scholarly journals Resynchronization in Heart Failure: What to choose?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad El Baba ◽  
Moses Wananu ◽  
Marwan Refaat ◽  
Jayakumar Sahadevan
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Biventricular Pacing ◽  
Nyha Class ◽  
Systolic Dysfunction ◽  
Severe Heart Failure ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction

Achieving Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with Biventricular pacing(BiVP) pacing for patients with moderate-to-severe heart failure (HF), left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction and ventricular dyssynchrony is well established and is currently the standard of care. Multiple studies have demonstrated significant improvement in quality of life, functional status, and exercise capacity in patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III and IV heart failure who underwent resynchronization therapy1,2. In addition, resynchronization therapy is associated with survival benefit3. However, one third of patients do not respond to BIVP. New modalities for resynchronization have emerged namely His bundle pacing (HBP) and left ventricular septal pacing (LVSP). In this paper, we will review the benefits and limitations of BiVP and also the role of new pacing modalities such as HBP and LVSP in patients with HF with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and electrical dysynchrony.

scholarly journals His-optimized cardiac resynchronization therapy in a patient with heart failure and right bundle branch block: a case report

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dmytro Volkov ◽  
Dmytro Lopin ◽  
Stanislav Rybchynskyi ◽  
Dmytro Skoryi
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Right Bundle Branch Block ◽  
Clinical Status ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Bundle Branch Block ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction

Abstract Background  Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an option for treatment for chronic heart failure (HF) associated with left bundle branch block (LBBB). Patients with HF and right bundle branch block (RBBB) have potentially worse outcomes in comparison to LBBB. Traditional CRT in RBBB can increase mortality and HF deterioration rates over native disease progression. His bundle pacing may improve the results of CRT in those patients. Furthermore, atrioventricular node ablation (AVNA) for rate control in atrial fibrillation (AF) can be challenging in patients with previously implanted leads in His region. Case summary  We report the case of 74-year-old gentleman with a 5-year history of HF, permanent AF with a rapid ventricular response, and RBBB. He was admitted to the hospital with complaints of severe weakness and shortness of breath. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was decreased (41%), right ventricle (RV) was dilated (41 mm), and QRS was prolonged (200 ms) with RBBB morphology. The patient underwent His-optimized CRT with further left-sided AVNA. As a result, LVEF increased to 51%, RV dimensions decreased to 35 mm with an improvement of the clinical status during a 6-month follow-up. Discussion  Patients with AF, RBBB, and HF represent the least evaluated clinical subgroup of individuals with less beneficial clinical outcomes according to CRT studies. Achieving the most effective resynchronization could require pacing fusion from sites beyond traditional with the intention to recruit intrinsic conduction pathways. This approach can be favourable for reducing RV dilatation, improving LVEF, and maximizing electrical resynchronization.

Abstract 5935: Influence of Recent Advances in the Management of Heart Failure and Ventricular Arrhythmias on Survival in Patients with Cardiac Sarcoidosis

Circulation ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 118 (suppl_18) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshikazu Yazaki ◽  
Mitsuaki Horigome ◽  
Kazunori Aizawa ◽  
Takeshi Tomita ◽  
Hiroki Kasai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ventricular Tachycardia ◽  
Cardiac Sarcoidosis ◽  
Severe Heart Failure ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Predictors Of Mortality ◽  
Recent Advances

Background : We previously described severity of heart failure and ventricular tachycardia (VT) as independent predictors of mortality in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis (CS). Medical treatment for chronic heart failure has been established over the last few decades. Prophylactic use of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT or CRT-D) have been introduced in patients with severe heart failure. We therefore hypothesized that the prognosis of CS improves due to such advances in the management of heart failure and VT. Methods : To confirm our hypothesis, we analyzed 43 CS patients diagnosed between 1988 and 2006 and treated with corticosteroids. We classified two sequential referral patients diagnosed between 1988 and 1997 (n=19) and between 1998 and 2006 (n=24), and compared treatment and prognosis between the two cohorts. Results : Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and dimensions were similar between the two cohorts. Although age in the 1988–1997 referral cohort was significantly younger than that in the 1998–2006 referral cohort (54±14years versus 62±10years, p<0.05), survival in the earlier cohort was significantly worse (log-rank=4.41, p<0.05). The 1- and 5-year mortality rates were 88% and 71% in the 1988–1997 referral cohort, and 96% and 92% in the 1998–2006 referral cohort, respectively. The 1998–2006 referral cohort showed significantly higher incidence of ICD or CRT-D implantation (29% versus 6%, p<0.05), β-blocker use (46% versus 6%, p<0.01) and addition of methotrexate (21% versus 0%, p<0.05), and increased maintenance dose (7.0±1.9mg/day versus 5.0±0.9mg/day, p<0.01) compared to the 1988–1997 referral cohort. Multivariate analysis including age, LVEF, and sustained ventricular tachycardia (sVT) identified diagnosis between 1988 and 1997 (hazard ratio [HR]: 19.8, p<0.01) and LVEF (HR: 0.83/1% increase, p<0.01) as independent predictors of mortality. Conclusions : Survival in the recent CS patients is significantly better than previously described. Recent advances in the device therapies and medical treatments including modified immunosuppression alter the clinical outcome in patients with CS.

