scholarly journals O diálogo entre esportes e o juiz supranacional: o reenvio prejudicial

2021 ◽  
pp. 110-132
Author(s):  
Cláudio Finkelstein ◽  
Rita de Cassia Carvalho Lopes
Keyword(s):  

O presente artigo objetiva analisar o diálogo entre o sistema nacional e o sistema supranacional da ordem comunitária europeia, sob a perspectiva do reenvio a título prejudicial, cujo desenvolvimento impacta no subsistema do direito desportivo. O trabalho, também, trata dos reflexos dos diálogos entre ordens jurídicas com potencial para restringir a autonomia da lex sportiva. Para tanto, cita-se decisão do Tribunal de Justiça da União Europeia que discute o conceito de esporte, num contexto sobre isenção tributária. O artigo ocupa-se das facetas desse diálogo, partindo da importância da jurisprudência do Tribunal de Justiça da União Europeia e concluindo que são possíveis outras interações entre sistemas jurídicos, especialmente quanto a direitos fundamentais e direitos humanos. O artigo utiliza o método dedutivo, que parte dos conceitos para aplicação na hipótese.

Veritas ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-62
Author(s):  
Slamet Riyanto
Keyword(s):  

Doktrin Lex Sportiva dirumuskan sebagai ajaran mengenai hukum yang khusus mengatur tentang olahraga yang dibentuk oleh institusi komunitas olahraga itu sendiri dan berlaku serta ditegakkan oleh lembaga olahraga itu sendiri tanpa intervensi dari hukum positif suatu negara dan tanpa intervensi dari hukum internasional. Lex sportiva ini tegas-tegas menolak digunakannya hukum nasional suatu negara, baik dalam penyelenggaraan, pengawasan, pengendalian, maupun  penyelesaian sengketa olahraga cabang olahraga. Selain itu cabang-cabang olahraga juga menolak campur tangan atau intervensi  pemerintah atau negara dalam kekisruhan yang terjadi dalam organisasi cabang olaharaga. Bahkan federasi internasional cabang olahraga ini tidak segan-segan menjatuhkan sanksi kepada federasi nasional cabang olahraga dari suatu negara peserta yang pemerintah atau negaranya melakukan campur tangan atau intervensi terhadap penyelenggaraan cabang olahraga ini. Dalam konteks Indonesia, kehadiran peraturan perundang-undangan keolahragaan seringkali dimaknai oleh federasi internasional cabang olahraga dan atau penganut lex sportiva di Indonesia sebagai bentuk campur tangan atau intervensi negara terhadap penyelenggaraan sepakbola yang menjadi kewenangannya, sehingga harus ditolak. Mereka berpandangan bahwa Hukum Olahraga Nasional Indonesia yang dimanifestasikan dalam Undang-Undang Sistem Keolahragaan Nasional (UU SKN) dan 3 (tiga) Peraturan Pemerintah,  hanya boleh mengatur hal-hal yang berkaitan dengan olahraga dari sisi public interest-nya saja. Itupun dengan catatan bahwa norma-norma hukum dari peraturan perundang-undangan yang dibuat oleh Pemerintah Indonesia tersebut tidak mengintervensi terhadap Lex Sportiva. Jika UU SKN dan peraturan perundang-undangan lainnya mengatur terlalu jauh dan masuk ke ranah lex sportiva, maka dapat dipastikan olahraga di Indonesia tidak diakui sebagai bagian dari olahraga internasional. Disini dapat dikatakan telah terjadi benturan antara sistem hukum keolahragaan nasional sebagai salah satu alat pengembangan kedaulatan negara yang menganut paham positifisme dengan lex sportiva sebagai alat pengembangan kesejahteraan masyarakat yang menganut paham utilitiarisme.


