coronavirus pandemic, which is associated with minimizing the personal reception of citizens and submitting documents via electronic Internet reception offices of courts or by Russian Post, as well as the possibility of conducting online court sessions. The authors come to the conclusion that the judicial system was not sufficiently prepared for the pandemic, and therefore it is urgently necessary to adopt a special normative act that would regulate the implementation of judicial proceedings in emergency situations, allowing to continue to consider urgent cases, including materials on the election, extension, cancellation or change of a preventive measure.


2014 ◽  
pp. 13-31
Author(s):  
Katarzyna Grzelak-Bach

Following a brief introduction of article 6 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, the author begins by analyzing case law from the European Court of Human Rights regarding the legal reasoning in judicial proceedings. The main premise of this paper is to present a formula for preparing legal reasoning in administrative court proceedings. The author draws attention to the role of judges who, in the process of adjudication, should apply creative interpretation of the rules of law, when they see errors or omissions in legislative provisions, or blatant violations of the European legal order. The conclusion of those deliberations finds, that the process of tailoring the approach to meet Strasbourg’s requirements should, on a basic level, be at the discretion of judges rather than the legislators.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Holtzman ◽  
Barbara S. Jones ◽  
Victor Stone ◽  
Thomas W. Taylor ◽  
Patricia A. Tracey

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Holtzman ◽  
Barbara S. Jones ◽  
Victor Stone ◽  
Thomas W. Taylor ◽  
Patricia A. Tracey

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document