scholarly journals Prediction of 5-year survival in patients with heart failure and implanted cardiac resynchronization therapy devices

2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 4409
Author(s):  
A. M. Soldatova ◽  
V. A. Kuznetsov ◽  
E. A. Gorbatenko ◽  
T. N. Enina ◽  
L. M. Malishevsky
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Nyha Class ◽  
Training Sample ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure

Aim. Based on clinical parameters and diagnostic investigations, to create a complex model of personalized selection of patients with heart failure (HF) for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). To establish the diagnostic value of the created model in predicting 5-year survival.Material and methods. The study included 141 patients with HF (men, 77,3%; women, 22,7%). The mean age of patients at the time of implantation was 60,0 [53,0; 66,0] years. All patients had New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II-IV HF, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35%, and QRS ≥130 ms. Patients were randomly divided into training (n=95) and test (n=36) samples, which were comparable in main clinical and functional characteristics.Results. The index included parameters that had a significant relationship with 5-year survival according to the Cox regression: male sex, prior myocardial infarction, hypertension, QRS <150 ms, no left bundle branch block, PR ≥200 ms with sinus rhythm/absence of radiofrequency ablation in atrial fibrillation, NYHA class III, IV HF, LVEF <30%, left ventricular end-diastolic volume ≥235,0 ml, NT-proBNP ≥2692,0 ng/ml. All variables were scored based on the в-coefficients. In the training sample, a value ≥45 points demonstrated a sensitivity of 82,4% and a specificity of 67,2% in predicting 5-year survival (AUC, 0,873; p<0,001). The index use on the test sample showed comparable results (AUC, 0,718; p=0,020; sensitivity — 71,4%, specificity — 62,5%). Also, in the training sample, the index ≥45 points was associated with1-year survival (sensitivity — 84,6%, specificity — 58,1%, AUC, 0,811; p<0,001).Conclusion. An index of personalized selection for CRT has been created, which makes it possible to accurately predict the 5-year survival rate, as well as the 1-year survival rate, regardless of the current selection criteria.

CRT operator challenges during procedure… tips and tricks

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (58) ◽  
pp. 21-27
Author(s):  
Tomasz Wcisło ◽  
Haval Dariusz Qawoq
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Advanced Heart Failure ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Left Ventricular Dyssynchrony ◽  
Tips And Tricks ◽  
Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ventricular Dyssynchrony

In addition to pharmacological treatment, cardiac resynchronization therapy is an important method of heart failure treating. It’s indicated for patients with advanced heart failure, decreased left ventricular ejection fraction, a wide QRS syndrome, and the presence of left ventricular dyssynchrony despite optimal pharmacotherapy. The procedure is technically difficult and laden with many possible complications. Based on our own experience, this paper presents management with one of the periprocedural complications – dissection of the coronary sinus.

scholarly journals 5 years follow-up of patients with heart failure and cardiac resynchronization: baseline variables associated to death

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Oliveira ◽  
PEDRO Cunha ◽  
MIGUEL Carmo ◽  
BRUNO Valente ◽  
INÊS Ricardo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Nyha Class ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Lifestyle Changes ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Spearman Test