2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (14) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mateus de Oliveira Fornasier (Unijuí/RS) ◽  
Thiago dos Santos da Silva (Unijuí/RS)

O objetivo geral deste trabalho é observar como os processos multicêntricos do sistema jurídico permitem o diálogo entre ordens jurídicas de diferentes níveis, possibilitando falar-se em um Direito Global. Como hipótese principal, sugere-se que tem ocorrido, a partir do século XX (pelo menos), a emergência de um Direito Global, o qual pressupõe não apenas as comunicações atinentes ao Estado (leis, tratados/convenções, regulamentos, jurisprudência de Cortes estatais), mas também, de outras ordens não estatais – tais como a lex sportiva. Esse Direito Global, quando assim observado, é compreendido como reflexivo não apenas em relação às suas próprias comunicações, ocorrendo também verdadeiros diálogos entre ordens das mais variadas origens (estatais ou não). Objetivos específicos: i) descrever a Lex Sportiva, ordem jurídica transnacional, decorrente da relação reflexiva entre o Direito e a regulação esportiva; ii) analisar o transconstitucionalismo como metodologia dialogal-reflexiva para a observação da lex sportiva; iii) analisar o caso do atleta Jean-Marc Bosman, que desencadeou evolução nas relações profissionais entre atletas e clubes, a partir da segunda metade da década de 1990, exemplo de diálogo reflexivo entre a lex sportiva e ordens jurídicas estatais.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 168-183
Author(s):  
Artem Bredikhin

The development of sports law is directly related to the nature of sports, whose legal relations must have uniformity and stability, achieved through regulation by special rules created by international and national sports organizations – lex sportiva. This paper is devoted to lex sportiva as one of the most important tools for regulating cross-border relations in the field of sports. The author examines the origin and legal nature of lex sportiva as well as its impact on national legislation in the field of sports. Moreover, the author elaborates on possible meanings of this notion: lex sportiva as a set of rules of self-regulation, as a set of decisions of the Court of Arbitration for Sport, as a legal principle, as a phenomenon of implementation, and as a criterion for determining the amount of compensation. The author discusses the use of lex sportiva by the Court of Arbitration for Sport in the context of dispute resolution, since this court has formed an extensive judicial practice throughout its existence, which, together with the rules of national and international sports organizations, forms an important part of lex sportiva. In this regard, the author draws parallels with the related source of cross-border law – lex mercatoria, and also considers situations in which there are conflicts between lex sportiva and the norms of international law and rules of national legislation. In the field of sports, such legal conflicts are resolved by the principle of lex specialis derogat legi generali, according to which the rules of lex sportiva prevail over national law, providing a principle for the autonomy of sports. The first mention of the recognition of this principle is contained in the sources of law of the European Union. Finally, the author comes to the conclusion that the generally recognized two-dimensional understanding of lex sportiva as a doctrine and as a set of norms of self-regulation in sports is outdated, since it does not fully reveal the essence of the legal phenomenon, since it does not reflect all its properties which are manifested in the situations of legal regulation of relationships in the sports field. The exclusive role of lex sportiva is predicted to resolve international legal and organizational conflicts in the field of sports caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.


Author(s):  
Татьяна Александровна Скворцова ◽  
Максим Викторович Астафуров

Статья посвящена исследованию достаточно молодого феномена “lex sportivа”, выявлению подходов к определению сущности и структуры “lex sportivа”, определению сходных и отличительных черт между системами lex sportiva и lex mercatoria. Проанализированы решения Спортивного арбитражного суда в г. Лозанне и их влияние на формирование lex sportiva. Дано определение lex sportiva на основе проведенного исследования. The article is devoted to the research of the fairly young phenomenon of lex sportiva, to the detection of the approaches to defining the matter and structure “lex sportiva”, to the qualification of the similarities and distinctive features between the “lex sportiva” and “lex mercatoria” systems. Analyzed the decisions of the Court of Arbitration for Sport in Lausanne and their influence on the formation of the lex sportiva. The definition of lex sportiva is given on the basis of the conducted research.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document