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Introduction  Chronic Heart Failure (HF) has proven to be an increasing challenge for the global health management. Prognosis is affected by pharmacological optimization, comorbidities and risk factors control, lifestyle changes and invasive treatments like resynchronization (CRT) and transplant.  Purpose  To evaluate the association of baseline variables in HF patients, before CRT, with death event at 5 years follow up (FU).  Methods  Single center, post-hoc analysis of a prospective cohort of consecutive HF patients referred to CRT (2013-2015). Demographic data, HF etiology and NYHA class were evaluated at baseline as well as plasmatic of natriuretic peptide (BNP), heart to mediastinum ratio (HMR), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and volumes. Mortality was evaluated at 5 years. Patients were divided in two groups: "non survivors" and "survivors". Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Spearman test was used to evaluate the correlation between baseline variables and death.  Results  102 patients were included (age 68.8 ± 10 years), 68.6% male, 29% ischemic cardiomyopathy, 74% NYHA III/IV, baseline LVEF 26 ± 7. 27% were CRT non-responders. At 5 years follow up 43% died, with 1.96% lost FU. Baseline variables in the two groups are displayed in table 1. Statistical analysis correlating baseline variables with death (Spearman test) showed weak correlation, with the strongest correlation obtained: late HMR with negative correlation 0.34; LV tele-diastolic volume with positive correlation 0.26.  Conclusion The mortality at 5 years of HF patients with CRT was high (43%). Baseline variables (late HMR, LV tele-diastolic volume) were associated to death. These results should call early attention for a possible worst prognosis in severe HF patients to CRT. Table 1 "Non survivors" vs "Survivors" “Non Survivors”(n = 44) “Survivors”(n = 56) Age 67,11 ± 11,17 68,14 ± 10,51 Male 35 (80%) 35 (63%) NYHA III/IV 31 (70%) 43 (77%) Ischemic 15 (34%) 14 (25%) BNP 640,95 ± 606,23 370,41 ± 353,36 Late HMR 1,35 ± 0,16 1,47 ± 0,17 LVEF 27 ± 6,77 26 ± 7,47 Non responders 16 (36%) 12 (21%) LVTdV 225 ± 73,28 191 ± 58,5 PCR 10,33 ± 22,85 5,02 ± 9,27

Heart failure: definitions, investigation, and management

2017 ◽  
pp. 837-846
Author(s):  
John G. F. Cleland ◽  
John Baxter
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Pharmacological Treatment ◽  
Beta Blockers ◽  
Biventricular Pacing ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Qrs Duration ◽  
Robust Evidence

Heart failure is among the most common chronic debilitating conditions among older adults. The diagnosis is complex and usually made late, only after severe symptoms develop. Natriuretic peptides (BNP or NT-proBNP) are the key to early diagnosis of heart failure and echocardiography to its cause; most commonly ventricular dysfunction [either with a reduced (HFrEF) or preserved (HFpEF) left ventricular ejection fraction] or valve disease. For patients with HFrEF, pharmacological treatment with angiotensin converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and mineralo-corticoid receptor antagonists and for those in sinus rhythm beta-blockers and ivabradine have transformed prognosis. For patients with a QRS duration >140 msec, cardiac resynchronization with atrio-biventricular pacing should be considered. Iron deficiency should be sought for and treated. For patients with HFpEF, robust evidence that treatments improve outcome is lacking but for symptoms, the pharmacological treatment of HFpEF and HFrEF may be rather similar.

scholarly journals Early Use of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy to Accelerate Symptomatic Relief and Complete Left Ventricular Function Recovery in Peripartum Cardiomyopathy

Medicina ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 55 (6) ◽  
pp. 246
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Richard ◽  
Pierre Yves Turgeon ◽  
Michelle Dubois ◽  
Mario Sénéchal
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Symptomatic Relief ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Peripartum Cardiomyopathy ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Function Recovery

Peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) is a rare cause of heart failure that develops during the last month of pregnancy or within first months of delivery. We report the case of a 40-year-old woman diagnosed with severely symptomatic PPCM characterized by left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 10% and significant dyssynchrony secondary to a left bundle branch block (LBBB). Early cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) was used to achieve remarkable functional and LVEF recovery. This case suggests that early CRT must be considered for patients suffering from severely symptomatic PPCM despite optimal medical therapy for whom advanced heart failure therapies are proposed.

scholarly journals Cardiac strains as a tool for optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy in non-responders: a pilot study

Open Medicine ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 945-952
Author(s):  
David Šipula ◽  
Milan Kozák ◽  
Jaroslav Šipula ◽  
Miroslav Homza ◽  
Jiří Plášek
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Speckle Tracking ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Cardiac Strain ◽  
Maximum Improvement

AbstractBackgroundApproximately 30% of patients do not respond to implantation of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy – Defibrillators (CRT-D). The aim of this study was to investigate the potential for cardiac strain speckle tracking to optimize the performance of CRT-D in non-responding patients.Methods30 patients not responding to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Defibrillators after 3 months were randomly divided into control and intervention groups. Atrioventricular interval was adjusted so that E and A waves did not overlap, the interventricular interval was subsequently optimized to yield maximum improvement of the sum of longitudinal+radial+circumferential strains. The left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and NYHA improvement 3 months after optimization were evaluated and use of other strain combinations assessed.ResultsA significant correlation between the (combined) strain change and LVEF improvement was detected (p<0.01). 75% of patients with non-ischemic etiology of heart failure who did not respond to the original CRT-D reacted favorably with significant LVEF and NYHA improvement. The area strain was the best predictor of LVEF/NYHA improvement in those patients. No significant improvement was recorded in patients with ischemic etiology.ConclusionsAV and VV optimization based on speckle tracking is a very promising method potentially leading to a significant improvement of the outcome of CRT-D, especially in patients with non-ischemic etiology of heart failure.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document